Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:36:48.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Echanges internationaux et straégies collusives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Alexis Jacquemin
Alexis Jacquemin*
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain
Get access

Résumé

De nombreux travaux récents ont jeté un doute sur la capacité des modèles traditionnels de fournir une explication totalement satisfaisante des échanges internationaux. Le recours accru aux analyses d'Economie Industrielle, de concurrence imparfaite et de théorie des jeux fournit un cadre complémentaire particulièrement utile.

C'est dans ce contexte que le présent article propose quelques illustrations simples des nouvelles recherches. La première section met en lumière plusieurs aspects des relations stratégies internationales, y compris le rôle joué par les acteurs publics. La deuxième section illustre le rôle des stratégies collusives, tant privées que publiques dans les échanges internationaux.

Summary

Summary

Much of the work recently carried out casts doubt on the capacity of traditional models, linked to the Walrasian paradigm, to provide a valid explanation of international trade. Instead, increasing use is being made of industrial organisation analyses, imperfect competition theories and the theory of games.

It is against this background that this paper sets out a number of simple illustrations of this new research. The first section highlights certain aspects of international strategic relations, including the role played by the public authorities. The second illustrates private and public collusive strategies in international trade.

Keywords

410610410610
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , 1988 , pp. 85 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

L’auteur est Professeur d’Economie l’UCL et Conseiller Economique auprès de la Commisson des Communautés Européennes.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

D’Aspremont, Cl. et Jacquemin, A. (1988), A Note on Cooperative and Non Cooperative R&D in Duopoly, American Economic Review, septembre.Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, Cl, Jacquemin, A. et Gabszewicz, J.J., (eds), Imperfect competition, International trade and European Industry, European Economic Review, 1988.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984), The evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Brander, J. et Spencer, B. (1983), Strategic commitment with R & D : the symmetric case, Bell Journal of Economics, Printemps, pp. 225–235 Google Scholar
Brock, W. et Magee, S. (1978), The economics of special interest politics : the case of the tariff, American Economic Review, Mai, pp. 246–50.Google Scholar
Caves, R. (1979), in : Dornbusch, R. et Frenkel, J. (ed.), International economic policy : theory and evidence, J. Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chipman, J. (1965–66), A survey of the theory of international trade, Econometrica, 33 et 34.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. et Kyle, A. (1985), The use of protection and subsidies for entry promotion and deterrence, American Economic Review, 75, pp. 139–52.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. et Grossman, G. (1983), Optimal trade and industrial policy, NBER, Document de travail, n° 1236.Google Scholar
FONDATION POUR L’ETUDE DU DROIT ET DES USAGES DU COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL (1980), Aides et mesures de sauvegarde en droit international économique, Commission Droit et Vie des Affaires de l’Université de Liège, Ed. du Moniteur, Paris.Google Scholar
Godek, P. (1985), Industry structure and redistribution through trade restrictions, Journal of Law and Economics, octobre, pp. 687–703.Google Scholar
Grinols, E. (1985), Trade, distortions and welfare under uncertainty, Oxford Economic Papers, septembre, pp. 362–74.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, A., Nambu, T. et Dewez, I. (1981), A dynamic analysis of export cartels : the Japanese case, The Economic Journal, septembre, pp. 685–96.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, A. (1982), Imperfect market structure and international trade, Kyklos, n°l, pp. 75–93.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, A. (1985), Sélection et pouvoir dans la nouvelle économie industrielle, Bruxelles, De Boeck et Economica.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, A. (1987), Comportements collusifs et accords en recherche-développement, Revue d’Economie Politique, n°l, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Kemps, M. et Wan, H. (1976), An elementary proposition concerning the formation of customs unions, Journal of International Economics, vol. 6, n°l, pp. 95–97.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1981), Intraindustry specialization and the gains from trade, Journal of Political Economy, octobre, 89(5), pp. 959–973.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. (1960), The strategy of conflict, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (1986), Noncooperative Bargaining Theory : an Introduction, Review of Economic Studies, (5), n°176, pp. 709–724.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. et Matthewson, , ed. (1986), New developments in the analysis of market structure, Cambridge, Mass, M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Venables, A. et Smith, A. (1986), Trade and Industry, Economic Policy, octobre.Google Scholar
Verreydt, E. et Waelbroek, J. (1982), EC protection against manufactured goods, in : Bhagwati, J. (ed.), Import competition and response, National Bureau of Economic Research, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar