Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:22:37.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does the “New Economy” Change the Frontiers of the Large Corporation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Bruno Amable
Affiliation:
University of Paris X, MODEM and CEPREMAP
Régis Breton
Affiliation:
University of Paris X, FORUM
Xavier Ragot
Affiliation:
CEPREMAP
Get access

Summary

This paper proposes a model of industrial innovation linked to financial liberalisation where agents are characterised by heterogeneous innovative abilities. Individual researchers may either be employed by a large firm and work together on the firm’s innovative project, or they may alternatively set up an individual firm in order to commercialise their own innovation. The large firm’s hiring decisions and the individual researcher’s decision to set up his own firm depends on the researcher’s innovative ability and on the financial conditions. Financial liberalisation leading to a lower cost of setting up a small firm will affect the size of the large firm and increase the number of small technology firms. A drop in the cost of starting a small firm may increase income inequality.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article propose un modèle d’innovation industrielle liée à la libéralisation financière où les agents sont charactérisés par des capacités d’innovation hétérogènes. Les chercheurs individuels peuvent soit être employés par une grande entreprise et travailler ensemble sur un projet d’innovation de l’entreprise, soit créer une entreprise individuelle afin de commercialiser leur propre innovation. Les décisions d’embauche de la grande entreprise et la décision du chercheur individuel de créer sa propre entreprise dépendent de la capacité d’innovation du chercheur et des conditions financières. La libéralisation financière qui diminue le coût de la création d’une petite entreprise affecte la taille de la grande entreprise et accroît le nombre de petites firmes technologiques. Une baisse du coût de création d’entreprise peut augmenter l’inégalité des revenus.

Type
III. Finance
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. (1998), “Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 10551089.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Tirole, J. (1994), “On the Management of Innovation”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 11851207.Google Scholar
Ambec, S. and Poitevin, M. (1998), “Organizational design of R&D activities”, Unpublished, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Bergemann, D. and Hege, U. (1997), “Venture Capital Financing, Moral Hazard, and Learning”, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E. and Kahin, B. (Eds) (2000) Understanding the Digital Economy, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, M. (1998) “That Thing Venture Capitalists Do.”, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, January/February, pp. 1526.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B. and Tirole, J. (1997), “Financial intermediation, loanable funds and the real sector”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62/3 p.Google Scholar
Katz, L. (2000), “Technological Change, Computerization, and the Wage Structure”, in Brynjolfsson, E. and Kahin, B. (Eds), Understanding the Digital Economy, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. (1995), “Venture Capitalists and the Oversight of Private Firms”, Journal of Finance, 50(1), 301318.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. (2000), “Small Business, Innovation, and Public Policy”, in Brynjolfsson, E. and Kahin, B. (Eds), Understanding the Digital Economy, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
OECD (2000), A New Economy? The changing role of innovation and information technology in growth, Paris: OECD, 663690.Google Scholar