No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 August 2016
In a series of papers (Ginsburgh and Erlich (1984), Ginsburgh and Van der Heyden (1985), Erlich, Ginsburgh and Van der Heyden (1985)), we have tried to assess by how much the real wage should be or should have been decreased in order to ensure short and/or long run full employment.
This short note describes the main ideas lying behind the general equilibrium model built to answer these questions and summarizes the main results.
The model attempts to embed a situation of short run market imperfections into a long run competitive equilibrium framework. If price rigidities and a lack of substitution between factors are acceptable assumptions in the short run, there do exist no better concepts than flexible prices, substitution possibilities and equilibrium in all markets in the long run.