Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:09:21.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alternative Aspects of Monetary Theory in the “General Theory”: Signifiance and Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Paola Potestio
Paola Potestio*
Affiliation:
University of Rome
Get access

Abstract

The article argues that there are two distinct conceptions of money in Keynes’ General Theory, one pertinent to the model of Chs. 1–15 and the other to the model of Ch. 17. Within the context of the first conception no aspect of money other than its role as a link between the present and the future is essential. Whitin the context of the second, the peculiar characteristics of money (low or zero elasticities of production and substitution) assume a decisive role and are crucial in the explanation of the unemployment equilibrium. The article points out that, as a result of this dichotomy, alternative aspects of monetary theory emerge, so that the General Theory cannot be regarded as providing a unified theoritical framework.

Cet article soutient que, dans sa “théorie générale”, Keynes expose deux thèses différents à propos de la monnaie, la première contenue dans les chapitres un à quinze, la seconde, dans le chapitre dix-sept. Dans la première, le seul rôle atribué à la monnaie est la liaison entre le présent et le futur. Dans le seconde, les caractéristiques propres de la monnaie (élasticité faible ou nulle par rapport au niveau de production et élasticité de substitution faible ou nulle) ont une importance décisive. Celles-ci sont censées être cruciales pour expliquer l’équilibre de sous-emploi.

Ces aspects joints mais alternatifs de la théorie monétaire, que l'article dévoile, contribuent ç illustrer l'impossibilité d'une approche unique de la “Théorie générate”.

Keywords

011011
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , 1989 , pp. 257 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

A very preliminary draft of this article was presented at the “Deuxième Colloque de l’Association Charles Gide pour l’Etude de la Pensée Economique” on the theme La monnaie: Objet théorique, sujet historique? which took place in Nice on September 24th/25th, 1987.

References

REFERENCES

Chick, V. (1983), Macroeconomics after Keynes, Philip Allan, Oxford.Google Scholar
Coddington, A. (1983), Keynesian Economics. The Search for First Principles, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. (1978a), Money and the Real World, 2nd. ed., Macmillan.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. (1978b), Why Money Matters: Lesson from a Half-century of Monetary Theory, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, I, 1, pp. 10–70.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. (1980), The Dual-faceted Nature of the Keynesian Revolution, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, II, 3, pp. 291—307.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. (1984), Reviving Keynes’s Revolution, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, VI, 4, pp. 561—575.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1960), Keynes’ Theory of the Own Rates of Interest, Essays on Economic Stability and Growth, Duckworth, London, pp. 59–74.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1973a), Collected Writings, Vol. VII: The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1973b), Collected Writings, Vol. XTV: The General Theory and After, Part II, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Kregel, J. A. (1976), Economic Methodology in the Face of Uncertainty, Economic Journal, LXXXVI, pp. 209–25.Google Scholar
Kregel, J. A. (1983), Effective Demand: Origins and Development of the Notion, in: Kregel, J. A. (ed.), Distribution, Effective Demand and International Economic Relations, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Kregel, J. A. (1985), Hamlet without the Prince: Cambridge Macroeconomics without Money, The American Economic Review, 75, 2, pp. 133–139.Google Scholar
Lerner, A. P. (1952), The Essential Properties of Interest and Money, Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXVI, pp. 172–193.Google Scholar
Postetio, P. (1986), Equilibrium and Employment in The General Theory’, Giornale degli Economisti, XLV, pp. 363—388.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (1961), Own Rates of Interest, Economic Journal, LXXI, pp. 596–600.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1932), Dr. Hayek on Money and Capital, Economic Journal, XLII, pp. 142–53.Google Scholar
Steedman, I., Own Interest Rates and Concepts of Equilibrium, manuscript.Google Scholar