Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:02:09.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On unilateral divorce and the “selection of marriages” hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Eric Langlais
Get access

Summary

In this paper, the unilateral divorce law is modelled through the combination of exclusive rights on the marriage dissolution and alternative compensation rules benefiting to the parent having custody of the children. Their influence are studied both in the short run (probability and efficiency of divorce) and in the long run (selection of marriages). We show that a decrease in the costs of divorce proceedings has by no means commonplace consequences on marriage contracting; particularly when consideration of parents' altruism and child support is introduced, more marriages are contracted when the cost of divorces decreases.

Résumé

Résumé

Le divorce unilatéral est modélisé ici en combinant des droit exclusifs sur la dissolution du marriage et différentes règles de compensations en faveur du parent qui a la garde des enfants. On étudie leurs effets de court terme (fréquence et efficacité du divorce) comme de long terme (sélection des marriages). Une baisse des coûts liés à la procédure de divorce a des effets qui ne sont pas triviaux pour la formation des mariages ; en particulier, lorsque l'on prend en compte l'altruisme des parents et les dispositions financières en faveur des enfants de couples divorcés, il apparaît qu'un plus grand nombre de mariages peuvent être conclus alors que le coût du divorce diminue.

Keywords

modèles du mariagedivorce unilatéralaltruisme parental et mesures protectives en faveur des enfantsD1K10K12K41J12marriage modelsunilateral divorce lawthe parents' altruism and protective measures for childrenD1K10K12K41J12
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , 2010 , pp. 229 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

University Nancy 2, UFR AES, 4 Rue de la Ravinelle - CO 7026, 54035 Nancy cedex, France; tel: 03 83 19 27 60; [email protected].

**

I am grateful to Yannick Gabuthy and Nuno Garoupa for their comments on a previous draft of the paper, and also to the referees of the journal for their stimulating criticisms and suggestions. As usual, all remaining errors are mine.

References

REFERENCES

Amar, E. and Guérin, S. (2007), “Se marier ou non : le droit fiscal peut-il aider à choisir?”, Economie et Statistique, vol. 401, pp 23–38.Google Scholar
Anxo, D., Flood, L. and Kocoglu, Y. (2002), “Offre de travail et répartition des activités domestiques et parentales au sein du couple: une com-paraison entre la France et la Suède”, Economie et Statistique, vol. 352–353, pp 127–150.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1991), A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge: Harward University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G., Landes, E. and Michael, R. (1977), “An economic analysis of marital instability”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 85, pp 1141–1187.Google Scholar
Belmokhtar, Z. (2000), Les divorces en 1996. Une analyse statistique des jugements prononcés, Ministère de la Justice.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, T. (1996), “Economies in a family way”, Journal of Economie Literature, vol. 34, pp 1903–1934.Google Scholar
Binner, J.M. and Dnes, A.W. (2001), “Marriage, divorce and legal change: new evidence from England and Wales”, Economic Inquiry, vol. 39, pp 298–306.Google Scholar
Bourreau-Dubois, C. Deffains, B. and Jeandidier, B. (2005), “Un barème de pension alimentaire pour l’entretien des enfants en cas de divorce”, Revue Française des Affaires Sociales, vol. 4, pp 101–132.Google Scholar
Bowles, R. and Garoupa, N. (2003), “Household dissolution, child care and divorce law”, International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 22, 495–510.Google Scholar
Brinig, M. and Allen, D.W. (2000), “These boots are made for walking: why most divorce filers are women?”, American Law and Economics Review, vol. 2, pp 126–169.Google Scholar
Brinig, M. and Crafton, S. (1994), “Marriage and opportunism”, Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 23, 869–894.Google Scholar
Brinig, M. and Nock, S.L. (1999), “The division of labor, the new marriage and marital instability”, SSRN Working Paper No 162730.Google Scholar
Clark, S. (1999), “Law, property and marital dissolution”, Economic Journal, vol. 109, C41-C54.Google Scholar
Coelho, C. and Garoupa, N. (2006), “Do divorce law reforms matter for divorce rates? Evidence from Portugal”, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 3, pp 525–542.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. (1997), “Marriages, divorce and quasi-rents; or Ί gave him the best years of my life’”, Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 16, pp 267–272.Google Scholar
Deffains, B. and Langlais, E. (2006), “Incentives to cooperate and the discretionary power of courts in divorce law”, Review of Economics of the Household, vol. 4, pp 423–439.Google Scholar
Dnes, A.W. (2004), “The life-profile theory of marriage, cohabitation and same-sex marriage”, Working Paper, Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar
Ellman, I.M. and Lohr, S.L. (1998), “Dissolving the relationship between divorce laws and divorce rates”, International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 18, pp 341–359.Google Scholar
Fella, G., Manzini, P. and Mariotti, M. (2004), “Does divorce law matter?”, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 2, pp 607–633.Google Scholar
Francesconi, M. and Muthoo, A. (2004), “Incomplete contracts and marriage: a model of child custody”, mimeo, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Friedberg, L. (1997), “Did unilateral divorce raise divorce rate?”, American Economic Review, vol. 88, 608–627 Google Scholar
Gardner, J. and Oswald, A. (2006), “Do divorcing couples become happier by breaking up?”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, vol. 169, pp 319–336.Google Scholar
González, L. and Viitanen, T. (2006), “The effect of divorce laws on divorce rates in Europe”, IZA DP No. 2023, Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (1998), “Divorce law changes, household bargaining and married women’s labor supply”, American Economic Review, vol. 88, 628–648.Google Scholar
Grossbard-Shechtman, (1996), “Marriage market models”, in : Tommasi, M. and Ierulli, K. (Eds), The New Economics of Human Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, T., Rosenbluth, F. and Soskice, D. (2005), “Divorce and the Gender Division of Labor in Comparative Perspective”, Department of Political Science Duke University.Google Scholar
Jeandidier, B. (2003), “Analyse empirique du comportement des juges auprès du Tribunal de Mulhouse en matière de fixation des pensions alimentaires” in : Bourreau-Dubois, C. and Deffains, B. (éditeurs), Les obligations alimentaires vis-à-vis des enfants de the parents divorcés : une analyse économique au service du droit, études coordonnées pour le compte du GIP « Mission Recherche Droit et Justice » du Ministère de la Justice et de la MiRE du Ministère de l'Emploi et de la Solidarité.Google Scholar
Legendre, F. and Thibault, F. (2007), “Les concubins et l’impôt sur le revenu en France”, Economie et Statistique, vol. 401, pp 3–22.Google Scholar
Mechoulan, S. (2006), “Divorce law and the structure of the american family”, Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 35, pp 143–174.Google Scholar
Mechoulan, S. (2005), “Economic theory’s stance on no-fault divorce”, Review of Economics of the Household, vol. 3, pp 337–359.Google Scholar
Nock, S. and Brinig, M. (2002), “Weak Men and Disorderly Women. Divorce and the Division of Labor”, in : Anthony Dnes and Robert Rowthorn, Marriage and Divorce: A Law and Economics Approach, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nordblom, K. (2004), “Cohabitation and marriage in a risky world”, Review of Economics of the Household, vol. 2, pp 325–340.Google Scholar
Oswald, A. (2002a), “Cupid, Statistics and the Economics of Divorce”, mimeo, Warwick University.Google Scholar
Oswald, A. (2002b), “Homes, Sex and the Asymmetry Hypothesis”, mimeo, Warwick University.Google Scholar
Parkman, A. (1998), “Why are married women working so hard?”, International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 18, pp 41–49.Google Scholar
Peters, H.E. (1986), “Marriage and divorce: informational constraints and private contracting”, American Economic Review, vol. 76, pp 437–448.Google Scholar
Prioux, F. (2006), “Vivre en couple, se marier, se séparer: contrastes européens”, Population & Sociétés, No 422, avril, pp 1–4.Google Scholar
Prioux, F. (2007), “Recent demographic developments in France: fertility at a more than 30-year high”, Population, vol. 62, 415–456.Google Scholar
Rainer, H. (2007), “Should we write prénuptial contracts?”, European Economic Review, vol. 51, pp 337–363.Google Scholar
Smith, I. (1997), “Explaining the growth of divorce in Great Britain”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. 44, pp 519–544.Google Scholar
Smith, I. (2002), “European divorce laws, divorce rates and their conse-quences”, in Anthony Dnes and Robert Rowthorn, Marriage and Divorce: A Law and Economics Approach, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wax, A.S. (1998), “Bargaining in the shadow of the market: is there a future for egalitarian marriage?”, Virginia Law Review, vol. 84, pp 509–672.Google Scholar
Wickelgren, A. (2009), “Why divorce law matter: incentives for noncontract-ible marital investments under unilateral and consent divorce”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol. 25, pp 80–106.Google Scholar
Weiss, Y. and Willis, R. (1997), “Match quality, new information and marital dissolution”, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 11, pp 293–329.Google Scholar
Zelder, M. (1993), “Inefficient dissolution as a consequence of public goods: the case of non-fault divorce”, Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 22, pp 503–520.Google Scholar