Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:19:53.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Firm as an Institution: Recent Evolution in the Contractual Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Liliana Basile  and
Paola Casavola
Liliana Basile
Affiliation:
University of Naples
Paola Casavola
Affiliation:
Banco d'ltalia
Get access

Summary

The aim of this paper is to clarify the connection between types of firms and types of assumptions about the information structure. Building on the role of information structure, notions of the firm as an organisation have been put forward which suggest that the firm can assume an alternative (to the market) coordinating role in conditions of contractual incompleteness. A comparison (and opposition) between two recent approaches to the theory of the firm as an organisation seems to suggest that different notions of incomplete contracts imply substantial differences in terms of the meaning of a Pareto-efficiency improvement, of the role to assign to vertical integration, and of the determinants of the dimension of the firm.

Résumé

Résumé

Le but de cet article est de clarifier le lien existant entre types de firmes et types d'hypothèses sur la structure de l'information. A partir de cette dernière, on a avancé l'idée que la firme pouvait constituer une alternative au marché pour la coordination quand les contrats sont incomplets. Une comparaison (et une mise en opposition) entre les deux approches récentes de la théorie de la firme comme organisation semble suggérer que des notions différentes de contrats incomplets impliquent des différences substantielles dans la signification des gains d'efficacité parétienne et du rôle à donner à l'intégration verticale, ainsi qu'aux déterminants de la taille de la firme.

Keywords

D23D23
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 249 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(*)

We would like to thank Richard Arena, Fabrizio Barca, Maurizio Franzini, Ugo Pagano, Bob Rowthorn, Neri Salvadori, Christian Schmidt and the participants at the Pittsburgh Convention of the Eastern Economic Association, 15-17 March 1991, the Marseille Conference “L’Institutionnalisme en Question”, 19-20 September 1991, and the Siena Workshop “Istituzioni, Crescita e Sviluppo Economico”, 1-3 October 1992, for valuable discussions on earlier drafts. We would particularly like to thank the anonymous referees of this Journal for their detailed reports on a previous version of the paper. Financial support from CNR and MURST is gratefully akwnoledged. The opinions expressed remain our own responsibility.

References

REFERENCES

Alchian, A. [1984], Specificity, Specialization, and Coalitions, Journal of Economic Theory and Institutions, vol. 140, n° 1, pp. 34–49.Google Scholar
Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H. [1972], Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization, American Economic Review, vol. 62, n ° 5, pp. 777–795.Google Scholar
Basile, L. and Casavola, P. [1991], L'impresa come istituzione: efficienza e contrattazione incomplete, Note Economiche, vol. 21, n° 2, pp. 272–295.Google Scholar
Coase, R. [1937], The Nature of the Firm, Economica, vol.4, n° 16, pp.386–405, reprinted in L. Putterman (ed.) [1986], and in O. E. Williamson and S.G. Winter(eds.)[1991].Google Scholar
Coase, R. [1960], The Problem of Social Cost, Journal of Law and Economics, vol.3, n° 1, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Coase, R. [1988], The Nature of the Firm: Origin, Meaning, Influence, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol. 4, n° 1, pp. 3–47, reprinted in O. E. Williamson and S. G.Winter (eds.) [1991].Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. [1988], The Theory of the Firm Revisited, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol.4, n° 1, pp. 141–161, reprinted in O. E. Williamson and S. G. Winter (eds.) [1991].Google Scholar
Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.) [1989], Allocation, Information and Markets, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Egidi, M. (ed.) [1989], Bounded Rationality and the Theory of the Firm. An Interview with Herbert A. Simon, Economia e Banco - Annali Scientifici, 1989, n° 2, pp. 41–70.Google Scholar
Fama, E.F. [1980], Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 88, n° 2, pp. 288–307.Google Scholar
Grossman, S. and Hart, O. [1984], Vertical Integration and the Distribution of Property Rights, mimeo, Chicago, printed in Razin, A.. and Sadka, E. (eds) [1987].Google Scholar
Grossman, S. and Hart, O. [1986], The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: a Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration, Journal of Political Economy, vol.94, n° 4, pp.691–719.Google Scholar
Hart, O. [1988a], Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol. 4, n° 1, pp. 119–139, reprinted in O. E. Williamson and S. G. Winter (eds.) [1991].Google Scholar
Hart, O. [1988b], Capital Structure as a Control Mechanism in Corporations, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 21, n° 3, pp. 467–476.Google Scholar
Hart, O. [1989], An Economist's Perpective on the Theory of the Firm, Columbia Law Review, vol. 89 n° 7, pp. 1757–1774.Google Scholar
Hart, O. [1990], Is ‘Bounded Rationality’ an Important Element of a Theory of Institutions?, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 46 n° 4, pp. 696–701.Google Scholar
Hart, O. and Holmstrom, B. [1987], The Theory of Contracts, in Bewley, T. (ed.), Advances of Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, O. and Moore, J. [1988], Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation, Econometrica, vol. 56, n» 4, pp. 755–785.Google Scholar
Hart, O. and Moore, J. [1990], Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy vol. 98, n° 6, pp. 1119–1158.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. [1988], Economics and Institutions, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B. [1979], Moral Hazard and Observability, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10, n° 1, pp. 74–91.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B. [1982], Moral Hazard in Teams, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 13, n° 2, pp. 324–340.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B. and Tirole, J. [1989], The Theory of the Firm, in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. (eds.), [1989].Google Scholar
Klein, B., Crawford, R. A. and Alchian, A. [1978], Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents and the Competitive Contracting Process, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 21, pp. 297–326, reprinted in L. Putterman (ed.) [1986].Google Scholar
Kay, N. M. [1992], Markets, False Hierarchies and the Evolution of the Modern Corporation, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 17, n° 3, pp. 315–333.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. [1988], Economic Theories of the Firm: Past, Present, and Future, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 21, n° 3, pp. 444–458.Google Scholar
North, D.C. [1991], Institutions, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 5, n° 1, pp. 97–112.Google Scholar
Pagano, U. [1991], Property Rights, Asset Specificity, and the Division of Labour under Alternative Capitalist Relations, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1991, vol. 15, n° 3, pp. 315–342.Google Scholar
Pagano, U. [1992a], Authority, Co-ordination and Disequilibrium: an Explanation of the Co-existence of Markets and Firms, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 3, n° 1, pp. 53–77.Google Scholar
Pagano, U. [1992b], Imprese, tecnologia e diritti di proprietà, Economia Politica, vol.9, n° 1, pp. 89–121.Google Scholar
Pagano, U. [1992c], Organizational Equilibria and Production Efficiency, Metroeconomica, vol. 43, n° 1-2, pp. 227–246.Google Scholar
Putterman, L. [1986], The Economie Nature of the Firm: overview, in Put-terman, L. (ed.), [1986].Google Scholar
Putterman, L. (ed.) [1986], The Economie Nature of the Firm: a Reader, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Razin, A. et Sadka, E. (eds.) [1987], Economie Policy in Theory and Practice, New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Richardson, G.B. [1972], The Organization of Industry, The Economic Journal, vol. 82, n° 327, pp. 883–896.Google Scholar
Ross, S. [1973], The Economic Theory of Agency: the Principal's Problem, American Economic Review, vol. 63, n° 2, pp. 134–139.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, A. [1990], New Directions in Economic Theory - Bounded Rationality, working paper, Tel-Aviv, Foerder Institute for Economic Research, pp. 11–90.Google Scholar
Schmalensee, R. [1988], Industrial Economics: an Overview, The Economic Journal, vol. 98, n° 392, pp.643–681.Google Scholar
Schmalensee, R. et Willig, R. (eds.) [1989], Handbook of Industrial Organization, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Simon, H. [1945], Administrative Behavior, New York, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. [1955], A Behavioural Model of Rational Choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 69, n° 274, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
Simon, H. [1982], Models of Bounded Rationality, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. [1974], Incentives and Risk Sharing in Sharecropping, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 41, n° 2, pp. 219–255.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. [1987], The Causes and Consequences of the Dependence of Quality on Price, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 25, n° 1, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. [1989], Principal and Agent, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.), Allocation, Information and Markets, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. [1991], The invisible Hand and Modern Welfare Economics, NBER working paper 3641.Google Scholar
Tlrole, J. [1986], Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: on the Role of Collusion in Organizations, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol.2, n° 2, pp. 181–214.Google Scholar
Tirole, J. [1988], The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. [1971], The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations, The American Economic Review, vol. 61, n° 2, pp. 112–123.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. [1975], Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. [1985], The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. [1988], The Logic of Economic Organization, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization reprinted in Williamson, O. E. et Winter, S. G. (eds.) [1991].Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. [1989], Transaction Cost Economics, in Schmalensee, R. et Willig, R. (eds.) [1989].Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. [1992], Markets, Hierarchies, and the Modern Corporation. An Unfolding Perspective, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 17, n° 3, pp. 335–352.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. and Winter, S. G. (eds.) [1991], The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolutions and Development, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar