Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:23:12.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Equity and efficiency of a reform of Belgian indirect taxes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

André Decoster
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven
Erik Schokkaert
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven
Get access

Summary

In this paper we apply the theory of tax reform to derive empirical results about the structure of indirect taxes in Belgium. We focus on the equity-efficiency trade-off and try to formulate conclusions which are relevant for policy makers. To integrate the merit good component in the indirect taxes on tobacco and transportation, we compute the implicit valuation attached to them by policy makers. This component is considerable and affects the whole structure of tax rates.

Résumé

Résumé

Dans cet article nous appliquons la théorie de la réforme fiscale pour obtenir des résultats empiriques à propos de la structure des taxes indirectes en Belgique. Nous centrons notre attention sur l’arbitrage entre équité et efficacité et tentons de formuler des conclusions pertinentes pour la décision politique. Pour estimer l’importance de la composante “biens tutélaires” dans les taxes indirectes sur le tabac et le transport nous calculons la valeur implicite qui lui est attribuée par les décideurs. Cette composante s’avère être considérable; elle affecte toute la structure des taux de taxation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

During the period of this research, A. Decoster was Fellow of the National Foundation for Scientific Research (N.F.W.O)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmad, E.and Stern, N. (1984), The Theory of Reform and Indian Indirect Taxes, Journal of Public Economics, 25, pp. 259–98.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. and Stiglitz, J. (1976), The Design of Tax Structure: Direct Versus Indirect Taxation, Journal of Public Economics, 6, pp. 5575.Google Scholar
Boadway, R. and Bruce, N. (1984), Welfare Economics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Browning, E.K. (1976), The Marginal Cost of Public Funds, Journal of Political Economy, 84, pp. 283–98.Google Scholar
Christiansen, V. (1984), Which commodity taxes should supplement the income tax?, Journal of Public Economics, 24, pp. 195220.Google Scholar
Christiansen, V. and Jansen, E.S. (1978), Implicit Social Preferences in the Norwegian System of Indirect Taxation, Journal of Public Economics, 10, pp. 217–45.Google Scholar
Decoster, A. and Schokkaert, E. (1987), Tax Reform Results with Different Demand Systems, Discussion Paper, Center for Economic Studies, K.U. Leuven.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. and Mirrlees, J. (1971), Optimal Taxation and Public Production I-II, American Economic Review 61, pp. 827 and 261–78.Google Scholar
Feldstein, M.S. (1972), Distributional Equity and the Optimal Structure of Public Prices, American Economic Review 62, pp. 32–6.Google Scholar
Keller, Wand J. Van Driel (1985), Differential Consumer Demand Systems, European Economic Review 27, pp. 375–90.Google Scholar
Paraire-Laguesse, Y. et al. (1986), De Weerslag van de Indirecte Belastingen op de Verdeling van de Gezinsinkomens in België, Documentatieblad van het Minuterie van Financien 7/8, pp. 932.Google Scholar
Sah, R.K. (1983), How much redistribution is possible through commodity taxes?, Journal of Public Economics, 20, pp. 89101.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (1977), The Marginal Valuation of Income, in Artis, M.J. and Nobay, A.R. (eds.), Studies in modern economic analysis, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 209–54.Google Scholar
Wibaut, S. (1987), A Model of Tax Reform for Belgium, Journal of Public Economics, 32, pp. 5377.Google Scholar