Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:36:20.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of the webcam for teaching a foreign language in a desktop videoconferencing environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

Christine Develotte ,
Nicolas Guichon  and
Caroline Vincent
Christine Develotte*
Affiliation:
INRP, 19 allée de Fontenay, BP 17424 – 69347, Cedex 07 Lyon, France (email: [email protected])
Nicolas Guichon*
Affiliation:
Université Lyon 2, Bâtiment FILTRE, 5 avenue Pierre Mendès-France, 69500 Bron, France (email: [email protected])
Caroline Vincent*
Affiliation:
ENS-LSH, 15, parvis René Descartes, UMR 5191 ICAR, BP 7000- 69342 Cedex 07 Lyon, France (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores how language teachers learn to teach with a synchronous multimodal setup (Skype), and it focuses on their use of the webcam during the pedagogical interaction. First, we analyze the ways that French graduate students learning to teach online use the multimodal resources available in a desktop videoconferencing (DVC) environment to monitor pedagogical interactions with intermediate level learners of French in a North-American university. Then, we examine communicational and pedagogical aspects of this process which involves orchestrating different modalities and deploying various regulations for “semio-pedagogical” purposes. We define semio-pedagogical skills as the capacity to mediate a pedagogical interaction by combining or dissociating modalities (written, oral, and/or video) that are adapted to objectives and to the cognitive requisites of the task. We posit that these skills have to become part of the professional repertoire of future teachers, as they will increasingly be required to exploit the multimodal potentialities of online communication in their teaching.

The study draws on screen capture recordings of teacher trainee-student interactions and is completed by semi-directive interviews with teacher trainees (n = 5). It aims (1) to identify the importance of webcamming in the share of the pedagogical range available to teachers and (2) analyze the non verbal dimension of pedagogical communication via DVC.

The outcome of this study is the identification of five degrees of utilization of the webcam medium: there a certain gradation in the way webcamming is used (with a more or less significant use of image) when compared to other modalities. The different uses that are identified vary according to the perceived usefulness of webcamming to monitor teaching and to the teacher trainees’ capacity to manage different workspaces.

Keywords

desktop videoconferencingsynchronous online teachingwebcammingnon-verbal communicationsemio-pedagogical skills
Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 293 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carlson, R. (1997) Educating online: Creating the virtual classroom community. ERIC ED 412 934.Google Scholar
Cosnier, J. (2008) Les gestes du dialogue. La communication état des savoirs. Auxerre: Sciences humaines, 119–128.Google Scholar
Develotte, C., Guichon, N.Kern, R. (2008) “Allo UC Berkeley? Ici Lyon 2… Vous nous voyez bien?” Etude d’un dispositif de formation en ligne synchrone franco-américain à travers les discours de ses usagers. Alsic, 11(2): 129–156.Google Scholar
ELAN Elan Linguistic Annotator developed by Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, The Netherlands. (http://www.lat-mpi.eu/tools/elan/download).Google Scholar
de Fornel, M. (1994) Le cadre interactionnel de l’échange visiophonique. Réseaux, 64: 107–132.Google Scholar
Foulon-Molenda, S. (2000) A-t-on besoin de se voir pour coopérer? Contribution théorique issue de la psycholinguistique. Le Travail Humain, 63: 97–120.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1994) Les cadres de l’expérience. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Guichon, N. (2009) Training future language teachers to develop online tutors’ competence through reflective analysis. ReCALL, 21(2): 166–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guichon, N.Drissi, S. (2008) Tutorat de langue par visioconférence: comment former aux régulations pédagogiques. Les Cahiers de l’ACEDLE, 5(1): 185–217.Google Scholar
Heath, C.Luff, P. (1992) Media Space and Communicative Asymetries: Prelminary Observations of Video-Mediated Interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 7(3): 315–346.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. W.Cunningham, L. (1994) Creating interactive sociocultural environments for self-regulated learning. In: Schunk, D. H. and Zimmerman, B. J. (eds.), Self-regulation of Learning and Performance. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 255–281.Google Scholar
Hrastinski, H.Keller, C. (2007) Computer-Mediated Communication in Education: A Review of Recent Research. Educational Media International, 4(1): 61–77.Google Scholar
Jaraugi, K.Banados, E. (2008) Virtual interaction through video-web communication: A step towards enriching and internationalizing language learning programs. ReCALL, 20(2): 183–207.Google Scholar
Jonassen, D. H., Lee, C. B., Yang, C. C.Laffey, J. (2005) The collaboration principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge university Press, 247–270.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2004) The problem of Context in Computer Mediated Communication. In: Levine, P. and Scollon, R. (eds.), Discourse & Technology multimodal discourse analysis. Washington DC: Georgetown University press, 20–33.Google Scholar
Kress, G.Van Leuwen, T. (1996) Multimodal discourse: the modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Lamy, M. N.Hampel, R. (2007) Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lancien, T. (2000) Multimédia : les mutations du texte. Lyon: ENS Editions.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.-P. (2000) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, L. (2007) One to one Desktop Videoconferencing for Developing Oral Skills: Prospects in Perspective. In: O’Dowd, R. (ed.), Online Intercultural Exchange. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, C.Relieu, M. (2007) Présentation. Réseaux, 144: 9–22.Google Scholar
Marcelli, A., Gaveau, D.Tokiwa, R. (2005) Utilisation de la visioconférence dans un programme de FLE: tâches communicatives et interactions orales. Alsic, 8: 185–203.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2005) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2006) The Use of Videoconferencing and E-mail as Mediators of Intercultural Student Ethnography. In: Belz J. A. and Thorne S. L. (eds.), Computer-mediated Intercultural Foreign Language Education. Boston: Heinle and Heinle, 86–120.Google Scholar
Oviatt, S., Coulston, R.Lunsford, R. (2004) When do we interact multimodally? Cognitive load and multimodal communication patterns. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Multimodal interfaces. Pennsylvania State College, 129–136.Google Scholar
Peraya, D. (1998) Les campus virtuels. Principes et fondements techno-sémio-pragmatiques des dispositifs de communication et de formation médiatisées. Paper presented at the Conference «Dispositifs et médiations des savoirs», at the University of Louvain-la-Neuve.Google Scholar
Pudelko, B., Legros, D.Georget, P. (2002) Les TIC et la construction des connaissances. In: Legros D. and Crinon J. (dirs), Psychologie des apprentissages multimédias. Paris: Armand Colin, 40–62.Google Scholar
Ruhleder, K.Jordan, B. (2001) Co-Constructing Non-Mutual Realities: Delay-Generated Trouble in Distributed Interaction. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10(1): 113–138.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., Bhatia, V., Li, D.Yung, V. (1999) Blurred genres and Fuzzy Identities in Hong-Kong public discourse: Foundational Ethnographic Issues in the Study of Reading. Applied Linguistics, 20(1): 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, J. A., Williams, E.Christie, B. (1976) The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G.Kester, L. (2005) The four-component instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In: Mayer, R. E. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 71–93.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2004) Supporting synchronous distance language learning with desktop videoconferencing. Language Learning & Technology, 8: 90–121. http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/wang/default.htmlGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. (2006) Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18(1): 122–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. (2007) Task design in videoconferencing-supported Distance Language Learning. CALICO Journal, 24(3): 591–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2002) A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL quarterly, 36(3): 453–475.Google Scholar
Weissberg, J. M. (1999) Présences à distance. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Yamada, M.Akahori, K. (2007) Social Presence in Synchronous CMC-based Language Learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1): 37–65.Google Scholar
Yamada, M.Akahori, K. (2008) Self-awareness effect on learner-centered communication in videoconferencing, EuroCALL 2008, 96–97.Google Scholar
Zähner, C., Fauverge, A.Wong, J. (2000) Task-Based Language Learning Via Audiovisual Networks. In: Warschauer, M. and Kern, R. (eds.), Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 186–203.Google Scholar