Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:03:19.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eyetracking methodology in SCMC: A tool for empowering learning and teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Ursula Stickler  and
Lijing Shi
Ursula Stickler
Affiliation:
The Open University, UK (email: [email protected])
Lijing Shi
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Sciences, UK (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Computer-assisted language learning, or CALL, is an interdisciplinary area of research, positioned between science and social science, computing and education, linguistics and applied linguistics. This paper argues that by appropriating methods originating in some areas of CALL-related research, for example human-computer interaction (HCI) or psycholinguistics, the agenda of “attention-focus” research can be shifted from a cognitive perspective to a learner-centred approach; understanding online language learning and teaching spaces as mediated by technology; second/foreign language learning; and online teaching culture.

Taking a method that has traditionally been used within a positivist paradigm, the authors exemplify the potential of eyetracking to advance online language learning research – extending it in ways compatible with a sociocultural paradigm. This is evidenced by two pioneering studies in which an innovative combination of methods allows participants, whose gaze focus was recorded during synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC), to reflect back on their involvement. Eyetracking is combined with stimulated recall interviews that trigger deep reflection on learner and teacher strategies by directing participants’ recollections on their attention focus.

The rich, multifaceted results shown by this original and innovative use of eyetracking methods in a sociocultural framework suggest a way forward in researching online learning by integrating insider and outside views coherently and systematically.

Keywords

eyetrackingSCMCsocioculturalmethodologyonline language learning
Type
Regular papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , May 2017 , pp. 160 - 177
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bee Bee, S. and Gardner, D. (2012) Crossing the borders in language learning through the use of web conferencing as an e learning tool. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 8(1): 120–132. doi: 10.1504/IJWBC.2012.044686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, P., Chik, A., Gao, X., Huang, J. and Wang, W. (2009) Qualitative research in language teaching and learning journals, 1997–2006. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1): 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, D. (2003) The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Caws, C. and Hamel, M.-J. (eds.). (2016) Language-learner computer interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001) The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cutrim Schmid, E. (2011) Video-stimulated reflection as a professional development tool in interactive whiteboard research. ReCALL, 23(3): 252–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougiamas, M. (1998) A journey into constructivism. https://dougiamas.com/archives/a-journey-into-constructivism/ Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A. (2000) Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Godfroid, A., Housen, A. and Boers, F. (2010) A procedure for testing the Noticing Hypothesis in the context of vocabulary acquisition. In: Pütz, M. and Sicola, L. (eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition. Inside the learner’s mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, M. (2005) Countering the “new orthodoxy” in educational research: A response to Phil Hodkinson. British Educational Research Journal, 31(2): 139–155. doi: 10.1080/0141192052000340189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R. (2009) Training teachers for the multimedia age: Developing teacher expertise to enhance online learner interaction and collaboration. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1): 35–50.Google Scholar
Jacob, R. J. and Karn, K. S. (2003) Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. In: Radach, R., Hyona, J. and Deubel, H. (eds.), The mind’s eye, cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 573–605.Google Scholar
Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. (1976) Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8(4): 441–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamy, M.-N. and Hampel, R. (2007) Online communication in language learning and teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (2000) Introducing sociocultural theory. In: Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–26.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2007) Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. In: van Patten, B. and Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 201–224.Google Scholar
Leow, R. P., Grey, S., Marijuan, S. and Moorman, C. (2014) Concurrent data elicitation procedures, processes, and the early stages of L2 learning: A critical overview. Second Language Research, 30(2): 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M., Hubbard, P., Stockwell, G. and Colpaert, J. (2014) Research challenges in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1): 1–6. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2014.987035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M. and Kennedy, C. (2004) A task-cycling pedagogy using stimulated reflection and audio-conferencing in foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2): 50–68.Google Scholar
Messmer, R. (2015) Stimulated recall as a focused approach to action and thought processes of teachers. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(1): n.p. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2051 Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. and Pernice, K. (2010) Eyetracking web usability. Berkeley: New Riders.Google Scholar
Örnberg Berglund, T. (2012) Corrective feedback and noticing in text-based second language interaction. In: Bradley, L. and Thouësny, S. (eds.), CALL: Using, learning, knowing. Dublin: Research-Publishing.net. doi: 10.14705/rpnet.2012.000058 Google Scholar
O’Rourke, B. (2012) Using eye-tracking to investigate gaze behaviour in synchronous computer-mediated communication for language learning. In: Dooley, M. and O’Dowd, R. (eds.), Researching online interaction and exchange in foreign language education: Theories, methods and challenges. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 305–342.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, B., Prendergast, C., Shi, L., Smith, B. and Stickler, U. (2015) Eyetracking in CALL – present and future. In: Gimeno Sanz, A., Levy, M., Blin, F. and Barr, D. (eds.), WorldCALL: Sustainability and computer-assisted language learning. London: Bloomsbury, 285–298.Google Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Frels, R. K. (2013) Introduction: Toward a new research philosophy for addressing social justice issues: Critical dialectical pluralism 1.0. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 7(1): 9–26. doi: 10.5172/mra.2013.7.1.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, A. and Ball, L. J. (2006) Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. In: Gaoui, C. (ed.), Encyclopedia of human computer interaction. London: Idea Group Reference, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K. (1978) Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 85(3): 618–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayner, K. (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3): 372–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayner, K. (2009) Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8): 1457–1506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riazi, A. M. and Candlin, C. N. (2014) Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2): 135–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Schwandt, T. A. (2000) Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructivism. In: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 189–213.Google Scholar
Shi, L., Stickler, U. and Lloyd, M. (in press) The interplay between attention, experience and skills in online language teaching. Language Learning in Higher Education, 7(1).Google Scholar
Smith, B. (2008) Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1): 85–103.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (2010) Employing eye-tracking technology in researching the effectiveness of recasts in CMC. In: Hult, F. M. (ed.), Directions and prospects for educational linguistics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 79–97. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9136-9_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. (2012) Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3): 53–81.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (2015) Tracking learner interaction in CMC. Paper presented at the BAAL/CUP Seminar: Eyetracking as a research method in online language education. Milton Keynes. 12–13 June 2015.Google Scholar
Smith, B. and Michel, M. (2014) Eye movements during SCMC: An examination of primed production. Paper presented at the EUROCALL 2014 Conference Groningen, The Netherlands. 20–23 August 2014.Google Scholar
Spinner, P., Gass, S. M. and Behney, J. (2013) Ecological validity in eye-tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2): 389–415. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stickler, U. (2015) Interpreting the silence online. Paper presented at the AAAL/ACLA Conference, Toronto, Canada. 21–24 March 2015.Google Scholar
Stickler, U. and Hampel, R. (2015) Qualitative research in CALL. CALICO Journal, 32(3): 380–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stickler, U. and Shi, L. (2014 Eye movements of online language teachers. Paper presented at the AILA, Brisbane, Australia. 10–15 August 2014.Google Scholar
Stickler, U. and Shi, L. (2015) Eye movements of online Chinese learners. CALICO Journal, 32(1): 52–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stickler, U. and Shi, L. (2016) BAAL/CUP Seminar 2015: Eyetracking as a research method in online language education. Language Teaching, 49(4): 596–598. doi: 10.1017/S0261444816000197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stickler, U., Smith, B. and Shi, L. (2016) Using eyetracking technology to explore online learner interactions. In: Caws, C. and Hamel, M.-J. (eds.), Language-learner computer interactions:Theory, methodology and CALL applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 163–186.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1994) The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4): 202–208.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (2007) Mediation. In: Daniels, H., Cole, M. and Wertsch, J. V. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 178–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winke, P. M., Godfroid, A. and Gass, S. M. (2013) Introduction to the special issue. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2): 205–212. doi: 10.1017/S027226311200085X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar