No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Decision-making on Information Technology in UK University Modern Language Departments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 December 2008
Extract
In an era in which universities are being encouraged to see the need for strategy development in general, and information systems strategy development in particular, this paper explores some of the influences upon decision-making about information technology in UK university Modern Language departments. Findings from a series of interviews with Modern Language department heads and departmental computing representatives are discussed.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1990
References
Ahmad, K, Corbett, G, Rogers, M & Sussex, R, Computers, Language Learning and Language Teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Brindley, L (ed). The Electronic Campus: An Information Strategy, Library & Information Research Report 73,The British Library Board, 1989, proceedings of a conference held on 28–30 October, 1988,at Banbury.Google Scholar
Cameron, K C, Dodd, W S & Rahtz, S P Q, Computers and Modern Language Studies, Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 1986.Google Scholar
CCTA, Guide to the Procurement Process for University Computers, funded by the Computer Board for Universities and Research Councils, May 1989.Google Scholar
Committee of Vice-Chancellors & Principals (CVCP) Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities, London: CVCP, March 1985.Google Scholar
Copperthwaite, N & Mellors, CEuropean Studies: A Discipline-Based Survey of Graduate Careers, London: University Association for Contemporary European Studies, 1990.Google Scholar
Earl, M J, ‘IT and Strategic Advantage: A Framework of Frameworks’ in Information Management: The Strategic Dimension, pp 33–53, edited by Earl, Michael J, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1988.Google Scholar
Earl, M J, Management Strategies for Information Technology, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall 1989.Google Scholar
Evans, C, Language People. The Experience of Teaching and Learning Modern Languages in British Universities, Milton Keynes: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hardy, C, ‘Using Content, Context and Process to Manage University Cutbacks’ in The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 17(1), pp 65–82, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, C, Langley, A, Mintzberg, H & Rose, J, ‘Strategy Formation in the University Setting’ in The Review of Higher Education, 6(4), pp 407–33, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschheim, R A, Smithson, S & Whitehouse, D, ‘A Survey of Microcomputer Use in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A UK University Study’ in Education and Computing, 4(2), pp 77–89, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschheim, R, Smithson, S & Whitehouse, D, Microcomputers and the Humanities. Survey and Recommendations, Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 1990.Google Scholar
Phillips, M, ‘Microcomputers and the Teaching of Literature’ in Literary and Linguistic Computing, 2(3), pp 176–84, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, B J, ‘CALL in UK Higher Education. A Preliminary Survey by the CTI Centre for Modern Languages’ in ReCALL No. 2, May 1990, pp1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, J B, Strategies for Change. Logical Incrementalism, Homewood, Illinois, Irwin, 1980.Google Scholar
Temple, P & Whitchurch, C (eds), Strategic Choice. Corporate Strategies for Change in Higher Education, Report by a CUA/APA Study Group, Chairman: Lowe M, produced in association with Touche Ross Management Consultants, 1990.Google Scholar
Universities Funding Council/Computer Board for Universities and Research Councils (UPC/CBURC) Information Technology and Computing Strategies, 1989Google Scholar