Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:12:51.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communicative CALL: focus on the interaction produced by CALL software

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Paul Seedhouse
Paul Seedhouse
Affiliation:
University of York, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept of communicative CALL has tended to suffer from a lack of definition. This article seeks a redefinition of communicative CALL by focussing on the interaction actually produced by learners through the use of software. A framework is proposed for planning communicative CALL which takes the target interaction as its starting point. Classroom research is presented as an example of how the framework could be used in practice, and the interaction produced by one item of software is evaluated.

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , December 1995 , pp. 20 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubrey, Fisher B.Perspectives on Human Communication, Macmillan, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
Cook, V. ‘Designing CALL programs for communicative teaching’. ELT Journal 42, 4, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, J. & Hawthorn, J. (eds.) Communication Studies, Arnold, London. 1980.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. & Beattie, G.The Psychology of Language and Communication, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London. 1986.Google Scholar
Hanneman, G. & McEwen, W. (eds.) Communication and Behavior, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.Google Scholar
Harre, R. & Lamb, R. (eds.) The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Psychology, Blackwell, Oxford, 1983.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. (ed.) System, 14, 2. 1986.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A.English for Specific Purposes, University Press, Cambridge. 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. K. (ed.) The Second Language Curriculum, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. ‘What is Communication?’ in Mellor, D. (ed.), Ways of Communicating, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
Jones, C. & Fortescue, S.Using Computers in the Language Classroom, Longman, London, 1987.Google Scholar
Nunan, D.The Learner-Centred Curriculum, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R. & Widdowson, H. (eds.), English in the World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. ‘Communicative Call: a contradiction in terms?’, ReCALL, 7, CTI Centre for Modern Languages, University of Hull, 1992.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. ‘Linking Pedagogical Purposes to Linguistic Patterns of Interaction: The Analysis of Communication in the Language Classroom’, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 4, 1994.Google Scholar
Underwood, J.Linguistics, computers, and the language teacher, Newbury House, Rowley, 1984.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume 3, Academic Press, London, 1985.Google Scholar
Wyatt, D. (ed.), Computer Assisted Language Instruction, Oxford: Pergamon. Oxford, 1984.Google Scholar