Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:15:18.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examining the conditions of using an on-line dictionary to learn words and comprehend texts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2017

Robert Francis Dilenschneider
Robert Francis Dilenschneider*
Affiliation:
Jichi Medical University, Japan (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated three look-up conditions for language learners to learn unknown target words and comprehend a reading passage when their attention is transferred away to an on-line dictionary. The research questions focused on how each look-up condition impacted the recall and recognition of word forms, word meanings, and passage comprehension. The participants were 84 first-year Japanese medical university students. The recall and recognition of word forms and word meanings, and passage comprehension data were analysed using the Rasch model. Probabilities of p<.05 were considered measurably different for the sample population used in this study, and probabilities of p<.003 were considered statistically significant and generalizable to a larger population. Overall, the results suggest three findings with regard to the on-line dictionary study. First, if only the results that were statistically significant are considered, there might be two conditions to learn words and comprehend reading passages: the spell condition seems to be best for learning the forms and meanings of words, and the control condition for promoting passage comprehension. Second, if the results that were both statistically significant and measurably different are considered, the spell, click, and control conditions might promote the learning of word forms, word meanings, and passage comprehension, respectively. Third, however, the click condition might promote both the learning of word meanings and passage comprehension because its effects were measurably higher to the spell condition on these measures. The results are consistent with the type of processing-resource allocation model for learning the forms and meanings of words and cognitive load theory for comprehending reading passages.

Keywords

on-line dictionaryvocabulary learningreading comprehensionlook-up retention
Type
Regular papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 4 - 23
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alharbi, M. A. (2016) Using different types of dictionaries for improving EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. JALT CALL Journal, 12(2): 123–149.Google Scholar
Al-Shehri, S. and Gitsaki, C. (2010) Online reading: A preliminary study of the impact of integrated and split-attention formats on L2 students’ cognitive load. ReCALL, 22(3): 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aust, R., Kelly, M. J. and Roby, W. (1993) The use of hyper-reference and conventional dictionaries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(4): 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297512 Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (2000) The effects of sentence writing as semantic elaboration on the allocation of processing resources and second language lexical acquisition (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/86185 Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (2002) Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52(2): 323–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00186 Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (2003) Effects of questions about word meaning during L2 Spanish lexical learning. The Modern Language Journal, 87(4): 546–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00207 Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (2004) Effects of sentence writing in second language lexical acquisition. Second Language Research, 20(4): 303–334. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658304sr233oa Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2012) Dictionary use and vocabulary learning in the context of reading. International Journal of Lexicography, 25(2): 216–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecr031 Google Scholar
Cho, K.-S. and Krashen, S. D. (1994) Acquisition of vocabulary from the Sweet Valley Kids series: Adult ESL acquisition. Journal of Reading, 37(8): 662–667.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2001) L2 reading on the web: Strategies for accessing information in hypermedia. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(5): 367–403. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.14.5.367.5775 Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. and Plass, J. L. (1996) Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2): 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01159.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T. (2011) Compleat Lexical Tutor (Version 8). http://www.lextutor.ca Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E. and Stanovich, K. E. (1990) Early spelling acquisition: Writing beats the computer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1): 159–162.Google Scholar
Dictionary.com. (n.d.) http://www.dictionary.com Google Scholar
Dziemianko, A. (2010) Paper or electronic? The role of dictionary form in language reception, production and the retention of meaning and collocations. International Journal of Lexicography, 23(3): 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecp040 Google Scholar
Dziemianko, A. (2011) Does dictionary form really matter? In Akasu, K. and Uchida, S. (eds.), ASIALEX2011 proceedings, Lexicography: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Kyoto: Asian Association for Lexicography, 92–101.Google Scholar
Dziemianko, A. (2012) Why one and two do not make three: Dictionary form revisited. Lexikos, 22: 195–216. https://doi.org/10.5788/22-1-1003 Google Scholar
Dziemianko, A. (2017) Dictionary form in decoding, encoding and retention: Further insights. ReCALL, 29(3): 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000131 Google Scholar
Goyette, E. S. (1997) The effects of dictionary usage on text comprehension. Humanities and Social Sciences, 57: 42–64.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M. and Greidanus, T. (1996) Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3): 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01614.x Google Scholar
Knight, S. (1994) Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3): 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02043.x Google Scholar
Koyama, T. and Takeuchi, O. (2003) Printed dictionaries vs. electronic dictionaries: A pilot study on how Japanese EFL learners differ in using dictionaries. Language Education & Technology, 40: 61–79.Google Scholar
Liu, T.-C. and Lin, P.-H. (2011) What comes with technological convenience? Exploring the behaviors and performances of learning with computer-mediated dictionaries. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1): 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.016 Google Scholar
Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J.-C. and Velay, J.-L. (2006) Remembering the orientation of newly learned characters depends on the associated writing knowledge: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Human Movement Science, 25(4–5): 646–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.007 Google Scholar
Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M.-T. and Velay, J.-L. (2005) The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica, 119(1): 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.019 Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster’s Learner’s Dictionary. (n.d.) http://learnersdictionary.com/ Google Scholar
Prichard, C. and Matsumoto, Y. (2011) The effect of lexical coverage and dictionary use on L2 reading comprehension. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 11(3): 207–225.Google Scholar
Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2): 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 Google Scholar
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G. and Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998) Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3): 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205 Google Scholar
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S. and Gordon, J. (1992) Early spelling acquisition: Does writing really beat the computer? Learning Disability Quarterly, 15(3): 223–228.Google Scholar