Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:39:50.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of topic interest and prior knowledge on text recall and annotation use in reading a hypermedia text in the L2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2010

Gülcan Erçetin
Gülcan Erçetin*
Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University, Faculty of Education, Department of Foreign Language Education, 34342 Bebek, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel: +90 212 359 4588; Fax: +90 212 257 5036 (email:[email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of topic interest and prior knowledge on text recall and annotation use of second language learners engaged in reading a hypermedia text. The participants were proficient learners of English enrolled in an undergraduate English Language Teaching programme. They were asked to read a hypermedia text that incorporated word-level and topic-level annotations, and complete an immediate recall task. Participants’ interaction with the text was recorded during the reading task. Data collection tools also included a topic interest questionnaire, a prior knowledge test, and semi-structured interviews. Results indicated no meaningful relationship between topic interest and prior knowledge. Moreover, topic interest had a significant main effect on text recall while prior knowledge did not. In other words, topic interest facilitated the number of propositions recalled. Finally, a significant interaction between topic interest and prior knowledge was found in terms of access to annotations. When topic interest was low, the participants with low prior knowledge utilized content-related annotations more frequently than those with high prior knowledge. On the other hand, when topic interest was high, the participants with high prior knowledge accessed content-related annotations more frequently than those with low prior knowledge.

Keywords

HypermediaL2 readingtext recallprior knowledgetopic interestannotation use
Type
Regular papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 228 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, M., Hidi, S.Berndorff, D. (2002) Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3): 545–561.Google Scholar
Akyel, A.Erçetin, G. (2009) Hypermedia reading strategies employed by advanced learners of English. System, 37: 136–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, C.Urquhart, A. (1988) This test is unfair. I’m not an economist. In: Carrell, P. L., Devine, J. and Eskey, D. (eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (2000) Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L.Kulikowich, J. M. (1995) Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87: 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M.Schulze, S. K. (1994) How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2): 313–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alptekin, C. (2006) Cultural familiarity in inferential and literal comprehension in L2 reading. System, 34(4): 494–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariew, R.Ercetin, G. (2004) Exploring the potential of hypermedia annotations for second language reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15: 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. S., Peleg-Bruckner, Z.McClintock, A. H. (1985) Effects of topic interest and prior knowledge on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20: 497–504.Google Scholar
Barry, S.Lazarte, A. (1998) Evidence for mental models: how do prior knowledge, syntactic complexity, and reading topic affect inference generation in a recall task for nonnative readers of spanish? The Modern Language Journal, 82(2): 176–193.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, E. B. (1991) Reading development in a second language: theoretical, empirical & classroom perspectives. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, E. B. (2005) Progress and procrastination in second language reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25: 133–150.Google Scholar
Bolter, J. D. (1991) Writing space: the computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brantmeier, C. (2003) Beyond linguistic knowledge: individual differences in second language reading. Foreign Language Annals, 36: 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantmeier, C. (2006) Toward a multicomponent model of interest and L2 reading: sources of interest, perceived situational interest, and comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18(2): 89–115.Google Scholar
Bügel, K.Buunk, B. P. (1996) Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: the role of interests and prior knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 80: 15–31.Google Scholar
Calisir, F.Gürel, Z. (2003) Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2): 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrell, P. L. (1988) Interactive text processing: implications for ESL/second language reading classrooms. In: Carrell, P. L., Devine, J. and Eskey, D (eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrell, P. L.Eisterhold, J. C. (1983) Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. In: Carrell, P. L., Devine, J. and Eskey, D. (eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 73–92.Google Scholar
Carrell, P. L.Wise, T. E. (1998) The relationship between prior knowledge and topic interest in L2 reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20: 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. (2003) English language learning and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S. Y.Ford, N. J. (1997) Towards adaptive information systems: individual differences and hypermedia. Information Research, 3(2). http://informationr.net/ir/3-2/paper37.html.Google Scholar
Chen, S. Y., Fan, N. J.Macredie, R. D. (2006) Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: experts vs novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2): 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C.Rada, R. (1996) Interacting with hypertext: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11: 125–156.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2006) CALL technologies for L2 reading. CALICO Monograph Series, 5: 69–98.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M.Payne, J. L. (2004) What makes students click: working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32: 481–503.Google Scholar
Davis, J. (1989) Facilitating effects of marginal glosses on foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73: 41–52.Google Scholar
Davis, J.Lyman-Hager, M. (1997) Computers and L2 reading: student performance, student abilities. Foreign Language Annals, 30: 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dee-Lucas, D. (1996) Effects of overview structure on study strategies and text representations for instructional hypertext. In: Rouet, J. F., Levonen, J. J., Dillon, A. and Spiro, R. J. (eds.), Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 73–108.Google Scholar
DeStefano, D.LeFevre, J. (2007) Cognitive load in hypertext reading: a review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 1616–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ercetin, G. (2003) Exploring ESL learners’ use of hypermedia reading glosses. CALICO Journal, 20: 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, W. (2004) Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24: 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammadou, J. (1991) Interrelationships among prior knowledge, inference, and language proficiency in foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 75: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidi, S. (1990) Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60: 549–571.Google Scholar
Hidi, S. (2001) Interest, reading, and learning: theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3): 1191–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillinger, M.Leu, D. J. (1994) Guiding instruction in hypermedia. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 266–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. (1982) Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 16: 503–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonassen, D. H. (1996) Computers in the classroom: mindtools for critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998) Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ko, M. H. (2005) Glosses, comprehension, and strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(2): 125–143.Google Scholar
Krapp, A. (1999) Interest, motivation and learning: an educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14: 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, K. A., Brown, S. W., Mills, R.Mayall, H. J. (2003) Knowledge, interest, recall and navigation: a look at hypertext processing. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(3): 911–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, K. A.Kulikowich, J. M. (1998) Domain knowledge, interest, and hypertext navigation: a study of individual differences. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(1): 51–69.Google Scholar
Leloup, J. W. (1993). The effect of interest level in selected text topics on second language reading comprehension. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Leu, D. J.Reinking, D. (1996) Bringing insights from reading research to research on electronic learning environments. In: van Oostendorp, H. and de Mul, S. (eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, 43–75.Google Scholar
Liao, Y. C. (1999) Effects of hypermedia on students’ achievement: a meta analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8: 255–278.Google Scholar
Lomicka, L. L. (1998) To gloss or not to gloss: an investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning and Technology, 1: 41–50.Google Scholar
Madrid, R. I., Van Oostendorp, H.Puerta Melguizo, M. C. (2008) The effects of the number of links and navigation support on cognitive load and learning with hypertext: the mediating role of reading order. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1): 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (1997) Multimedia learning: are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 2(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2001) Multimedia learning. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, S.Stevenson, R. J. (1996) Disorientation in hypertext: the effects of three text structures on navigation performance. Applied Ergonomics, 27(1): 61–68.Google Scholar
Mohammed, M. A.Swales, J. M. (1984) Factors affecting the successful reading of technical instructions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 2: 206–217.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2002) Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: a need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52: 439–481.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. (1995) Multimedia and hypertext: the Internet and beyond. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1985) Content familiarity and the perception of textual relationships in second language reading. RELC Journal, 16: 43–51.Google Scholar
Paivio, A. (1986) Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potelle, H.Rouet, J. F. (2003) Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(3): 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renninger, K. A. (1992) Individual interest and development: implications for theory and practice. In: Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S. and Krapp, A. (eds.), The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 361–376.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S.Krapp, A. (eds.) (1992) The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P.Plant, R. W. (1990) Emotions in nondirected text learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 2: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakar, A.Ercetin, G. (2005) Effectiveness of hypermedia annotations for foreign language reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21: 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W.Cañas, J. (2006a) Reading strategies and prior knowledge in learning from hypertext. Memory and Cognition, 34: 1157–1171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W.Cañas, J. (2006b) Coherence or interest as basis for improving hypertext comprehension. Information Design Journal, 14: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiefele, U. (1992) Topic interest and levels of text comprehension. In: Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S. and Krapp, A. (eds.), The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 151–182.Google Scholar
Schiefele, U. (1996) Topic interest, text representation, and quality of experience. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12: 3–18.Google Scholar
Schiefele, U.Krapp, A. (1996) Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and Individual Differences, 8: 141–160.Google Scholar
Schiefele, U., Krapp, A.Winteler, A. (1992) Interest as predictor of academic achievement: a meta-analysis of research. In: Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S. and Krapp, A. (eds.), The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 183–212.Google Scholar
Schraw, G., Bruning, R.Svoboda, C. (1995) Sources of situational interest. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27: 1–17.Google Scholar
Urquhart, S.Weir, C. (1998) Reading in a second language: process, product and practice. New York: Longman.Google Scholar