Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:27:40.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Up-scaling RP measures for emergency and post-emergency and theneed for refinements further to the ICRP general recommendations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2013

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the last few decades, the steady progress achieved in reducing planned exposures ofboth workers and the public has been admirable in the nuclear sector. However, thedisproportionate focus on tiny public exposures and radioactive discharges associated withnormal operations came at a high price, and the quasi-denial of a risk of major accidentand related weaknesses in emergency preparedness and response came at even higher price.Fukushima has unfortunately taught us that radiological protection (RP) for emergency andpost-emergency can be much more than a simple evacuation that lasts 24 to 48 hours withpeople safely returning to their homes shortly afterward. On optimization of emergency andpost-emergency exposures, the only “show in town” in terms of international RP policiesimprovements has been the issuance of the ICRP’s new general recommendations. However, nomatter how genuine these improvements were, they have not been “road tested” to thepractical reality of severe accidents. Post-Fukushima, there is a compelling case toreview the practical adequacy of key RP notions such as optimization, evacuation,sheltering, reference levels for workers and the public, and to amend these notions with aview to make the international RP system more useful in the event of a severe accident. Inpursuing further improvements to the international RP system, it should be clearly bornein mind that the system is generally based on protection against the risk of cancer andhereditary diseases. The system also protects against deterministic non-cancer effects ontissues and organs. In seeking refinements of such protection notions, we invite ICRP topay increased attention to the fact that a continued balance must be struck betweenbeneficial activities which cause exposures, and protection. The global nuclear industryis committed to help overcoming the above key RP issues as part of the RP community’supcoming international deliberations towards a more efficient international RP system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2013

References

IAEA (2011) Basic Safety Standards (BSS) for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources, Draft 5.0, 21 March 2011, Vienna, Austria.
ICRP Publication 103 (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection, Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4).