Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:58:04.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Invariant scaling relationships and their possible application in predicting radionuclide uptake in plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2009

K. A. Higley
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering & Radiation Health Physics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
D. P. Bytwerk
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering & Radiation Health Physics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Get access

Abstract

Scaling factors, used to predict radionuclide uptake as a function of mass, have tremendous potential to provide a more transparent approach to risk assessment. Although the historical literature might seem to offer a wealth of data for the purposes of testing these scaling relationships, a more defensible alternative may be to conduct new site-specific data collection efforts. Trace element analysis was conducted on 16 plant species from a single location in Oregon. Results for ten elements and six species exhibit mass dependence on trace-element uptake. Transfer factors calculated for several elements spanned only an order of magnitude across all plant species. Conversely, radionuclide data taken from the open literature was inconclusive in the analysis for mass effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Napier, B., R. Fellows and K. Krupka, Soil-to-Plant Concentration Ratios for Assessing Food-Chain Pathways in Biosphere Models (NUREG/CR-6941). 2007, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352.
Ehlken, S. and G. Kirchner, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2002. 58(2–3): p. 97–112.
Centofanti, T., et al., J Environ Qual, 2005. 34(6): p. 1972–1979. CrossRef
Maraziotis, E.A., Journal of Radiological Protection, 1992. 12: p. 77–84. CrossRef
Zhu, Y.G. and E. Smolders, Journal of Experimental Botany, 2000. 51(351): p. 1635–1645. CrossRef
Willey, N.J., S. Tang, and N.R. Watt,. J Environ Qual, 2005. 34(5): p. 1478–1489.
Nisbet, A.F. and R.F.M. Woodman, Health Physics ; VOL. 78 ; ISSUE: 3 ; PBD: Mar 2000, 2000: p. page(s) 279–288.
West, G.B., Brown, J.H. and Enquist, B.J., Science, 1987. 276(122–126).
Higley, K.A. and D.P. Bytwerk, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2007. 98(1–2): p. 4–23.
Beresford, N.A., et al., Journal of Radiological Protection, 2004. 24(4A): p. A89–A103.
Niklas, K.J. and B.J. Enquist, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. 98(5): p. 2922.
Castelan-Estrada, M., P. Vivin, and J.P. GaudilllEre, L. Ann Bot, 2002. 89(4): p. 401–408.
West, G.B. and J.H. Brown, Journal of Experimental Biology, 2005. 208(9): p. 1575–1592.
Niklas, K.J., Ann Bot, 2006. 97(2): p. 155–163.
Reich, P.B., et al., Nature, 2006. 439(7075): p. 457–461.
Enquist, B.J., et al., in Nature. 2007, Nature Publishing Group. p. 218–222.
Balter, V., Oecologia, 2004. 139(1): p. 83–88.
Seel, J.F., F.W. Whicker, and D.C. Adriano, Health Physics, 1995. 68(6): p. 793–799.
Whicker, F.W., et al., Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 1999. 45(1): p. 1–12. CrossRef
Twining, J.R., T.E. Payne and T. Itakura, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2004. 71(1): p. 71–87. CrossRef
Mollah A.S., B.A. and Ullah S.M., Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 1998. 37(2): p. 125–128. CrossRef
Landeen, D.S. and R.M. Mitchell, Health Phys.; Vol/Issue: 6, 1986: p. Pages: 769–774.
Yoshida, S. and Y. Muramatsu, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 1998. 41(2): p. 183–205.
Chou, F.-I., et al., Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2005. 80(2): p. 175–181. CrossRef
Reddy, B.V.S., et al., Field Crops Research, 2003. 84(1–2): p. 57–77.