Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:49:45.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the Belgian interventions levels and the new ICRPrecommendations for emergency exposures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2013

D. Braekers ,
C. Turcanu ,
G. Olyslaegers  and
J. Camps

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The new recommendations on emergency exposure situations of the International Commissionon Radiological Protection (ICRP) advise a reference level for the residual dose in arange of between 20 and 100 mSv effective dose (acute or per year). At the same time, theprotection strategy should account for the simultaneous consideration of all the exposurepathways, as well as all of the protective actions. Similarly to other countries, theactual Belgian nuclear emergency plan is based on individual projected doses (thyroidcommitted dose and total effective doses) and independent protective actions that mainlyfocus on the early phase of an emergency situation. The two approaches are compared inthis study on the basis of the projected and residual dose calculations obtained usingJRODOS and the Belgian Noodplan models for different radiological or nuclear accidentalscenarios. The comparison has been made by considering separately the early and the latephase contributions. The ingestion dose has been investigated from the predicteddeposition values and compared to the single level of the ICRP 109 recommendations.

Keywords

Nuclear and radiological emergencyBelgian intervention levelsICRP 109 recommendations
Type
Research Article
Information
Radioprotection , Volume 48 , Issue 5: First NERIS Platform Workshop – Preparedness fornuclear and radiological emergency response and recovery: Implementation of ICRPrecommendations , 2013 , pp. S111 - S116
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2013

References

Camps J. et al. (2010) The “NOODPLAN” early phase nuclear emergency models: an evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Third European IRPA Congress, 14- 18 June 2010, Helsinki, Finland.
Euratom (1987) Concil Regulation n°2218/89, Official Journal of the European Communities, July 1987, pp. 211-213.
Govaerts P. (1992) Afgeleide referentieniveaus ter ondersteuning van beslissingen in de landbouwsector in geval van een nukleair ongeval, Nukleair risiko en landbouw, IIIde sectie, pp. 120-131. Ministerie van volkgezondheid en leefmilieu.
ICRP Publication 109 (2009) Application of the Commission’s Recommendations for the Protection of People in Emergency Exposure Situations, Ann. ICRP 39 (1).
NEA (2003) Short-term Countermeasures in Case of a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, 1-111, ISBN: 92-64-02140-X.
Raskob, W., Trybushnyi, D., Ievdin, I., Zheleznyak, M. (2011) JRODOS: Platform for improved long term countermeasures modelling and management, Radioprotection 46 (6), S731-S736. Google Scholar
Royal Decree (17-10-2003), Arrêté royal portant fixation du plan d’urgence nucléaire et radiologique pour le territoire belge.
Salacz, J. (1985) Reprocessing of irradiated Uranium-235 for the production of Mo-99, I-131, Xe-133 radioisotopes, Revue IRE 9, 22-28. Google Scholar