Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:46:38.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiological protection in ITER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2007

H. Maubert
Affiliation:
ITER Organisation, Cadarache Joint Work site, 13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France.
T. Pinna
Affiliation:
ENEA FUS/TEC, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044, Frascati, Rome, Italy.
M.-T. Porfiri
Affiliation:
ENEA FUS/TEC, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044, Frascati, Rome, Italy.
S. Ciattaglia
Affiliation:
ITER Organisation, Cadarache Joint Work site, 13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France.
Get access

Abstract

ITER will be the first fusion reactor producing much more energy than that necessary to establish and heat the plasma. This nuclear energy is mainly exported from the plasma by neutrons and deposited in the plasma facing components, generating nuclear activation. One of the elements used in the fusion reaction is tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen. Although some feedback may be used from in service fusion machines, such as JET in England, the ITER radiological protection issues need to be assessed as early as possible. The protection against radiological hazards is, as usual shielding, waiting for radioactive decay, limitation of airborne contaminants, reduction of exposure time, etc. This has been done in the present design and has followed a first step of ALARA studies. Radiation fields have been calculated and work effort estimated leading to the evaluation of a collective yearly dose of 356 p mSv, below the project dose target which is 500 p mSv. A second step of occupational radiological exposure studies should allow refining further the dose estimate as well as the ALARA optimization.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

How J. (Ed.) (2007) Project Integration Document, PID, January 2007.
Iida H., Khripunov V., Petrizzi L., Federerici G. (2004) Nuclear Analysis Report (NAR), July 2004.
IAEA (2002) Safety Reports Series 21, Optimisation of Radiation Protection in the Control of Occupational Exposure.
ITER (2004a) Generic Site Safety Report, GSSR, Vol. VI, Occupational Safety, July 2004.
ITER (2004b), Generic Site Safety Report, GSSR, Vol. XI, Safety Models and Codes, July 2004.
ITER (2004c) Design Description Document 2.3, Remote Handling equipment, July 2004.
ITER (2006) Design Description Documents, current baseline.
Massaut V. (2006) personal communication.
Natalizio A., Porfiri M.T. (2005) FUS-TN-SA-SE-R-140, revision of the ORE assessment for the Port-Interfacing Systems, ENEA, December 2005.
Natalizio A., Patel B., Porfiri M.T. (2003) ENEA FUS-TN-SA-SE-R-85, Collection and critical evaluation of the ORE data available at JET on the basis of existing documents, October 2003.
Pinna T. (2005) Occupational Radiation Exposure: Software Tool and Hands-on Activities for Remote Handling Assessment, ENEA-FUS-TN-SA-SE-R-137, December 2005.