Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:47:10.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-term effect of fertilization on 137Cs concentration in Scots pine needles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2012

J. Barescut ,
D. Lariviere ,
T. Stocki ,
L. Aro  and
A. Rantavaara
L. Aro
Affiliation:
Finnish Forest Research Institute, Parkano Unit, Kaironiementie 15, FI-39700 Parkano, Finland
A. Rantavaara
Affiliation:
Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, P.O. Box 14, FI-00881 Helsinki, Finland
Get access

Abstract

Long-term observations on the effects of a fertilization treatment on 137Cs concentrations in forest vegetation are scarce. Needles of Scots pine were used as biological indicators of radionuclide uptake of trees. The fertilization experiments are located in western Finland in an area where radioactive contamination from the Chernobyl accident in 1986 was relatively high (22–75 kBq m−2) compared to other parts of Finland. Fertilization treatments included different combinations of major nutrients, i.e. nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and calcium. Needle 137Cs concentrations of Scots pine were analyzed during 1991–2006. The effect of fertilization on 137Cs concentration was tested 5 to 20 years after radioactive contamination from the Chernobyl accident in 1986. Fertilization clearly decreased 137Cs concentration in Scots pine needles 1–21 growing seasons after application. Single K fertilization decreased significantly 137Cs concentration 21 growing seasons after radioactive deposition on a drained mire. Mineral nutrients (application of commercial fertilizer or wood ash) can well be recommended for remediation of forests contaminated by accidental radionuclide deposition. The site conditions need to be taken into account in planning of remediation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radioprotection , Volume 46 , Issue 6: ICRER 2011 – International Conference on Radioecology & Environmental Radioactivity: Environment & Nuclear Renaissance , 2011 , pp. S479 - S482
Copyright
© Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Levula T., Saarsalmi A. and Rantavaara A., For. Ecol. Manage 126 (2000) 269-279.
Aro L., Rantavaara A., Raitio H. and Vetikko V., Radioprotection – Colloques 37(C1) (2002) 427-432.
Kaunisto S., Aro L. and Rantavaara A., Environ. Pollut. 117(1) (2002) 111-119.
Kaunisto S., Aro L. and Rantavaara A., Radioprotection – Colloques 37(C1) (2002) 569-572.
Rantavaara A. and Raitio H.,Radioprotection – Colloques 37(C1) (2002) 565-568.
Rantavaara A. and Aro L., Radioprotection 44(5) (2009) 927-932.
Zibold G., Klemt E., Konopleva I. and Konoplev A., J. Environ. Radioact. 100 (2009) 489-496.
Vetikko V., Rantavaara A. and Moilanen M., J. Environ. Radioact. 101 (2010) 1055-1060.
Rosén K., Vinichuk M., Nikolova I. and Johanson K., J. Environ. Radioact. 102 (2011) 178-184.
Derome J., Saarsalmi A. and Kukkola M., Boreal Env. Res. 14 (2009) 861-874.
Rautjärvi H., Kaunisto S. and Tolonen T., Suo 55 (2004) 21-32.
Klemola S. and Leppänen A., 1997. GAMMA-97 e Gamma-Ray Spectrum Analysis Program. Documentation and User’s Manual. Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Helsinki.