Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:32:11.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Workshop On 14C Data Reporting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Minze Stuiver*
Affiliation:
Departments of Geological Sciences and Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of the workshop was to clarify any possible confusion related to the reporting 14C data. Two areas of concern, the use of the new NBS oxalic acid standard (Cavallo and Mann, 1980), and the reporting of marine sample ages, were singled out for detailed discussions.

Type
Calibration and Data Reporting
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science

References

Cavallo, L M and Mann, W B, 1980, New National Bureau of Standards contemporary carbon-14 standards, in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 3, p 962963.Google Scholar
Craig, Harmon, 1957, Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass-spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide: Geochim et Cosmochim Acta, v 12, p 133149.Google Scholar
Karlén, I, Olsson, I U, Kållberg, P, and Kilici, S, 1968, Absolute determination of the activity of two 14C dating standards: Arkiv Geofysik, v 4, no. 22, p 465471.Google Scholar
Mook, W G, 1980, The effect of fossil fuel and biogenic CO2 on the 13C and 14C content of atmospheric carbon dioxide, in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 2, p 392397.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze and Polach, H A, 1977, Discussion: Reporting of 14C data: Radiocarbon, v 19, p 355363.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze and Robinson, S W, 1974, University of Washington Geosecs North Atlantic carbon-14 results: Earth and Planetary Sci Letters, v 23, p 8790.Google Scholar