Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:26:35.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Value of 210Pb in Dating Scandinavian Aquatic and Peat Deposits∗

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Farid El-Daoushy
Farid El-Daoushy*
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Box 530, S-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sediment and peat chronologies have been further improved allowing alternative radiometric methods to complement 14C dating. Lacustrine and coastal marine sediments as well as peat deposits in various parts in Scandinavia are studied using 137Cs, 210Pb, 14C and other methods primarily to evaluate the 210Pb but also to extend the 14C chronology. The sampling sites have various sources of input and are characterized by different geochemical, depositional, and post-depositional conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , 1986 , pp. 1031 - 1040
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Battarbee, R C and Digerfeldt, G, 1976, Palaeoecological studies of the recent development of Lake Växjösjön: Archiv f Hydrobiol, v 77, no. 3, p 330–346.Google Scholar
Chanton, J P, Martens, C S and Kipput, G W, 1983, Lead-210 sediment geochronology in a changing coastal environment: Geochim et Cosmochim Acta, v 47, p 1791–1804.Google Scholar
Davis, A O, Galloway, J N and Nordstrom, D K, 1982, Lake acidification: its effect on lead in the sediment of two Adirondack lakes: Limnol Oceanog, v 27, p 163–167.Google Scholar
Dearing, J A, Håkansson, H, Liedberg, B, Persson, A, Skansjö, S, Widholm, D and El-Daoushy, F, 1986, Towards quantifying sediment and nutrient fluxes in past lake-catchment ecosystems: A casestudy in S Sweden: Oikos, in press.Google Scholar
El-Daoushy, M F A F, 1981, An ionization chamber and a Si-detector for lead-210 chronology: Nuclear Instruments & Methods, v 188, p 647–655.Google Scholar
El-Daoushy, F, 1986, Scandinavian limnochronology of sediments and heavy metals: Hydrobiol, in press.Google Scholar
El-Daoushy, F and Johansson, K, 1983, Radioactive lead-210 and heavy metal analyses in four Swedish lakes: Ecol Bull (Stockholm), v 35, p 555–570.Google Scholar
El-Daoushy, F and Tolonen, K, 1984, Lead-210 and heavy metal contents in dated ombrotrophic peat hummocks from Finland: Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, v 223, p 392–399.Google Scholar
El-Daoushy, F, Tolonen, K and Rosenberg, R, 1982, Lead-210 and moss-increment dating of two Finnish Sphagnum hummocks: Nature, v 296, no. 5856, p 429–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlenkeuser, H and Pederstad, K, 1984, Recent sediment accumulation in Skagerrak as depicted by 210Pb-dating: Norsk Geol Tidsskr, v 2, p 135–152.Google Scholar
Fyfe, W S, 1981, The environmental crisis: quantifying geosphere interactions: Science, v 213, p 105–110.Google Scholar
Krishnaswamy, S and Lal, D, 1978, Radionuclide limnochronology, in Lerman, A, ed, Lakes; chemistry, geology, physics: New York, Springer-Verlag, p 153–177.Google Scholar
Nydal, R, 1963, Increase in radiocarbon from the most recent series of thermonuclear tests: Nature, v 200, no. 4903, p 212–214.Google Scholar
Oldfield, F and Appleby, P G, 1984, Empirical testing of 210Pb-dating models for lake sediments, in Haworth, F Y and Lund, J W G, eds, Lake sediments and environmental history: Great Britain, Leicester Univ Press, p 93–124.Google Scholar
Oldfield, F, Appleby, P G, Cambray, R S, Eakins, J D, Barber, K E, Battarbee, R W, Pearson, G W and Williams, J M, 1979, 210Pb, 137Cs and 239Pu profiles in ombrotrophic peat: Oikos,, v 33, p 40–45.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U, 1979, A warning against radiocarbon dating of samples containing little carbon: Boreas, v 8, p 203–207.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U, El-Daoushy, F and Vasari, Y, 1983, Säynäjälampi and the difficulties inherent in dating of sediments in a hard-water lake: Hydrobiol, v 103, p 5–14.Google Scholar
Pennington, W, Cambray, R S, Eakins, J D and Harkness, D D, 1976, Radionuclide dating of the recent sediments of Blelham Tarn: Freshwater Biol, v 6, p 317–331.Google Scholar
Robbins, J A, 1978, Geochemical and geophysical applications of radioactive lead, in Nriagu, J O. ed, The biogeochemistry of lead in the environment, Part A: Amsterdam, Elsevier, p 285–393.Google Scholar
Smith, I N and Walton, A, 1980, Sediment accumulation rates and geochronologies measured in the Saguenay Fjord using the 210Pb dating method: Geochim et Cosmochim Acta, v 44, p 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, 1978, Radiocarbon timescale tested against magnetic and other dating methods: Nature, v 273, p 271–274.Google Scholar
Thompson, R, Bloemendal, J, Dearing, J A, Oldfield, F, Rummery, T A, Stober, J C and Turner, G M, 1980, Environmental applications of magnetic measurements: Science, v 207, p 481–486.Google Scholar