Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:59:26.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Radiocarbon Measurements in Atmospheric Studies1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

M R Manning
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
D C Lowe
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
W H Melhuish
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
R J Sparks
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Gavin Wallace
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
C A M Brenninkmeijer
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
R C McGill
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

14C measured in trace gases in clean air helps to determine the sources of such gases, their long-range transport in the atmosphere, and their exchange with other carbon cycle reservoirs. In order to separate sources, transport and exchange, it is necessary to interpret measurements using models of these processes. We present atmospheric 14CO2 measurements made in New Zealand since 1954 and at various Pacific Ocean sites for shorter periods. We analyze these for latitudinal and seasonal variation, the latter being consistent with a seasonally varying exchange rate between the stratosphere and troposphere. The observed seasonal cycle does not agree with that predicted by a zonally averaged global circulation model. We discuss recent accelerator mass spectrometry measurements of atmospheric 14CH4 and the problems involved in determining the fossil fuel methane source. Current data imply a fossil carbon contribution of ca 25%, and the major sources of uncertainty in this number are the uncertainty in the nuclear power source of 14CH4, and in the measured value for δ 14C in atmospheric methane.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 The American Journal of Science 

References

Cleveland, W S 1979 Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Jour Am Statistical Assoc 74: 829836.Google Scholar
Cleveland, W S, Freeny, E and Graedel, T E 1983 The seasonal component of atmospheric CO2: Information from new approaches to the decomposition of seasonal time series. Jour Geophys Research 88: 1093410946.Google Scholar
Cleveland, W S and McRae, J E 1989 The use of loess and STL in the analysis of atmospheric CO2 and related data. In Elliott, W P, ed, The statistical treatment of CO2 data records. NOAA Tech Memo ERL ARL-173, Silver Spring, Maryland.Google Scholar
Davidson, J A, Cantrell, C A, Tyler, S C, Shetter, R E, Cicerone, R J and Calvert, J G 1987 Carbon kinetic isotope effect in the reaction of CH4 with HO. Jour Geophys Research 92: 21952199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehhalt, D H 1973 Methane in the atmosphere. In Carbon and the biosphere. Brookhaven symposium in biology , 24th, Proc. Upton, New York, USAEC, CONF-720510.Google Scholar
Enting, I G 1987 On the use of smoothing splines to filter CO2 data. Jour Geophys Research 92: 1097710984.Google Scholar
Enting, I G and Pearman, G I 1983 Refinements to a one-dimensional carbon cycle model. CSIRO Div Atmos Research tech paper 3.Google Scholar
Fraser, P J, Hyson, P, Rasmussen, R A, Crawford, A J and Khalil, M A K 1986 Methane, carbon monoxide and methylchloroform in the Southern Hemisphere. Jour Atmos Chem 4: 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golombek, A and Prinn, R G 1986 A global three-dimensional model of the circulation and chemistry of CFCl3, CF2Cl2, CH3CCl3, CCl4, and N2O. Jour Geophys Research 91: 39854001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimann, M and Keeling, C D 1986 Merìdional eddy diffusion model of the transport of atmospheric carbon dioxide, 1. Seasonal carbon cycle over the tropical Pacific ocean. Jour Geophys Research 91: 77657781.Google Scholar
Karlen, I, Olsson, IU, Kallberg, P and Kilicci, S 1964 Absolute determination of the activity of two 14C dating standards. Arkiv Geofysik 4: 465471.Google Scholar
Keeling, C D, Mook, W G and Tans, P P 1979 Recent trends in the 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Nature 277: 121123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, M A K and Rasmussen, R A 1983 Sources, sinks and seasonal cycles of atmospheric methane. Jour Geophys Research 88: 51315144.Google Scholar
Lal, D and Peters, B 1962 Cosmic ray produced isotopes and their application to problems in geophysics. Progress in elementary particle and cosmic ray physics. Amsterdam, North Holland 6: 174.Google Scholar
Levin, I (ms) 1985 Atmospheric CO2 in continental Europe—An alternative approach to clean air CO2 data. Paper presented at IAMAP mtg, Atmospheric carbon dioxide its sources, sinks, and global transport, Kandersteg, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Schoch-Fischer, H, Bruns, M, Münnich, M, Berdau, D, Vogel, J C and Münnich, K O 1985, 25 years of tropospheric 14C observations in central Europe. Radiocarbon 27(1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, J A, Prather, M J, Wofsy, S C and McElroy, M B 1981 Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspective. Jour Geophys Research 86: 72107254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, D C, Brenninkmeijer, CAM, Manning, M R, Sparks, R and Wallace, G 1988 Radiocarbon determination of atmospheric methane at Baring Head, New Zealand. Nature 332: 522525.Google Scholar
Mahlman, J D, Levy, H and Moxim, W J 1980 Three dimensional tracer structure and behaviour as simulated in two ozone precursor experiments. Jour Atmos Sci 37: 655685.Google Scholar
Mahlman, J D and Moxim, W J 1978 Tracer simulation using a global general circulation model: results from a midlatitude instantaneous source experiment. Jour Atmos Sci 35:13401374.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nydal, R and Lovseth, K 1983 Tracing bomb 14C in the atmosphere 1962–1980. Jour Geophys Research 88: 36213642.Google Scholar
Oeschger, H, Siegenthaler, U, Schotterer, U and Gugelmann, A 1975 A box diffusion model to study the carbon dioxide exchange in nature. Tellus 27: 168192.Google Scholar
Peng, T-H, Broecker, W S, Freyer, H D and Trumbore, S 1983 A deconvolution of the tree ring based δ13C record. Jour Geophys Research 88: 36093620.Google Scholar
Plumb, R A and Mahlman, J D 1987 The zonally averaged transport characteristics of the GFDL general circulation /transport model. Jour Atmos Sci 4:298326.Google Scholar
Plumb, R A and McConalogue, D D 1988 On the meridional structure of long-lived tropospheric constituents. Jour Geophys Research 93: 15,89715,913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinec, P, Chudy, M and Sivo, A 1986 Anthropogenic radiocarbon: past present and future. In Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc. Radiocarbon 28(2A): 668672.Google Scholar
Prinn, R, Cunnold, D, Rasmussen, R, Simmonds, P, Alyea, F, Crawford, A Fraser, P and Rosen, R 1987 Atmospheric trends in methylchloroform and the global average for the hydroxyl radical. Science 238: 945950.Google Scholar
Rafter, T A 1955 14C variations in nature and the effect on radiocarbon dating. New Zealand Jour Sci Tech 37: 2038.Google Scholar
Rafter, T A and Fergusson, G J 1959 Atmospheric radiocarbon as a tracer in geophysical circulation problems. In United Nations peaceful uses of atomic energy , Internatl conf, 2nd, Proc. London, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Rafter, T A and O'Brien, B J 1970 Exchange rates between the atmosphere and the ocean as shown by recent C14 measurements in the south Pacific. In Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology , Nobel symposium, 12th, Proc. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Reinsch, C M 1967 Smoothing by spline functions. Num Math 10:177183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarmiento, J L and Gwinn, E 1986 Strontium 90 fallout prediction. Jour Geophys Research 91: 76317646.Google Scholar
Schell, W R, Sauzay, G and Payne, B R 1974 World distribution of environmental tritium. In Physical behaviour of radioactive contaminants in the atmosphere , IAEA and WMO symposium, Proc. Vienna, IAEA-STI/PUB/354, IAEA.Google Scholar
Steele, L P, Fraser, P J, Rasmussen, R A, Khalil, M A K, Conway, T J, Crawford, A J, Gammon, R H, Masarie, K A and Thoning, K W 1987 The global distribution of methane in the troposphere. Jour Atmos Chem 5: 125171.Google Scholar
Stevens, C M and Engelkemeir, A 1988 Stable carbon isotopic composition of methane from some natural and anthropogenic sources. Jour Geophys Research 93: 725733.Google Scholar
Stevens, C M, Krout, L, Walling, D and Venters, A 1972 The isotopic composition of atmospheric carbon monoxide. Earth Planetary Sci Letters 16: 147165.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M and Polach, H A 1977 Discussion: Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3): 355363.Google Scholar
Taylor, C B 1968 A comparison of tritium and strontium-90 fallout in the southern hemisphere. Tellus 20: 559576.Google Scholar
Telegadas, K 1971 The seasonal atmospheric distribution and inventories of excess carbon-14 from March 1955 to July 1969. US Atomic Energy Comm rept HASL-243.Google Scholar
Trabalka, J R, ed 1985 Atmospheric carbon dioxide and the global carbon cycle. US Dept Energy rept DOE/ER-0239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, S C, Blake, D R and Rowland, F S 1987 13C/12C ratio in methane from the flooded Amazon forest. Jour Geophys Research 92: 10441048.Google Scholar
Volz, A, Ehhalt, D H and Derwent, R G 1981 Seasonal and latitudinal variation of 14CO and the tropospheric concentration of OH radicals. Jour Geophys Research 86: 51635171.Google Scholar
Walker, J C G 1977 Evolution of the atmosphere. New York, MacMillan.Google Scholar