Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:39:43.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

University of Wisconsin Radiocarbon Dates XXVII

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Christine A. Prior  and
Lori F. Phelps
Christine A. Prior*
Affiliation:
Center for Climatic Research, Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1225 West Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 USA
Lori F. Phelps
Affiliation:
Center for Climatic Research, Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1225 West Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 USA
*
Present address: Department of Anthropology, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Riverside, California 92512 USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Procedures and equipment used in the University of Wisconsin laboratory have been described previously (Bender, Bryson & Baerreis 1965; Steventon & Kutzbach 1986). Except as otherwise indicated, wood, charcoal and peat samples are pretreated with dilute NaOH-Na4P2O7 and dilute HCl before conversion to counting gas methane; when noted, marls and lake cores are treated with acid only.

Type
Date Lists
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , 1992 , pp. 141 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Bender, M. M., Bryson, R. A. and Baerreis, D. A. 1965 University of Wisconsin radiocarbon dates I. Radiocarbon 7: 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakeslee, D. and Caldwell, W. 1979 The Nebraska Phase: An Appraisal. Reprints in Anthropology 18. Lincoln, Nebraska, J&L Reprint Company.Google Scholar
Broihahn, J. H., Penman, J. T. and Rusch, L. 1987 Transportation archaeology in Wisconsin: The 1986 field season. Wisconsin Department of Transportation Archaeology Report 13.Google Scholar
Graves, J. (ms.) 1984 The Indian Hills site (33WO4). Archaeological reflections of a protohistoric assistaeronon town. M.A. thesis, University of Toledo, Ohio.Google Scholar
Knox, J. C. 1985 Responses of floods to Holocene climatic change in the Upper Mississippi Valley. Quaternary Research 23: 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, J. C. 1987 Historical valley floor sedimentation in the upper Mississippi Valley. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77: 224–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, J. T. 1984 Archaeology of the Great River Road: Summary report. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Archaeology Report 10.Google Scholar
Rusch, L. A. (ms.) 1988 Archaeological test excavations at the Dowser (OU100), Tews (OU102), Cabbage Patch (OU103), and Cleo's (OU104) sites, Outagamie County, Wisconsin. Report on file at the State Historic Preservation Office & State Historical Society of Wisconsin Museum.Google Scholar
Steventon, R. L. and Kutzbach, J. E. 1986 University of Wisconsin radiocarbon dates XXIII. Radiocarbon 28(3) 1206–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steventon, R. L. and Kutzbach, J. E. 1988 University of Wisconsin radiocarbon dates XXV: Radiocarbon 30(3): 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stothers, D. and Abel, T. 1989 The position of the “Pearson complex” in the late prehistory of northern Ohio. Archaeology of Eastern North America: 192 p.Google Scholar
Stothers, D. and Graves, J. 1985 The Prairie Peninsula co-tradition. Archaeology of Eastern North America 13: 153–175.Google Scholar
Stothers, D. and Pratt, G. 1980 Cultural continuity and change in the region of the Western Lake Basin. Toledo Area Aboriginal Research Bulletin 9: 1–38.Google Scholar
Swain, A. (ms.) 1981 Final report to the national park service on forest and disturbance history of Apostle Islands. Center for Climatic Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Wright, H. E., Seltzer, G. and Hanson, B. 1989 Glacial and climatic history of the central Peruvian Andes. National Geographic Research 5: 439–446.Google Scholar