Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:55:38.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates XI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

H. R. Crane  and
James B. Griffin
H. R. Crane
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
James B. Griffin
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The following is a list of dates obtained since the time of the compilation of List X in December 1964. The method is essentially the same as that used for the work described in the previous list. Two CO2-CS2 Geiger counter systems are used. The equipment and counting techniques have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961). The dates and estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conferences of 1962 and 1965, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of the Libby half-life, 5570 yr, (b) A.D. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale, and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In previous Michigan date lists up to and including VII we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statistical errors of counting, in order to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many sources of error in the dating process, we suggest he double the figures that are given in this list.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 8 , 1966 , pp. 256 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Albrecht, A. C., 1944, The location of the historic Natchez villages: Jour. Mississippi Hist., v. 6, no. 2, p. 67–89.Google Scholar
Bell, R. E., 1953, Pottery vessels from the Spiro Mounds: Oklahoma Anthrop. Soc. Bull., no. 1, p. 25–38.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R., 1963a, The Hodges site, a late archaic burial station: Anthropol. Papers, Mus. of Anthropol., Univ. of Michigan, no. 19, p. 124–148.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R., 1963b, The Pomranky site, a late archaic burial station: Anthropol, Papers, Mus. of Anthropol., Univ. of Michigan, no. 19, p. 149–192.Google Scholar
Borhegyi, S. F. de, 1960, Pre-Columbian cultural connections between Meso-America and Ecuador: Mid. Am. Res. Rec., v. 2, no. 7.Google Scholar
Broecker, W. S., and Farrand, W. R., 1963, Radiocarbon age of Two Creeks forest bed, Wisconsin: Geol. Soc. Bull., v. 74, p. 795–802.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. E., 1961, Caddoan radiocarbon dates: Bull. Texas Archaeol. Soc., no. 31, p. 145–151.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., 1961, The CO2-CS2 geiger counter: Rev. Sci. Instruments, v. 32, p. 953.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, J. B., 1960, University of Michigan radiocarbon dates V: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 2, p. 31–48.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, J. B., 1964, University of Michigan radiocarbon dates IX: Radiocarbon, v. 6, p. 1–24.Google Scholar
DeJarnette, D. L., Kurjack, E. B., and Cambron, J. W., 1962, Excavations at the Stanfield-Worley Bluff Shelter: Jour. Alabama Archaeol., v. 8, no. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Dreimanis, Aleksis, 1964, Lake Warren and Two Creeks interval: Jour. Geol., v. 72, p. 247–250.Google Scholar
Dunlevy, M. L., 1936, A comparison of the cultural manifestations at the Burkett and the Gray-Wolfe site: Chap. Nebraska Archaeol., v. 1, p. 147–248.Google Scholar
Fewkes, J. W., 1924, Preliminary archaeological explorations at Weeden Island, Florida: Smith. Misc. Coll., v. 76, no. 13, p. 1–26.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. W., and McNutt, C. H., 1962, Text excavations at Pinson mounds, 1961: Tennessee Archaeol., v. 18, no. 1, p. 1–13.Google Scholar
Fitting, J. E., 1965, Late woodland culture of southeastern Michigan: Anthropol. Papers, Mus. of Anthropol., Univ. of Michigan, no. 24.Google Scholar
Fitting, J. E., in press, Radiocarbon dating the Younge tradition: Am. Antiquity, v. 32, no. 2.Google Scholar
Grange, R. T. Jr., 1962, Ceramic relationships in the central plains: Univ. of Arizona, unpub. dissertation.Google Scholar
Gruhn, Ruth, 1961, The archaeology of Wilson Butte cave, south central Idaho: Occas. Papers, Idaho State College Mus., no. 6.Google Scholar
Hough, J. L., 1953, The prehistoric Great Lakes of North America: Am. Sci., v. 51, no. 1, p. 84–110.Google Scholar
Hurt, W. R., 1961, Archaeological work at the Tabor and Arp sites: Mus. News, W. H. Over Mus., Vermillion, South Dakota, v. 22, no. 8, p. 1–6.Google Scholar
Hurt, W. R., 1963, The 1962 excavations of the Sherman Park Mound site, 39MN8, a newly radiocarbon date site in South Dakota: Mus. News, W. H. Over Mus., Vermillion, South Dakota, v. 24, no. 1, p. 1–4.Google Scholar
Jelinek, A. J., 1960, An archaeological survey of the middle Pecos River and the adjacent Llano Estacado: Univ. of Michigan, Univ. Microfilms, Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Kivett, M. F., 1958, The Oacoma site, Lyman County, South Dakota: ms., Nebraska State Hist. Soc.Google Scholar
Mayr, Thomas, 1958, The Ruf site: and influence from Pennsylvania: Eastern States Archaeol. Fed. Bull., no. 17, p. 15.Google Scholar
Neitzel, R. S., Archeology of the Fatherland site: The Grand Village of the Natchez: Anthropol. Papers of Am. Mus. Nat, Hist., v. 51, pt. 1.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B., 1958, The Pinsons Mounds: Tennessee Archaeol., v. 14, no. 1, p. 1–8.Google Scholar
Oltz, D. F., and Kapp, R. O., 1963, Plant remains associated with mastodon and mammoth remains in central Michigan: Am. Mid. Nat., v. 70, no. 2, p. 339–346.Google Scholar
Orr, K. G., 1946, The archaeological situation at Spiro, Oklahoma, a preliminary report: Am. Antiquity, v. 11, no. 4, p. 228–255.Google Scholar
Orr, K. G., 1952, Survey of Caddoan area archaeology: in Archaeol. of the Eastern United States, ed. by Griffin, J. B., p. 239–256.Google Scholar
Phillips, Phillip, Ford, J. A., and Griffin, J. B., 1951, Archaeological survey in lower Mississippi alluvial valley, 1940–1947: Papers of Peabody Mus. of Am. Archaeol. and Ethnol., Harvard Univ., v. 25, p. 195–147.Google Scholar
Smith, P. E. L., 1964, Radiocarbon dating of a Late Paleolithic culture from Egypt: Science, v. 145, p. 811.Google Scholar
Spaulding, A. C., 1958, The significance of differences between radiocarbon dates: Am. Antiquity, v. 23, no. 3, p. 309–311.Google Scholar
Stephenson, R. L., Ferguson, A. L. L., and Ferguson, H. G., 1963, The Accokeek site, a middle Atlantic seabord culture sequence: Anthropol. Papers, Mus. of Anthropol., Univ. of Michigan, no. 20.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze, and Deevey, E. S., 1962, Yale natural radiocarbon measurements VII: Radiocarbon, v. 4, p. 250–262.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze, Deevey, E. S., and Rouse, I., 1963, Yale natural radiocarbon measurements VIII: Radiocarbon, v. 5, p. 312–341.Google Scholar
Swanson, E. H. Jr., Butler, R., and Bonnichen, R., 1964, Birch Creek papers no. 2, natural and cultural stratigraphy in the Birch Creek Valley of eastern Idaho: Papers of the Idaho Univ. Mus., Moscow, Idaho, no. 14.Google Scholar
Tamers, M. A., Pearson, F. J. Jr., and Davis, Mott E., 1964, The University of Texas radiocarbon dates II: Radiocarbon, v. 6, p. 138–159.Google Scholar
Washburn, A. L., and Stuiver, Minze, 1962, Radiocarbon dated postglacial delevelling in northeast Greenland and its implications: Arctic, v. 15, p. 66–73.Google Scholar
Wedel, Waldo R., 1943, Archeological investigations in Platte and Clay counties, Missouri: Smithsonian Inst., U.S. Natl. Bull. no. 183.Google Scholar