Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T02:18:18.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultra-Small Carbon Samples and the Dating of Sediments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

J S Vogel ,
Madeleine Briskin ,
D E Nelson  and
J R Southon
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radiocarbon dates from sediment core samples are usually obtained on the whole organic carbon portion in order to use as little of the valuable sediment as possible. Such measurements may not result in an accurate chronology of the sediment because the material may include carbon from different reservoirs at the time of deposition. The development of AMS techniques for dating ultra-small (20–500μg) carbon samples permits dating various components of cored sediments. We give examples of physical and chemical fractions of sediments which illustrate the large differences in ages obtainable from materials at the same sediment depth. The dating of all or several of these fractions demands more complex interpretations than just the derivation of a sedimentation rate from whole organic carbon dates.

Type
II. Carbon Cycle in the Environment
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 31 , Issue 3: June 20-25, 1988 Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia , 1989 , pp. 601 - 609
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Batten, R J, Gillespie, R, Gowlett, J A J and Hedges, R E M, 1986, The AMS dating of separate fractions in archaeology, in Stuiver, M and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2A, p 698–701.Google Scholar
Bauer, J E, Spies, R B and Vogel, J S ms, Natural 14C abundances in microgram samples of organic, dissolved inorganic and faunal carbon in sediments associated with marine petroleum seepage: ms subm to Science.Google Scholar
Briskin, M, Robins, J, Reidel, W R and Booker, R, 1986, Magnetic resonance imaging analyses of varved marine sedimentary records of the Gulf of California: Geophys Research Letters, v 13, p 753–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, S E, Vogel, J S and Southon, J R, 1987, Carbon accumulation rates and the origin of the Holocene sapropel in the Black Sea: Geology, v 15, p 918–921.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degens, E T, Reuter, J H and Shaw, K N F, 1964, Biochemical compounds in offshore California sediments and sea water: Geochim et Cosmichim Acta, v 28, p 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A J, Gillespie, R, and Hedges, R E M, 1986, Radiocarbon dating of sediments, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no, 2A, p 441–450.Google Scholar
Håkanson, L and Jansson, M, 1983, Principles of lake sedimentology: Berlin, Springer-Verlag, p 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiwatari, R, 1985, Geochemistry of humic substances in lake sediments, in Aiken, G R, McKnight, D M, Wershaw, R L and MacCarthy, , eds, Humic substances in soil, sediment, and water-geochemistry, isolation and characterization: New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, p 147–180.Google Scholar
Peteet, D M, Vogel, J S, Nelson, D E, Southon, J R, Nickman, R J and Heusser, L E ms, AMS 14C dating of macrofossils indicates presence of Younger-Dryas climatic reversal in northeastern USA: ms subm to Quaternary Research.Google Scholar
Ramunni, A U and Palmieri, F, 1985, Use of ultrasonic treatment for extraction of humic acid with inorganic reagents from soil: Organic Geochem, v 8, p 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D A and Degens, E T, 1974, Recent sediments of Black Sea, in The Black Sea – geology, chemistry and biology: Am Assoc Petroleum Geologists, mem 20, p 183–199.Google Scholar
Shackleton, N J and Hall, M A, 1982, Oxygen isotope study of continuous scrape samples from site 480: Initial repts deep sea drilling proj, v 64, pt 2, p 1251–1254.Google Scholar
Spiker, E C and Simoneit, B R T, 1982, Radiocarbon dating of recent sediments from leg 64, Gulf of California: Initial repts deep sea drilling proj, v 64, pt 2, p 757–758.Google Scholar
Vandenbroucke, M, Pelet, R and Debyser, Y, 1985, Geochemistry of humic substances in marine sediments, in Aiken, G R, McKnight, D M, Wershaw, R L and MacCarthy, , eds, Humic substances in soil, sediment, and water – geochemistry, isolation and characterisation: New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, p 249–273.Google Scholar
Vogel, J S, Nelson, D E and Southon, J R, 1987, 14C background levels in an accelerator mass spectrometry system: Radiocarbon, v 29, no. 3, p 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar