Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:51:43.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time History of a Human Kidney Stone Determined by Bomb-Pulse Dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2016

Vladimir A Levchenko
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Locked Bag 2001 Kirrawee DC, NSW 2232 Australia.
A Alan Williams
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Locked Bag 2001 Kirrawee DC, NSW 2232 Australia.

Abstract

An in vivo grown human kidney stone was dated using the atmospheric bomb pulse. The growth period was found to be 17.6 yr for a sample size of 6 mm across. The step dissolution method was used, as one of several possibilities, to produce depositional subsamples. A noticeable dead carbon presence is detected in the modern industrialized diet, and as a consequence in human metabolites. The importance for correction when applying bomb-pulse dating is noted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bergmann, O, Bhardwaj, RD, Bernard, S, Zdunek, S, Barnabe-Heider, F, Walsh, S, Zupicich, J, Alkaas, K, Buchholz, BA, Druid, H, Jovinge, S, Frisen, J. 2009. Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science 324(5923):98102.Google Scholar
Bhardwaj, RD, Curtis, MA, Spalding, KL, Buchholz, BA, Fink, D, Björk-Eriksson, T, Nordborg, C, Gage, FH, Druid, H, Eriksson, PS, Frisén, J. 2006. Neocortical neurogenesis in humans is restricted to development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103(33):12,564568.Google Scholar
Druffel, EM, Mok, HYI. 1983. Time history of human gallstones: application of the post-bomb radiocarbon signal. Radiocarbon 25(2):629636.Google Scholar
Fink, D, Hotchkis, M, Hua, Q, Jacobsen, G, Smith, AM, Zoppi, U, Child, D, Mifsud, C, van der Gaast, H, Williams, A, Williams, M. 2004. The ANTARES AMS facility at ANSTO. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:109115.Google Scholar
Georgiadou, E, Stenström, K. 2010. Bomb-pulse dating of human material: modeling the influence of diet. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):800807.Google Scholar
Holmes, RP, Assimos, DG. 2004. The impact of dietary oxalate on kidney stone formation. Urological Research 32(5):311316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, RP, Kennedy, M. 2000. Estimation of the oxalate content of foods and daily oxalate intake. Kidney International 57:16621667.Google Scholar
Hua, Q. 2009. Radiocarbon: a chronological tool for the recent past. Quaternary Geochronology 4(5):378390.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Zoppi, U, Williams, AA, Smith, AM. 2004. Small-mass AMS radiocarbon analysis at ANTARES. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:284292.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Barbetti, M, Rakowski, AZ. 2013. Atmospheric radiocarbon for the period 1950–2010. Radiocarbon 55(4):20592072.Google Scholar
Hughes, JR, Levchenko, VA, Blanksby, SJ, Mitchell, TW, Williams, A, Truscott, RJW. 2015. No turnover in lens lipids for the entire human lifespan. eLife 4:e06003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishnamurthy, M, Hruska, KA, Chandhoke, PS. 2003. The urinary response to an oral oxalate load in recurrent calcium stone formers. Journal of Urology 169(6):20302033.Google Scholar
Lynnerup, N, Kjeldsen, H, Heegaard, S, Jacobsen, C, Heinemeier, J. 2008. Radiocarbon dating of the human eye lens crystallines reveal proteins without carbon turnover throughout life. PLoS ONE 3:e1529.Google Scholar
Massey, LK. 2003. Dietary influences on urinary oxalate and risk of kidney stones. Frontiers in Bioscience 8:584594.Google Scholar
Norén, C. 2002. Evaluation of CO2-fertilization of a greenhouse with flue gases from a microturbine, Svenskt Gastekniskt Center [WWW document]. URL: http://www.sgc.se/ckfinder/userfiles/files/SGCA32.pdf Google Scholar
Spalding, KL, Bhardwaj, RD, Buchholz, BA, Druid, H, Frisén, J. 2005a. Retrospective birth dating of cells in humans. Cell 122(1):133143.Google Scholar
Spalding, KL, Buchholz, BA, Bergman, L-E, Druid, H, Frisén, J. 2005b. Age written in teeth by nuclear tests. Nature 437(7057):333334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stenhouse, MJ. 1979. Further application of bomb 14C as a biological tracer: In Berger R, Suess HE, editors. Radiocarbon Dating, Proceedings of the 9th International Radiocarbon Conference. Berkeley: University of California Press. p 342–52.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, MJ, Baxter, MS. 1977. Bomb 14C as a biological tracer. Nature 267:828832.Google Scholar
Taig, L. 2009. Protected cropping in Australia. ISS Institute Report [WWW document]. URL: http://issinstitute.org.au/wp-content/media/2011/05/ISS-FEL-REPORT-L-TAIG-low-res.pdf Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J, Beijers, JPM. 2011. Radiocarbon in food: a non-problem of health effects. Environmental Chemistry Letters 9(2):167168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zoppi, U, Skopec, Z, Skopec, J, Jones, G, Fink, D, Hua, Q, Jacobsen, G, Tuniz, C, Williams, A. 2004. Forensic applications of 14C bomb-pulse dating. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:770775.Google Scholar