Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:11:43.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic Biases in Results of the International Collaborative Study and Their Probable Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Mieczysław F Pazdur ,
Romuald Awsiuk ,
Tomasz Goslar  and
Anna Pazdur
Mieczysław F Pazdur
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University, Krzywoustego 2, PL-44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Romuald Awsiuk
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University, Krzywoustego 2, PL-44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Tomasz Goslar
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University, Krzywoustego 2, PL-44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Anna Pazdur
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University, Krzywoustego 2, PL-44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Results of the International Collaborative Study show an unexpectedly large scatter of individual dates as well as systematic biases. Very high values of linear correlation coefficients are observed for all results of Stage 2 and for benzene samples of Stage 1. We observed moderate correlations for carbonate samples and the lowest for natural samples of wood and peat of Stage 3. The correlation is practically negligible among results obtained in different stages. The probable reasons for such effects are seen in medium-term changes in the calibration of the counting systems.

Type
Session II
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 32 , Issue 3: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercomparison of Radiocarbon Laboratories , 1990 , pp. 289 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Arnold, JR and Libby, WF 1951 Radiocarbon dates. Science 113(2927): 111–120.Google Scholar
International Study Group 1982 An inter-laboratory comparison of radiocarbon measurements in tree rings. Nature 298: 619–623.Google Scholar
Pazdur, MF, Walanus, A and Mościcki, W 1978 A method of continuous examination of counting efficiency during measurements of natural radiocarbon by CO2 filled proportional counter. Nuclear Instruments & Methods 151: 541–547.Google Scholar
Polach, HA 1989 Liquid scintillation 14C spectrometry: Errors and assurances. in Long, A and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 13th, Proc. Radiocarbon 31(3): 327–331.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Aitchison, TC, Harkness, DD, Baxter, MS and Cook, GT 1989 An interim progress report on Stages 1 and 2 of the International Collaborative Program. in Long, A and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 13th, Proc. Radiocarbon 31(3): 414–421.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Baxter, MS, Aitchison, TC, Harkness, DD and Cook, GT 1986 Announcement of a new collaborative study for intercalibration of 14C dating laboratories. Radiocarbon 28(1): 167–169.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Baxter, MS, Harkness, DD, Aitchison, TC and Cook, GT, in press, Recent progress of the International Calibration of Radiocarbon Laboratories. in Mook, WG and Waterbolk, HT, eds, Internatl symposium Archaeology and 14C, 2nd, Proc. PACT. Google Scholar