Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T00:44:29.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

STONE-PAVED CELLARS IN THE STONE AGE? ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR A NEOLITHIC SUBTERRANEAN CONSTRUCTION FROM NYGÅRDSVEJ 3, FALSTER, DENMARK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2024

Marie Brinch*
Affiliation:
Museum Lolland-Falster, Frisegade 40 Nykøbing, Nykobing Falster 4800, Denmark
Bente Philippsen
Affiliation:
Museum Lolland-Falster, Frisegade 40 Nykøbing, Nykobing Falster 4800, Denmark NTNU Vitenskapsmuseet - Nasjonallaboratoriene for datering, Trondheim, Norway
Daniel Groß
Affiliation:
Museum Lolland-Falster, Frisegade 40 Nykøbing, Nykobing Falster 4800, Denmark
Marie Kanstrup
Affiliation:
Aarhus University – Aarhus AMS Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

We present the excavation results from a Middle Neolithic site associated with the Funnel Beaker Culture. Within two overlying house phases, a recessed area was recorded, which had been constructed using different sized pebbles. The arrangement and form of the feature clearly indicated anthropogenic origin and is understood as belonging to one of the house phases. Consequently, it is interpreted as a cellar. Several pits and post holes are additional features that were recorded at the site and indicate the presence of a fence structure with up to seven parallel courses. In this paper, we present radiocarbon dates from the features and an age model for the construction and use of the cellar as well as the fences. Moreover, the site Nygårdsvej 3 will be placed in its regional archaeological landscape.

Type
Conference Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 24th Radiocarbon and 10th Radiocarbon & Archaeology International Conferences, Zurich, Switzerland, 11–16 Sept. 2022

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, NH. 1997. The Sarup enclosures. The Funnel Beaker Culture of the Sarup site including two causewayed camps compared to the contemporary settlements in the area and other European Enclosures. Højbjerg: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Brinch, M. 2019. Two-aisled houses from the Neolithic period on North Falster. In: Sparrevohn, LR, Kastholm, OT, Nielsen, PO, editors. Houses for the living. Two-aisled houses from the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age in Denmark. Copenhagen: University Press of Southern Denmark. p 115122.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009a. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009b. Dealing with outliers and offsets in radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 51(3):10231045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brozio, JP, Dörfler, W, Feeser, I, Kirleis, W, Klooß, S, Müller, J. 2014. A Middle Neolithic well from Northern Germany: a precise source to reconstruct water supply management, subsistence economy, and deposition practices. Journal of Archaeological Science 51:135153. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, RA, Comstock, AR 2014. Evaluating the old wood problem in a temperate climate: a Fort Ancient case study. American Antiquity 79(4):763775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidsen, K. 1978. The Final TRB Culture in Denmark. A settlement study. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Ethelberg, P, Pedersen, SL. 2019. The two-aisled house - a summary on the current state of knowledge for Southern Jutland. In: Sparrevohn, LR, Kastholm, OT, Nielsen, PO, editors. Houses for the living. Two-aisled houses from the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age in Denmark. Copenhagen: University Press of Southern Denmark. p 367384.Google Scholar
Fabricius, K, Becker, CJ, Hulthén, B. 1996. Stendyngegrave og kulthuse: studier over Tragtbægerkulturen i Nord- og Vestjylland. København: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Fischer, A, Olsen, J. 2021. The Nekselø fish weir and marine reservoir effect in Neolithization Period Denmark. Radiocarbon 63(3):805820. DOI: 10.1017/RDC.2021.14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furholt, M. 2014. What is the Funnel Beaker complex? Persistent troubles with an inconsistent concept. In: Furholt M, Hinz M, Mischka D, Noble G, Olausson D editors. Landscapes, Histories and Societies in the Northern European Neolithic. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt. p 17–26.Google Scholar
Hage, F. 2016. Büdelsdorf-Borgstedt: eine trichterbecherzeitliche Kleinregion. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Iversen, RH. 2015. The transformation of Neolithic societies: an eastern Danish perspective on the 3rd millennium BC. Højbjerg: Jutland Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Kim, J, Wright, D, Hwang, J, Kim, J, Oh, Y. 2019. The old wood effect revisited: a comparison of radiocarbon dates of wood charcoal and short-lived taxa from Korea. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 11:34353448. doi: 10.1007/s12520-018-0766-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, L. 2012. Mid Neolithic enclosures in southern Scandinavia. In: Gibson, A, editor. Enclosing the Neolithic: recent studies in Britain and Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. p 109123. [accessed 2021 Oct 28]. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/fulcrum.f4752j56n.Google Scholar
Molin, F, Stenvall, J. 2010. Keramik och långhus – Exempel på bosättningar från trattbägarkultur i Östergötland. In Situ Archaeologica 9:105–115.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 2012. Mesolithisch – neolithisch: Zur Entwicklung von Hütten und Häusern im südlichen Skandinavien und nördlichen Mitteleuropa. Offa 69/70:249–264.Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. 1987. An Early Neolithic Pottery Deposition at Ellerødgård I, Southern Zealand. Journal of Danish Archaeology 6(1):6377. doi: 10.1080/0108464X.1987.10589977.Google Scholar
Olsen, J, Tikhomirov, D, Grosen, C, Heinemeier, J, Klein, M. 2017. Radiocarbon analysis on the new AARAMS 1 MV Tandetron. Radiocarbon 59(3):905913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, P, Austin, W, Bard, E, et al. 2020. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62(4):725757. doi: 10.1017/RDC.2020.41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
QGIS Development Team. 2021. QGIS Geographic Information System.Google Scholar
Sarnäs, P, Nord Paulsson, J, McDonald, C, Rudebeck, E. 2001. Öresundsförbindelsen. Rapport över arkeologisk slutundersökning Skjutbanorna 1B & Elinelund 2A-B. Malmö: Malmö kulturmiljö.Google Scholar
Schiffer, MB. 1986. Radiocarbon dating and the “old wood” problem: the case of the Hohokam chronology. Journal of Archaeological Science 13: 1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjögren, K-G, Fischer, A. 2023. The chronology of Danish dolmens. Results from 14C dates on human bones. Journal of Neolithic Archaeology 25:133.Google Scholar
Skaarup, J. 1975. Stengade: ein langeländischer Wohnplatz mit Hausresten aus der frühneolithischen Zeit. Rudkøbing: Langelands Museum.Google Scholar
Sparrevohn, LR, Kastholm, OT, Nielsen, PO, editors. 2019. Houses for the living. Two-aisled houses from the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age in Denmark. Copenhagen: University Press of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Reporting of C-14 data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytical condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research B 5:289293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L, Liu, H. 2006. An efficient method for identifying and filling surface depressions in digital elevation models for hydrologic analysis and modelling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20(2):193213. doi: 10.1080/13658810500433453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, M, Müller, J, Hinz, M. 2019. Diversified monuments: a chronological framework of the creation of monumental landscapes in prehistoric Europe. In: Müller J, Hinz M, Wunderlich M, editors. Megaliths – societies – landscapes. Early monumentality and social differentiation in Neolithic Europe. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt. p 25–29.Google Scholar