Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:44:33.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Single-Year German oak and Californian Bristlecone Pine 14C Data at the Beginning of the Hallstatt Plateau from 856 BC to 626 BC

Part of: IntCal 20

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2020

Simon M Fahrni*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
John Southon
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Benjamin T Fuller
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA Department of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, School of Culture and Society, Aarhus University, Moesgård Allé 20, DK-8270, Højbjerg, Denmark
Junghun Park
Affiliation:
Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, 124 Gwahang-no. Yuseong-gu, Daejeon34132, Korea
Michael Friedrich
Affiliation:
Institute of Botany, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Raimund Muscheler
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Lukas Wacker
Affiliation:
Institute of Particle Physics, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
R E Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

As part of the ongoing effort to improve the Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon (14C) calibration curve, this study investigates the period of 856 BC to 626 BC (2805–2575 yr BP) with a total of 403 single-year 14C measurements. In this age range, IntCal13 was constructed largely from German and Irish oak as well as Californian bristlecone pine 14C dates, with most samples measured with a 10-yr resolution. The new data presented here is the first atmospheric 14C single-year record of the older end of the Hallstatt plateau based on an absolutely dated tree-ring chronology. The data helped reveal a major solar proton event (SPE) which caused a spike in the production rate of cosmogenic radionuclides around 2610/2609 BP. This production event is thought to have reached a magnitude similar to the 774/775 AD production event but has remained undetected due to averaging effects in the decadal calibration data. The record leading up to the 2610/2609 BP event reveals a 11-yr solar cycle with varying cyclicity. Features of the new data and the benefits of higher resolution calibration are discussed.

Type
Conference Paper
Copyright
© 2020 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Deceased

References

REFERENCES

Adolphi, F, Muscheler, R. 2016. Synchronizing the Greenland ice core and radiocarbon timescales over the Holocene – Bayesian wiggle-matching of cosmogenic radionuclide records. Clim. Past 12:1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, CW. 1969. A 7104-year annual tree-ring chronology for bristlecone pine, pinus aristate, from the white mountains, California. Tree-Ring Bulletin 29(3-4):329.Google Scholar
Friedrich, M, Remmele, S, Kromer, B, Hofmann, J, Spurk, M, Kaiser, KF, Orcel, C, Küppers, M. 2004. The 12,460-year Hohenheim oak and pine tree-ring chronology from central Europe—a unique annual record for radiocarbon calibration and paleoenvironment reconstructions. Radiocarbon 46(3):11111122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinsted, A, Moore, JC, Jevrejeva, S. 2004. Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series: Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 11:561566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jull, AJT, Panyushkina, I, Miyake, F, Masuda, K, Nakamura, T, Mitsutani, T, Lange, TE, Cruz, RJ, Baisan, C, Janovics, R, Varga, T, Molnár, M. 2018. More rapid 14C excursions in the tree-ring record: a record of different kind of solar activity at about 800 BC? Radiocarbon 60(4): 12371248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melott, AL, Thomas, BC. 2012. Causes of an AD 774–775 14C increase. Nature 491:E1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mekhaldi, F, Muscheler, R, Adolphi, F, Aldahan, A, Beer, J, McConnell, JR, Possnert, G, Sigl, M, Svensson, A, Synal, H-A, Welten, KC, Woodruff, TE. 2015. Multiradionuclide evidence for the solar origin of the cosmic-ray events of AD 774/5 and 993/4. Nature Communications 6:8611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, F, Nagaya, K, Masuda, K, Nakamura, T. 2012. A signature of cosmic-ray increase in AD 774–775 from tree rings in Japan. Nature 486:240242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, F, Masuda, K, Nakamura, T. 2013. Another rapid event in the carbon-14 content of tree rings. Nature Communications 4:1748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Hare, P, Mekhaldi, F, Adolphi, F, Raisbeck, G, Aldahan, A, Anderberg, E, Beer, J, Christl, M, Fahrni, S, Synal, H-A, Park, J, Possnert, G, Southon, J, Bard, E, ASTER team, Muscheler, R. 2019. Multiradionuclide evidence for an extreme solar proton event around 2610 BP (~660 BC). PNAS 116(13):59615966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J, Southon, J, Fahrni, S, Creasman, PP, Mewaldt, R. 2017. Relationship between solar activity and delta C-14 peaks in AD 775, AD 994, and 660 BC. Radiocarbon 53(4):11471156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatte, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffman, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):18691887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, G, Moore, R, Southon, J, Griffin, S, Hinger, E, Zhang, D. (2007). AMS 14C sample preparation at the KCCAMS/UCI facility: Status report and performance of small samples. Radiocarbon 49(2):255269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southon, J, Magana, AL. 2010. A comparison of cellulose extraction and ABA pretreatment methods for AMS 14C dating of ancient wood. Radiocarbon 52(3):13711379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Braziunas, TF. 1993. Sun, ocean, climate and atmospheric 14CO2: an evaluation of causal and spectral relationships. The Holocene 3(4):289305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, K, Sakurai, H, Takahashi, Y, Sato, T, Gunji, S, Tokanai, F, Matsuzaki, H, Tsuchiya, YS. 2010. Precise comparison of 14C ages from choukai jindai cedar with IntCal04 raw data. Radiocarbon 52(4):15991609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, RE, Beaumont, WC, Southon, J, Stronach, D, Pickworth, D. 2010. Alternative explanations for anomalous 14C ages on human skeletons associated with the 612 BCE destruction of Nineveh. Radiocarbon 52(2-3):372382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, RE, Southon, J. 2013. Reviewing the mid-first Millennium BC 14C “warp” using 14C/bristlecone pine data. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:440443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrence, C, Compo, GP. 1998. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 79:6178.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar