Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:49:11.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semi-Automated Equipment for CO2 Purification and Graphitization at the A.E. Lalonde AMS Laboratory (Ottawa, Canada)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Gilles St-Jean ,
William E Kieser ,
Carley A Crann Open the ORCID record for Carley A Crann [Opens in a new window]  and
Sarah Murseli
Gilles St-Jean
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and A.E. Lalonde Lab, University of Ottawa, 25 Templeton St., Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
William E Kieser
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and A.E. Lalonde Lab, University of Ottawa, 150 Louis Pasteur, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
Carley A Crann*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and A.E. Lalonde Lab, University of Ottawa, 25 Templeton St., Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
Sarah Murseli
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and A.E. Lalonde Lab, University of Ottawa, 25 Templeton St., Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New computer-controlled, semi-automatic systems were designed and built for CO2 purification and graphitization at the A.E. Lalonde Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) Laboratory with consideration for user friendliness and high throughput. The stainless steel vacuum lines are orbitally welded to ensure clean seams with low memory. The insulated graphitization ovens with plug-in electrodes provide a hazard-free environment for operators. The closed-loop cooling system circulating low-viscosity Dynalene at –40°C provides highly efficient water trapping. The LabVIEWTM software features (1) pressure and temperature recording for QA/QC; (2) safety interlocks to preclude operator errors resulting in sample loss, cross-contamination, or damaging a vacuum pump; and (3) automation for leak checking, iron conditioning, and running samples. Results from the first year of routinely measured standards, reference, and background materials are reproducible and within acceptance values. In the first year of operation (commissioned in spring 2014), over 1000 targets (~60% unknowns) were produced. With new tube sealing and CO2 purification lines, and two more graphitization lines now operational, the Lalonde AMS Laboratory is able to provide routine radiocarbon analysis (>200 µg carbon) at a capacity of more than 7000 targets per year. Most importantly, the equipment is safe and intuitive, making it ideal for education and training students to run their own samples.

Keywords

graphitizationCO2 purificationclosed-loop coolingautomationLabVIEWorbital welding
Type
Advances in Physical Measurement Techniques
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 59 , Special Issue 3: Proceedings of the 22nd International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 2 of 2) , June 2017 , pp. 941 - 956
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 2015 Radiocarbon Conference, Dakar, Senegal, 16–20 November 2015

References

REFERENCES

Aerts-Bijma, AT, Meijer, HAJ, van der Plicht, J. 1997. AMS sample handling in Groningen. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physical Research B 123(1–4):221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aerts-Bijma, AT, van der Plicht, J, Meijer, HAJ. 2001. Automatic AMS sample combustion and CO2 collection. Radiocarbon 43(2):293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, M, Bard, E, Maurice, P, Duplessy, J-C. 1987. 14C dating with the Gif-sur-Yvette Tandetron accelerator: status report. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physical Research B 29(1–2):120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crann, CA, Murseli, S, St-Jean, G, Zhao, X-L, Kieser, WE. 2016. First status report on radiocarbon sample preparation techniques at the A.E. Lalonde AMS Laboratory (Ottawa, Canada). Radiocarbon, this issue. DOI:10.1017/RDC.2016.55.Google Scholar
Hut, G, Göte Östlund, H, van der Borg, K. 1986. Fast and complete CO2-to-graphite conversion for 14C accelerator mass spectrometry. Radiocarbon 28(2A):186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, BJL, Reyes, AV, Froese, DG, Stone, DB. 2013. The Palisades is a key reference site for the middle Pleistocene of eastern Beringia: new evidence from paleomagnetics and regional tephrostratigraphy. Quaternary Science Reviews 63:91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, K, Tokanai, F, Anshita, M, Sakurai, H, Ohashi, MS. 2014. Automated sample combustion and CO2 collection system with IRMS for 14C AMS in Yamagata University, Japan. Radiocarbon 56(1):327–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieser, WE, Zhao, X-L, Clark, ID, Cornett, RJ, Litherland, AE, Klein, M, Mous, DJW, Alary, J-F. 2015. The André E. Lalonde AMS Laboratory – the new accelerator mass spectrometry facility at the University of Ottawa. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361:110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, H, Masuzawa, T, Nakamura, T, Matsumoto, E. 1993. A batch preparation method for graphite targets with low background for AMS 14C measurement. Radiocarbon 35(2):295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretschmer, W, Anton, G, Bergmann, M, Finckh, E, Kowalzik, B, Klein, M, Leigart, M, Merz, S, Morgenroth, G, Piringer, I. 1997. The Erlangen AMS facility: status report and research program. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 123(1–4):93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, IA, Hedges, REM. 1990. A semi-automated bone pretreatment system and the pretreatment of older and contaminated samples. Radiocarbon 31(3):247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNichol, AP, Gagnon, AR, Jones, GA, Osborne, EA. 1992. Illumination of a black box: analysis of gas composition during graphite target preparation. Radiocarbon 34(3):321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Němec, M, Wacker, L, Gäggeler, H. 2010. Optimization of the automated graphitization system AGE-1. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):1380–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, A, McNichol, AP, Schneider, RJ, von Reden, KF, Zheng, Y. 1998. Microscale AMS 14C measurement at NOSAMS. Radiocarbon 40(1):61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, AV, Froese, DG, Jensen, BJL. 2010. Permafrost response to last interglacial warming: field evidence from non-glaciated Yukon and Alaska. Quaternary Science Reviews 29(23–24):3256–3274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozanski, K. 1991. Consultants’ group meeting on 14C reference materials for radiocarbon laboratories. February 18–20, 1991, Vienna, Austria. Internal Report, IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar
Rozanski, K, Stichler, W, Gonfiantini, R, Scott, EM, Beukens, RP, Kromer, B, van der Plicht, J. 1990. The IAEA 14C intercomparison exercise 1990. Radiocarbon 34(3):506–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, GM, Mazon, M, Southon, JR, Rifai, S, Moore, R. 2007. Evaluation of iron and cobalt powders as catalysts for 14C-AMS target preparation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physical Research B 259(1):308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sie, SH, Leaney, F, Gillespie, R, Suter, GF, Ryan, CG. 1994. Radiocarbon measurements at the CSIRO AMS facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 92(1–4):35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southon, J. 2007. Graphite reactor memory – Where is it from and how to minimize it? Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physical Research B 259(1):288–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, J, Prior, C. 2010. Report on the 20th International Radiocarbon Conference graphitization workshop. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):1230–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Němec, M, Bourquin, J. 2010. A revolutionary graphitisation system: fully automated, compact and simple. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):931–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Fülöp, RH, Hajdas, I, Molnár, M, Rethemeyer, J. 2013. A novel approach to process carbonate samples for radiocarbon measurements with helium carrier gas. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westgate, JA, Preece, SJ, Jackson, LE Jr. 2011. Revision of the tephrostratigraphy of the lower Sixtymile River area, Yukon Territory, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Science 48:695–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar