Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T10:08:35.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Reliability of AMS Radiocarbon Dating of Shells from China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Weijian Zhou
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 17, Xi'an 710054, China
M J Head
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 17, Xi'an 710054, China
Fubao Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Geo and Ocean Sciences, Nanjing University, 22 Hankou Road, Nanjing 210093, China
D J Donahue
Affiliation:
NSF AMS Facility, University of Arizona, PO Box 210081, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA
A J T Jull
Affiliation:
NSF AMS Facility, University of Arizona, PO Box 210081, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We tested the feasibility of dating freshwater and terrestrial molluscs from the semiarid and arid zone in China, since these types of shell material deposit only aragonite to form their shell structure, and shell integrity can be easily observed using X-ray diffraction. We also tested the possibility of estimating microenvironmental changes from shell δ13C values, but variations within shell populations preclude the use of these values as a reliable indicator. Reservoir ages were calculated for living shells of the same species as fossil shells by using their measured 14C ages, which were recalculated using an average value of atmospheric 14C activity for the years spanning their time of collection as the modern standard. The results indicate that freshwater and terrestrial shells are potentially useful as dating material, provided extreme care is taken in their collection and other datable material (in this case wood and pollen) is within the profile to act as a comparison.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Donahue, DJ, Jull, AJT, Toolin, LJ. 1990. Radiocarbon measurements at the University of Arizona AMS Facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B52:224–8.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, GA. 1987. Radiocarbon age anomalies in shell carbonate of land snails from semi-arid areas. Radiocarbon 29(2):159–68.Google Scholar
Head, MJ. 1991. The radiocarbon dating of fresh water and marine shells. In: Gillespie, R, editor. Proceedings of the Quaternary Dating Workshop 1990. Canberra: Australian National University. p 16–18.Google Scholar
Head, MJ, Zhou, W, Zhou, M. 1989. Evaluation of the 14C ages of organic fractions from loess–paleosol sequences near Xian, China. Radiocarbon 31(3):680–94.Google Scholar
Tungsheng, Liu et al. 1985. Loess and the environment. Beijing: China Ocean Press. p 73–83.Google Scholar
Slota, PJ Jr, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spennemann, DHR, Head, MJ. 1996. Reservoir modification of radiocarbon signatures in coastal and near-shore waters of Eastern Australia: the state of play. Quaternary Australasia 14(1):32–9.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.Google Scholar
Zhou, WJ, Donahue, DJ, Jull, AJT. 1997. 14C AMS dating of pollen from aeolian sand palaeosol and peat samples: implications for rapid climate change in the late Quaternary. Radiocarbon 39(1):19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, WJ, Zhou, MF, Head, MJ. 1990. 14C chronology of Bei Zhuang Cun sedimentation sequences since 30,000 years BP. Chinese Science Bulletin 35(7):567–72.Google Scholar