Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:35:07.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dating of Ceramic Materials: Progress and Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Suzanne P De Atley
Suzanne P De Atley*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Institute of Geophysics, University of California, Los Angeles
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although initial studies in the 1960's established the feasibility of applying the radiocarbon technique directly to ceramics, subsequent analyses have revealed this category of materials to be more complex than previously believed. Consideration of the points at which various types of organic carbon are introduced into ceramic materials by natural or human agencies allows more effective screening of potential sherd samples. It also suggest ways to overcome some of the limiting factors involved in dating ceramics.

Type
Dating Various Materials
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 22 , Issue 3: Heidelberg , 1980 , pp. 987 - 993
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science

Footnotes

*

Present address: Conservation Analytical Laboratory, HTB AB070, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 20009

References

Brew, J O, 1937, The first two seasons at Awatovi: Am Antiquity, v 3, p 122–137.Google Scholar
Engstrand, Lars G, 1965, Stockholm natural radiocarbon measurements VI: Radiocarbon, v 5, p 82–103.Google Scholar
Evans, Clifford and Meggers, Betty J, 1962, Use of organic temper for carbon-14 dating in lowland South America: Am Antiquity, v 28, p 243–245.Google Scholar
Eyre, S R, 1968, Vegetation and soils: Chicago, Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hack, John T, 1942, The changing physical environment of the Hopi Indians of Arizona: Peabody Mus Am Archaeol Ethnol, Papers, Harvard Univ, v 35, no. 1.Google Scholar
Hidikata, Hisakatsu, 1973, Some ceramics of Palau: Guam, Garrison and McCarter, Inc.Google Scholar
Hodge, F W, 1904, Hopi pottery fired with coal: Am Anthropologist, ns, v 6, p 581–582.Google Scholar
Lawrence, W G, 1972, Ceramic science for the potter: US, Chilton Book Co.Google Scholar
Martin, Paul and Plog, Fred, 1973, The archaeology of Arizona: A study of the southwest region: New York, Am Mus Nat History, Doubleday/Nat History Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, John C, 1965, Southwestern archaeology: Urbana, Univ Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, Douglas, 1966, The archaeology of the Palau Islands: Honolulu, Hawaii, Bernice P Bishop Mus Bull 230.Google Scholar
Osborne, Douglas in press, Archaeological test excavations, Palau Islands, 1968-1969: Micronesia Supp Pub, in press.Google Scholar
Ralph, Elizabeth K, 1959, University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates III: Radiocarbon Supp, Am Jour Sci, v 1, p 45–58.Google Scholar
Shepard, Anna O, 1965, Ceramics for the archaeologist: Carnegie Inst Washington, Pub 609, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Stuckenrath, R Jr., 1963, University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates VI: Radiocarbon, v 5, p 82–103.Google Scholar
Taylor, R E and Berger, Rainer, 1968, Radiocarbon dating of the organic portion of ceramic and wattle-and-daub house construction materials of low carbon content: Am Antiquity, v 33, p 363–366.Google Scholar
Taylor, R E, Swain, J L, and Berger, Rainer, 1968, New developments in the dating of ceramic artifacts: Internatl Am kong, 38th, Proc, Stuttgart-Munchen, 12-18 August 1968, v 1, p 55–60.Google Scholar