Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:14:03.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dating Historical Mortars: Lime Lumps and/or Binder Carbonate?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2018

Alf Lindroos ,
Åsa Ringbom ,
Jan Heinemeier ,
Greg Hodgins ,
Pia Sonck-Koota ,
Pia Sjöberg ,
Lynne Lancaster ,
Riikka Kaisti ,
Fiona Brock  and
Heikki Ranta
...Show all authors
Alf Lindroos*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Åsa Ringbom
Affiliation:
Art History, Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Jan Heinemeier
Affiliation:
AMS Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, Denmark
Greg Hodgins
Affiliation:
AMS Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Arizona, USA
Pia Sonck-Koota
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Pia Sjöberg
Affiliation:
Art History, Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Lynne Lancaster
Affiliation:
Department of Classics and World Regions, Ohio University, USA
Riikka Kaisti
Affiliation:
Turku and Kaarina Parish Union, Finland
Fiona Brock
Affiliation:
RLAHA, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom; and Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Shrivenham SN6 8LA, United Kingdom
Heikki Ranta
Affiliation:
Diocese of Lund, Church of Sweden, Lund, Sweden
Marta Caroselli
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
Stefano Lugli
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lime lumps and bulk mortars show different 14C contamination when analyzed in several CO2 fractions isolated from the effervescence of an ongoing hydrolysis reaction. Age profiles of both materials are therefore highly complementary and together they can provide a reliable date. Furthermore, they can also reveal the complexity of the radiocarbon (14C) distribution within the mortar and thus prevent over-interpretation of the data. The lime lump versus bulk mortar dating data presented here has been collected over 22 years, with only a small fraction of the results so far published internationally. Since there has been an increasing interest in mortar dating over recent years with a special focus on lime lumps, and since many laboratories have just begun mortar dating experiments, we wish to present some of the extensive data that already exist. Previously published data from 15 lime lumps (including 34 14C measurements from sequential dissolution) and 43 new 14C measurements from 17 lime lumps are presented here. The samples are from medieval Finland and Sweden, classical Rome and medieval Italy, and the Roman Jerash (Gerasa), Jordan.

Keywords

14C profilescalcitehydrolysissequential dissolution
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , June 2018 , pp. 875 - 899
Copyright
© 2018 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bjuggner, L, Rosengren, E. 2015. Ås Kloster i nytt ljus –År 3. Arkeologiska Rap-porter från Hallands Länsmuseer 2015:5, Kulturmiljö Halland.Google Scholar
Boström, R. 1986. The history of the stone and mineral industry in Finland. In: Tanskanen H, editor. Geological Survey of Finland, Bulletin 336. p 273–298.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2017. OxCal [WWW program] version 4.3. Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit: University of Oxford. Available at https//c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/oxcal/OxCalhtml.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1982. Terracina. In: Lazio, editor. Guide archeologiche Laterza. 5. Rome: Bari.Google Scholar
Diplomatarium Fennicum. Database. Available at http://extranet.narc.fi/DF/.Google Scholar
Frutaz, AP. 2001. Il Complesso Monumentale Di Sant’Agnese. Rome: Sesta Edizioni.Google Scholar
Gardberg, CJ, Heininen, S, Welin, PO. 2000. Nationalhelgedomen Åbo Domkyrka 1300–2000 (in Swedish with an English summary). Helsingfors.Google Scholar
Hajdas, I, Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, Å, Marzaioli, F, Terrasi, F, Passariello, I, et al. 2017. Preparation and dating of mortar samples—Mortar Dating Inter-Comparison Study (MODIS). Radiocarbon 59(6):1845–1858, doi: 10.1017/RDC.2017.112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayen, R, Van Strydonck, M, Fontaine, L, Boudin, M, Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, Å, et al. 2016a. Mortar dating methodology: assessing recurrent issues and needs for further research. Radiocarbon 59(6):1859–1871, doi: 10.1017/RDC.2017.129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayen, R, Van Strydonck, M, Boaretto, E, Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, Å, Hueglin, S, Michalska, D, Hajdas, I, Marzaioli, F, Maspero, F, Galli, A, Artioli, G, Moreau, C, Guibert, P, Caroselli, M. 2016b. Analysis and characterization of historic mortars for absolute dating. Proceedings of the 4th Historic Mortars Conference (HMC2016). October 10–12, 2016, Santorini, Greece. p 656–64.Google Scholar
Heinemeier, J, Jungner, H, Lindroos, A, Ringbom, Å, von Konow, T, Rud, N. 1997. AMS 14C dating of lime mortar. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 123:487–495.Google Scholar
Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, Å, Lindroos, A, Sveinbjörnsdóttir, ÁE. 2010. Successful AMS 14C dating of non-hydraulic lime mortars from the medieval churches of the Åland Islands, Finland. Radiocarbon 52(1):171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiekkanen, M. 2007. Suomen keskiajan kivikirkot. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia, 1117. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Hodgins, GWL, Lindroos, A, Ringbom, Å, Heinemeier, J, Brock, F. 2011. 14C dating of Roman mortars—preliminary tests using diluted hydrochloric acid injected in batches. Proceedings from Building Roma Aeterna, conference, Rome, March 23–25, 2008. In: Ringbom Å, Hohlfelder R, editors. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 128, Societas Scientiarium Fennica. p 209–13.Google Scholar
Lichtenberger, A, Lindroos, A, Raja, R, Heinemeier, J. 2015. Radiocarbon analysis of mortar from Roman and Byzantine water management installations in the northwest Quarter of Jerash, Jordan. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2. p 114–127.Google Scholar
Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, Å, Braskén, M, Sveinbjörnsdóttir, ÁE. 2007. Mortar dating using AMS 14C and sequential dissolution: examples from medieval, non-hydraulic lime mortars from the Åland Islands, SW Finland. Radiocarbon 49(1):47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, Å, Brock, F, Sonck-Koota, P, Pehkonen, M, Suksi, J. 2011a. Problems in radiocarbon dating of Roman pozzolana mortars. Proceedings from Building Roma Aeterna, conference, Rome, March 23–25, 2008. In: Ringbom Å, Hohlfelder R, editors. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 128, Societas Scientiarium Fennica. p 214–230.Google Scholar
Lindroos, A, Ringbom, Å, Kaisti, R, Heinemeier, J, Hodgins, G, Brock, F. 2011b. The oldest parts of Turku Cathedral. 14C chronology of fire damaged mortars. In: Hansson J, Ranta H, editors. Proceedings: Archaeology and History of Churches in Baltic Region Symposium. June 8–12, 2010, Visby, Sweden. Visby. p 108–21.Google Scholar
Lindroos, A, Regev, L, Oinonen, M, Ringbom, Å, Heinemeier, J. 2012. 14C dating of fire damaged mortars from medieval Finland. Radiocarbon 54(3–4):915–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindroos, A, Ranta, H, Heinemeier, J, Lill, JO. 2014. 14C chronology of the oldest Scandinavian church in use: an AMS/PIXE study of lime lump carbonate in the mortar. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 331:220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, G. 1997. A new look at the patronage of Santa Costanza, Rome. Byzantion 67:383–406.Google Scholar
Pesce, G, Quarta, G, Calcagnile, L, Délia, M, Cavaciocci, P, Lastrico, C, Guastella, R. 2009. Radiocarbon dating of lumps from aerial lime mortars and plasters. Radiocarbon 51(2):867–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesce, G, Ball, R, Quarta, G, Calcagnile, L. 2012. Identification, extraction, and preparation of reliable lime samples for 14C dating of plasters and mortars with the “pure lime lumps technique”. Radiocarbon 54(3–4):933–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, C, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatte, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringbom, Å. 2003. Dolphins and mortar dating: Santa Costanza reconsidered. In: Songs of Ossian, Festschrift in Honour of Professor Bo Ossian Lindberg. Taidehistoriallisia Tukimuksia 27 Konsthistoriska Studier 27. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Ringbom, Å. 2011. The Voice of the Åland Churches: New Light on Medieval Art, Architecture and History. Åland’s Museum.Google Scholar
Ringbom, Å, Remmer, C. 1995. Ålands Kyrkor, Vol. 1, Hammarland och Eckerö (in Swedish with English summary). Mariehamn: Ålands landskapsstyrelse/Museibyrån.Google Scholar
Ringbom, Å, Bartholin, T, Klein, P, Lindroos, A, Sveinbjörnsdóttir, ÀE, Heinemeier, J. 2005. Naturvetenskaplig datering. In: Ringbom A, Remmer C, editors. Ålands kyrkor Vol. 3. Sund och Vårdö. p 100–110.Google Scholar
Ringbom, Å, Hale, J, Heinemeier, J, Lindroos, A, Brock, F. 2006. Mortar dating in archaeological studies of Classical and Medieval structures. Proceedings, Second International Congress on Construction History 3:2613–2634.Google Scholar
Ringbom, Å, Heinemeier, J, Lindroos, A, Brock, F. 2011. Mortar dating and Roman Pozzolana, results and interpretation. In: Ringbom Å, Hohlfelder R, editors. Proceedings from Building Roma Aeterna, conference in Rome, March 23–25 2008. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum, Societas Scientiarium Fennica 128. p 187–208.Google Scholar
Ringbom, Å, Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Sonck-Koota, P. 2014. 19 years of mortar dating—learning from experience. Radiocarbon 56(2):619–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touring Club Italiano. 1999. Guida d’Italia: Roma, 9th edition. Milan: Touring Club Italiano.Google Scholar
Sjöberg, P, Lindroos, A, Ringbom, Å. 2011. Radiocarbon Dating of the Medieval Churches of the Åboland Archipelago, Archaeology and History of Churches in the Baltic Region. Symposium, June 8–12, 2010. Visby, Sweden. p 171–93.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, van der Borg, K, de Jong, A, Keppens, E. 1992. Radiocarbon dating of lime fractions and organic material from buildings. Radiocarbon 34(3):873–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tubbs, LE, Kinder, TN. 1990. The use of AMS for the dating of lime mortars. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 52:438–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar