Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:06:46.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RADIOCARBON CHRONOLOGY OF THE OCCUPATION OF THE SOUTHERN COAST OF NAYARIT, MEXICO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2024

Corina Solís*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 CDMX, México
Zulema Berenice Flores Montes de Oca
Affiliation:
Dirección de Salvamento Arqueológico, INAH, Córdoba 45, Col. Roma, 06700, CDMX, México
Eric Nehmad Amador García
Affiliation:
Dirección de Salvamento Arqueológico, INAH, Córdoba 45, Col. Roma, 06700, CDMX, México
Citlalli Minerva Contreras Vargas
Affiliation:
Dirección de Salvamento Arqueológico, INAH, Córdoba 45, Col. Roma, 06700, CDMX, México
María Rodríguez-Ceja
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 CDMX, México
Maikel Diaz
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Tecnologías y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de La Habana, Ave. Salvador Allende 1110, Plaza de la Revolución, Habana, Cuba
Miguel Ángel Martínez-Carrillo
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior S/N, 04510 CDMX, México
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite chronicles from the 16th century describing fertile alluvial plains and densely populated wetlands, archaeology in western Mexico has been little studied. The Directorate of Archaeological Salvage (DSA) of National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH) has initiated a study of two sites in Costa Canuva, at the southern part of Nayarit state: Becerros and Naranjos. Thirty charcoal and shell samples were radiocarbon (14C) dated to determine occupation history. A Bayesian approach was used to build a chronological modeling from charcoal samples. Charcoal and shell samples found in the same context allowed us to calculate the ΔR values of marine offset for this period. In general, the archaeological sites of this area are divided into three major periods: Formative, Classic, and Postclassic. The 14C dating of Becerros recovered materials provided a chronological framework for the site’s occupation, from cal AD 169–1025, corroborating the ceramic studies in the sense that human settlement activities date from the Formative (300 BC–AD 600) to the Early Postclassic (AD 900–1200). Naranjos started in the Classic period and reached its occupancy peak in the Late Classic. The site’s occupation may have persisted for at least two centuries after the conquest of the Altiplano in 1521. The comparison of charcoal dates and associated shell samples from the Naranjos Unit gave a probability distribution for ΔR, that ranged from 118.5 to 199.5 with a mean value of 159 ± 4, slightly higher than other values obtained at nearby sites.

Type
Conference Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Arizona

INTRODUCTION

The area of Western Mexico is occupied by the states of Jalisco, Colima, and Nayarit. Nayarit´s chronology as that for Mesoamerica, is divided into three major periods: Formative (Early Formative 2000–300 BC and Late Formative 300 BC–AD 300); Classic: (Early Classic AD 300–500 and Late Classic AD 500–850/900), and Postclassic (Early Postclassic AD 850/900–1200, and Late Postclassic AD 1200–1521). In Nayarit, important changes mark the temporalities: shaft tombs characterize the Late Formative; in the Classic, a change in ceramics is observed, with a wider variety of decorative techniques; finally, during the Postclassic period, metallurgy begins.

At the arrival of the Spaniards, the region was densely populated. Despite the scarcity of archaeological research in this area, it is known that the coastal populations had a complex social and political organization and a highly diversified mixed economy based on the exploitation of tropical coastal wetlands, brackish water lagoons, and estuaries of high biodiversity, as well as a wide availability of crustaceans and mollusks (Gámez Eternod, Reference Gámez Eternod2004; Garduño Reference Garduño2021).

Due to touristic and economic development, there has been an increasing demand from construction companies on the Mexican coasts in the last few decades. Tourist interest in lands with beautiful beaches and landscapes should pass through archaeological inspection and research before getting the authorization to build hotels or resorts. Such is the case of Canuva Coast, located on the Pacific coast, in southern Nayarit (Figure 1). The area, approximately 300 hectares, contains archaeological sites that had never been explored. This research started in 2020 as an archaeological salvage project performed by the Archaeological Rescue Directorate (DSA-Dirección de Salvamento Arqueológico) of the National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH-Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia). The pursuit of this Directorate is oriented to preserve the cultural heritage before a new construction project takes place.

Figure 1 Location of Costa Canuva, in the municipality of Compostela, Nayarit, Mexico. (Artwork by Eric N. Amador).

This cooperation between the DSA and construction companies has facilitated research in remote areas of Mexico that have been explored very little or not at all. Another goal of this project is to avoid the loss of crucial objects and learn about the pre-Hispanic past of the southern coast of Nayarit (Flores-Montes de Oca and Amador-Garcia Reference Flores-Montes and Amador-García2021). Several structures were found along numerous ceramic objects with associated charcoal, wood and bones during the excavation. The South Coast of Nayarit, where the sites studied are located, has been studied previously by several archaeologists (Bordaz Reference Bordaz1964; Mountjoy Reference Mountjoy1970; Beltrán Reference Beltrán1998, Reference Beltrán2005; Garduño Reference Garduño2013, Reference Garduño2014), who have proposed a ceramic typology, with its corresponding chronology.

The objective of this study was to apply, for the first time, radiocarbon (14C) dating of these archaeological materials to establish the chronology of occupation of the cultures that settled in the Canuva Coast. The ages obtained by 14C dating with those previously estimated by the site’s ceramics were also compared as well as, anthropomorphic figurines, and rock ornaments. We can assess the consistency and accuracy of both methods by comparing the obtained 14C ages from organic materials with the typo-chronological dating derived from ceramics and other archaeological materials. The comparison can help to establish correlations between the absolute ages obtained through 14C dating and the relative typological sequences. This correlation is valuable for archaeological dating objects without organic material suitable for 14C dating.

In the domestic contexts of the Naranjos archaeological site, various common use objects were found, including seashells from bivalves used as a food resource. The presence of these items in this site is attributed to human intervention and showed no signs of having been used to make ornaments or tools. Having marine shells and contemporary terrestrial organic samples offered the opportunity to study the 14C marine reservoir effect (R) (Stuiver et al. Reference Stuiver, Pearson and Braziunas1986). Therefore, an additional goal of this study was to estimate the local marine reservoir variation (ΔR) in this region. The use of contemporary marine and terrestrial samples is a common approach to estimate ΔR (Cooper and Thomas Reference Cooper and Thomas2012; Dettman et al. Reference Dettman, Mitchell, Huckleberry and Foster2015; Zazzo et al. Reference Zazzo, Munoz, Badel, Béguier, Genchi and Marcucci2016; Alves et al. Reference Alves, Macario, Ascough and Bronk Ramsey2018).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Sites

Canuva Coast, an under construction touristic complex, belongs to Compostela, a municipality located in the southern of Nayarit state located on the Pacific coast (Figure 1). As part of an archaeological rescue project, two locations in Canuva Coast were excavated: Becerros and Naranjos. Becerros is a well-preserved site, with no apparent recent human disturbance, located on a flat area between the mountains and the beach, favorable for human settlement. Its architecture made of rock slabs indicates a residential use, associated with large pots assemblage with fragments of grinding stones and rocks of various sizes. At the Becerros site, extensive periods of human occupation have been observed. In the southeastern region, there is a notable concentration of material from the Late Formative period, characterized by a circular offering (EU2 in Figure 1). In contrast, towards the northern area, 500 m away, there is evidence of a habitation zone with artifacts from the Classic Period, referred to as EU1 in Figure 1. Despite the temporality difference for the EU1 and EU2, both sites were established in Becerros geographic area.

Naranjos, located 1.5 km away from Becerros is a jungle environment characterized by deciduous vegetation, near an estuary that meanders through the area and eventually reaches the beach, sharing the same name. An abode consisting of two rooms, constructed using an arrangement of rocks, was discovered (EU3 in Figure 1). Within this dwelling, a funerary space was identified alongside various objects associated with daily activities. These items included grinding stones, fishing tools, and anthropomorphic figurines.

Ceramic Typology and Stratigraphy

Material collected in Canuva Coast comes from excavation units 1 (EU1) and 2 (EU2) in Becerros and excavation unit 3 (EU3) in Naranjos. The oldest pottery typology was in EU2 at Becerros. It included different styles: chinesco black-on-cream, chinesco black-on-orange, and chinesco polychrome, associated with the Terminal Formative and Early Classic periods (300 BC–AD 500) (Beltrán Reference Beltrán1998, Reference Beltrán2005; Beltrán and González Reference Beltrán and González2012; Garduño Reference Garduño2021). Other ceramic types were navy-red-sgraffito, red-on graffito buff, and polished-monochrome-buff. These are classified as local since they have not been reported from other archaeological sites. In EU1, ceramics with red borders with buff-colored stripes, black and white-on-red, amapa red-on-buff color, and amapa red-on-orange types were found, belonging to the Classic period (AD 300–850/900) (Beltrán Reference Beltrán2005; Garduño Reference Garduño2013, Reference Garduño2014; Cid et al. Reference Cid, Cruz and Gámez2014). Less frequent was the ceramic belonging to the Early Postclassic (AD 850/900–1200) whose styles were: brown-on-fine cream, smoothed orange monochrome, and fine cream monochrome. In EU3 at Naranjos, the ceramic types identified were the same as in EU1 at Becerros, plus others in the black and red-on-orange (Cid et al. Reference Cid, Cruz and Gámez2014), and brushed brown styles, all of them belonging to the Classic period (Beltrán Reference Beltrán2005). Ceramics of the otates polychrome type (Beltrán Reference Beltrán2005; Beltrán-González Reference Beltrán and González2012), late punzonada (Beltrán Reference Beltrán1998), Banderas black-on-orange (Beltrán Reference Beltrán1998, Reference Beltrán2005), belonging to the Late Postclassic period (AD 1200–1521), were also found at this site.

The excavation at both sites was performed at intervals of 20 cm in depth, identifying and analyzing each natural stratigraphic layer. All recovered material were classified and grouped according to its location in the stratigraphic sequence during the analysis process (layer I, layer II, etc.), identifying the different cultural periods in each layer. Artifacts of different chronologies were not mixed throughout the stratigraphy, but some layers were so thick that contained material belonging to two cultural periods. Some charcoal samples were found in the interior of closed vessels, and others were found close to them. The charcoal provides an accurate proxy date for the deposition of the pottery.

14C Dating Samples

At the Becerros site, seven charcoal samples associated with ceramic sherds and other elements were collected for radiocarbon dating. Charcoal samples were carefully collected from the soil and from within the ceramic vessels containing funerary materials, specifically incinerated bones found inside the pots. Samples were collected at different depths, as close as possible to the ceramic sherds, representing the time at which the objects were deposited. The occupations at the site were primarily determined through the analysis of ceramic connections. Certain types of ceramics aided in understanding the chronological sequence of deposition. Subsequently, these findings were further validated using 14C dating techniques.

From Naranjos burial sites in EU3, 12 charcoal samples were collected. Additionally, 15 whole bivalve mollusk shells (mainly from Ostrea and Crassostrea genera), were recovered. All samples collected from Naranjos, including charcoal and malacological material, originate from the same stratigraphic layer (II). Ten samples were obtained from a depth ranging between 20 to 60 cm, while two others were obtained at a depth of 80–100 cm. Given that Naranjos is located 500 m from the sea, it can be inferred that the malacological material’s deposition resulted from human activity rather than natural processes.

14C Dating

The 14C concentrations were obtained by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) at LEMA, Instituto de Física, UNAM, Mexico. Chemical procedures followed for charcoal, and shell samples were previously reported (Hajdas Reference Hajdas2008). Molars lacked enough collagen and were discarded. Samples were combusted at 950 degrees with oxygen injection in an elemental analyzer (Vario Microcube). The resultant CO2 was then converted to graphite in an automatized equipment AGE III (Ion Plus). Shells (35–40 mg) were cleaned and treated with 3.4 mL hydrochloric acid (0.1 M) overnight to remove half of the outer layer (Díaz et al. Reference Diaz, Macario, Gomes, Álvarez-Lajonchere, Aguilera and Alves2017). They were then submitted to a digestion reaction with H3PO4 at 75°C to obtain CO2 in a CHS Carbonate Handling System (Ion Plus). The obtained CO2 was transferred with helium to a reactor and reduced to graphite on iron powder via hydrogen reduction. The 14C concentration in pure graphite was measured with a 1MV AMS system (HVEE) and 14C ages based on the 14C/12C and 13C/12C ratios were calculated following LEMA protocols (Solís et al. Reference Solís, Chávez-Lomelí, Ortiz, Huerta and Andrade2014). OxCal v 4.4.4 program (Bronk Ramsey Reference Bronk Ramsey2009; Ramsey and Lee Reference Bronk Ramsey and Lee2013) with IntCal20 curve (Reimer et al. Reference Reimer, Austin, Bard, Bayliss, Blackwell, Ramsey, Butzin, Cheng, Edwards, Friedrich, Grootes, Guilderson, Hajdas, Heaton, Hogg, Hughen, Kromer, Manning, Muscheler, Palmer, Pearson, Van der Plicht, Reimer, Richards, Scott, Southon, Turney, Wacker, Adolphi, Büntgen, Capano, Fahrni, Fogtmann-Schulz, Friedrich, Köhler, Kudsk, Miyake, Olsen, Reinig, Sakamoto, Sookdeo and Tálamo2020) was used to obtain calibrated ages (BC/AD) with confidence limits of 95%. A chronological modeling was undertaken using the program OxCal 4.4.4. by grouping the charcoal samples in phases.

To estimate ΔR we used a similar approach as in Carvalho et al. (Reference Carvalho, Macario, De Oliveira, Oliveira, Chanca, Alves, Souza, Aguilera and Douka2015) and Diaz et al. (Reference Diaz, Macario, Gomes, Álvarez-Lajonchere, Aguilera and Alves2017). With the OxCal software, each charcoal sample was grouped with theirs closer archaeological paired shells under the same phase. Inside the phase, the charcoal is calibrated using IntCal20 while the shells are calibrated using the marine curve Marine20, leaving the ΔR undefined in the interval of −250 to 250 14C yr. Each group/phase is placed in independent sequences but considering ΔR the same for all phases. The complete code is presented in Table 1 in the supplementary material.

RESULTS

Results for 14C ages obtained from charcoal samples from the excavation units EU1 and EU2 at Becerros and unit EU3 at Naranjos are presented in Table 1. Calibrated dates were obtained with OxCal v 4.4.4. We subjected the two sets of dates to a Bayesian chronological modeling process. Figure 2 shows the condensed the Bayesian models of the two sites. Each phase in the figure corresponds to one layer of Table 1. The code of the model is shown in the supplementary material section. The outputs of the model indicate a good overall agreement (Figure 2).

Table 1 Radiocarbon data for charcoal samples from Becerros and Naranjos. The associated occupation period refers to that inferred from the pottery. The layer of each Excavation Unit (EU) is in parenthesis. Average carbon content was 60%. AMS-δ13C varied from –23 to –28‰.

Figure 2 Bayesian Sequence Model of the Becerros and Naranjos in Costa Canuva. Horizontal bars under the distributions are at 1σ and 2σ probability ranges. The agreement values of the model are shown. Distributions followed by a “?” were excluded from the analysis. Having access to modern shells and charcoal samples from Naranjos provided us with the chance to assess the marine reservoir effect in that location. Therefore, we determined the local reservoir offset ΔR by comparing the ages of contemporary charcoal and their associated marine shells collected from the same stratigraphic layer from Naranjos.

For Becerros, the 14C dates ranged from 1807 ± 25 to 1073 ± 30 BP, which fell into the 169–1025 cal AD (modeled 603–1021 cal AD) interval. The only charcoal sample from EU2 (LEMA 1697) from layer V, discovered beneath a large polychromatic vessel, showed a date of 1807 BP (168–335 cal AD), and corresponds to the oldest value, in the Formative period. Since it is a single sample from this unit, it was excluded from the Bayesian model in Figure 2. This area within EU2, with very little datable material, is the sole location where Terminal Formative material was found.

Charcoal samples from excavation unit EU1 were collected as follows: LEMA 1701, from inside a funerary urn closed with a lid with charred human remains in the northern part (layer VII); LEMA 1712 and 1704, from layer III in the northern part, above two large pots; LEMA 1698, also from layer III, near green obsidian objects and a human figurine. LEMA 1700 from layer III, was in the southwestern part of EU1, and LEMA 1702 from layer II in the northwestern part of EU1, atop a large pot, yielded the youngest ages among the samples.

This sample was found close to a globular rattle made of copper; a material considered from the Early Postclassic period.

Of the samples collected in EU 3 at Naranjos, all correspond to layer II. Of these, samples LEMA 1703 and LEMA 1692 were modeled separately because although they are in layer II, they were found in the lowest level at 0.8–1 m depth, while the rest of the samples of the layer were found in a level above 0.2–0.6 m depth. This means that in the layer II of Naranjos, there were at least two occupational stages. The chronology of Naranjos occupation was obtained from the charcoal samples, found in layer II of the EU3. The dates obtained are also listed in Table 1 and the Bayesian model is shown in Figure 2. The oldest two samples found, LEMA 1703 and LEMA 1692, had 14C dates of 1240 ± 30 and 1232 ± 30 BP (681 to 882 cal AD, modeled 675–889 cal AD). They were modeled separately because they were found in the lowest level of layer II, at 0.8–1m depth, corresponding to the Late Classic period for the South and North coasts of Nayarit, which varies from 500–850/900 AD. Five charcoal samples, found in a level above 0.2–0.6 m depth, had later dates, from 417 ± 27 to 356 ± 35 BP (1432 to 1636 cal AD, modeled 1441–1625 cal AD) (LEMA 1766, LEMA 1760, LEMA1768, LEMA1748 and LEMA1757) corresponding to the Late Postclassic period. Five charcoal samples fell in long intervals up to modern ages: 53 ± 27 to 235 ± 26 BP (1529 to 1945 cal AD) (LEMA 1744, LEMA 1754, LEMA 1770, LEMA1764 and LEMA 1762). These dates were identified as outliers and were excluded from the Bayesian model in Figure 2. They are shown in the figure because although they could provide insight into the timing of that occupation, they could not be associated with a single phase. As Naranjos sits on sandy soil, easily subject to disturbance by water or bioturbation, we interpret that these charcoals are intrusive that moved to deeper levels. The absence of modern artifacts such as plastic bags, bricks, nails, as well as ceramics with Spanish influence (glazed), is the main argument supporting this hypothesis.

The 15 marine shells from Naranjos displayed 14C ages with a more delimited time frame: from 1144 ± 28 to 962 ± 26 BP, centered in an average of 1007 ± 72 BP, while the charcoal samples were distributed between very early and very late dates. With the aim of estimate the reservoir effect at the time of occupation, we selected only those charcoals corresponding to Postclassic period (LEMA 1748, LEMA 1757, LEMA 1760, LEMA 1766, and LEMA 1768). Figure 3 shows the distribution of charcoal and shells in excavation unit EU3 of Naranjos.

Figure 3 Calibration data for charcoal and associated shell samples from Naranjos.

Table 2 shows 14C dates of bivalve shells and their associated charcoal samples. The pairs were selected considering position and closeness of samples in the stratigraphic layer (Figure 3). Since most of the bivalves correspond to shallow layers and because of their sizes are difficult to move down, they would mark the end of the site’s occupation.

Table 2 Shells samples, species and 14C dating results from Naranjos site used to estimate ΔR, with their corresponding paired charcoal samples.

With this set of samples, we determine the ΔR using the Bayesian methods described above (Reimer & Reimer Reference Reimer and Reimer2001), with groups formed as it is shown in Figure 3 and Table 2. The resulted probability distribution is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4 ΔR = 53±76 obtained for shells from Naranjos site.

The value of 159 ± 41 for ΔR is slightly higher than other values obtained from sites close to the southern coast of Nayarit. Berger et al. (Reference Berger, Taylor and Libby1966) reported values of 3 ± 50 for Banderas Bay Jalisco, 85 ± 50 for Isabel Island, and 59 ± 48 for Nayarit and Mazatlán Sinaloa, located at 26, 129, and 226 km respectively. However, these values were calculated using pre-bomb known-age shells for a different time, so it is hard to make a comparison. These are the Berger et al. values corrected for the Marine20 chronology. Anyway, this new positive value helps to confirm the influence of upwelling in the Mexican West coast as pointed out by Berger et al. (Reference Berger, Taylor and Libby1966).

CONCLUSION

This study has allowed us to set a more solid chronology framework of one of the archaeological zones in western Mexico. The 14C dating of charcoal LEMA 1697 recovered at Becerros provided an absolute date for the site’s earliest occupation at cal AD 169–335, corresponding to the Late Formative period. The date of this material could be due to the old wood effect. However, we dismiss this possibility because we found ceramic material in the same excavation unit with chinesco-style typology, which is characteristic of that period. The charcoal dated simply ratifies the occupation previously indicated by the ceramic typology. The archaeological evidence provided by the ceramic materials and a copper rattle found in Becerros, indicates that the human settlement in this site reached its peak during the Classic period, and continued until the Early Postclassic period. This assumption is confirmed by the results of 14C dating associated with these materials, whose dates fall within the Early Postclassic period.

In Naranjos, the occupation period is posterior to Becerros. Although all the samples from Naranjos correspond to the same stratigraphic layer, their radiocarbon dates reveal an apparently extensive occupation that begins in the Late Classic period (500 AD–850/900) and extends beyond the Postclassic period (850/900 to 1521). While most of charcoal samples are consistent with the ceramic temporality (Classic and Postclassic), dates from five charcoal samples fall into broad calibrated date ranges beginning in the 1600s and reaching modernity. The absence of materials such as bricks, nails, or ceramics with Spanish influence (glazed), indicators commonly found in colonial occupations, are the main argument supporting a possible intrusion. Especially considering that these are porous sandy soils easily subject to disturbance by water or bioturbation. However, the possibility exists that activities in the area continued long after the end of the Late Postclassic. Although historically the period ends in 1521 with the Spanish conquest, cultural changes did not occur simultaneously throughout the territory. Some regions of Mexico remained relatively isolated and self-sufficient until the mid-19th century. Due to their low population density and difficult terrain conditions, these regions were of no interest to the Spanish colonizers, which allowed many indigenous communities to maintain a certain degree of independence and continuity in their customs for a long time.

The finding of shells associated with organic material was used to determine the local ΔR of Canuva Coast for that period giving a value of 159 ± 41 years.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2024.94

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Canuva Coast project was possible thanks to the sponsorship of the Directorate of Archaeological Salvage (DSA) of INAH. We thank Salvador Pulido and Olga Landa, director, and assistant director respectively, of the DSA. We thank Arcadio Huerta and Sergio Martínez for technical assistance. This project received partial support from DGAPA-PAPIIT Grant IN112023 and CONAHCyT LNC58.

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 24th Radiocarbon and 10th Radiocarbon & Archaeology International Conferences, Zurich, Switzerland, 11–16 Sept. 2022

References

REFERENCES

Alves, EQ, Macario, K, Ascough, P, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2018. The worldwide marine radiocarbon reservoir effect: definitions, mechanisms, and prospects. Reviews of Geophysics 56(1):278305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beltrán, JC. 1998. Informe Análisis Cerámico de las Excavaciones de Punta de Mita. Nayarit. México, Centro INAH Nayarit.Google Scholar
Beltrán, JC. 2005. Informe del Rescate Arqueológico del Sitio Tizate-Cruz de Huanacaxtle, Materiales Arqueológicos. México, Centro INAH Nayarit.Google Scholar
Beltrán, JC, González, L. 2012. Informe Final- Material Cerámico. Salvamento Arqueológico Litibú. México, Centro INAH Nayarit.Google Scholar
Berger, R, Taylor, RE, Libby, WF. 1966. Radiocarbon content of marine shells from the California and Mexican west coast. Science 153(3738):864866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordaz, J. 1964. Pre-Columbian ceramic kilns at Peñitas, a Post-Classic site in coastal Nayarit, Mexico. Columbia University. Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Lee, S. 2013. Recent and planned developments of the program OxCal. Radiocarbon 55(2):720730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, C, Macario, K, De Oliveira, MI, Oliveira, F, Chanca, I, Alves, E, Souza, R, Aguilera, O, Douka, K. 2015. Potential use of archaeological snail shells for the calculation of local marine reservoir effect. Radiocarbon 57(3):459467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cid, JR, Cruz, C, Gámez, L. 2014. Informe técnico final del Proyecto Salvamento Arqueológico Domo San Pedro, San Pedro Lagunillas, Nayarit. México, Centro INAH Nayarit.Google Scholar
Cooper, J, Thomas, KD. 2012. Constructing Caribbean chronologies: comparative radiocarbon dating of shell and wood artefacts from Pre-Columbian sites in Cuba. Archaeometry 54(2):401425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dettman, DL, Mitchell, DR, Huckleberry, G, Foster, MS 2015. 14C and marine reservoir effect in archaeological samples from the Northeast Gulf of California. Radiocarbon 57(5):785793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, M, Macario, K, Gomes, PRS, Álvarez-Lajonchere, L, Aguilera, O, Alves, EQ. 2017. Radiocarbon marine reservoir effect on the northwestern coast of Cuba. Radiocarbon 59(2):333341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores-Montes, ZB, Amador-García, EN. 2021. Arqueología en la Riviera Nayarita. Investigaciones de Salvamento arqueológico en playa El Naranjo. Redes de Occidente 2:1725.Google Scholar
Gámez Eternod, L. 2004. Sucesión cultural prehispánica en la llanura deltaica del río Acaponeta (Nayarit) [master’s dissertation in Archaeology]. Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia. México.Google Scholar
Garduño, M. 2013. Análisis de materiales de excavación del proyecto arqueológico Coamiles (2007–2008). México, Centro INAH Nayarit.Google Scholar
Garduño, M. 2014. Análisis de materiales de excavación del proyecto arqueológico Coamiles (2005–2010). Tomo I: Reporte técnico de análisis cerámico/Temporadas 2007–2008. México, Centro INAH Nayarit.Google Scholar
Garduño, M. 2021. Cerro de Coamiles, Nayarit: Nuevos datos sobre la arquitectura ceremonial de la zona nuclear costera Aztatlan. Redes de Occidente 1-1-8.Google Scholar
Hajdas, I. 2008. Radiocarbon dating and its applications in Quaternary studies. E&G Quaternary Science Journal 57(1/2):224.Google Scholar
Kelly, IT, Fowler, CS, Kemper, RV, Tirado, LAG. 2008. Excavaciones en Chametla, Sinaloa. Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Mountjoy, JB Jr 1970. Prehispanic culture history and cultural contact on the southern coast of Nayarit, Mexico. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Austin, WEN, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Blackwell, PG, Ramsey, CB, Butzin, M, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Muscheler, R, Palmer, JG, Pearson, C, Van der Plicht, J, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Turney, CSM, Wacker, L, Adolphi, F, Büntgen, U, Capano, M, Fahrni, SM, Fogtmann-Schulz, A, Friedrich, R, Köhler, P, Kudsk, P, Miyake, F, Olsen, J, Reinig, F, Sakamoto, M, Sookdeo, A, Tálamo, S. 2020. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Reimer, RW. 2001. A marine reservoir correction database and on-line interface. Radiocarbon 43(2A):461463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solís, C, Chávez-Lomelí, E, Ortiz, ME, Huerta, A, Andrade, Barrios E. 2014. A new AMS facility in Mexico. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 331:233237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Pearson, GW, Braziunas, T. 1986. Radiocarbon age calibration of marine samples back to 9000 cal yr BP. Radiocarbon 28(2B):9801021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zazzo, A, Munoz, O, Badel, E, Béguier, I, Genchi, F, Marcucci, LG. 2016. A revised radiocarbon chronology of the aceramic shell midden of Ra’s Al-Hamra 6 (Muscat, Sultanate of Oman): implication for occupational sequence, marine reservoir age, and human mobility. Radiocarbon 58(2):383395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Location of Costa Canuva, in the municipality of Compostela, Nayarit, Mexico. (Artwork by Eric N. Amador).

Figure 1

Table 1 Radiocarbon data for charcoal samples from Becerros and Naranjos. The associated occupation period refers to that inferred from the pottery. The layer of each Excavation Unit (EU) is in parenthesis. Average carbon content was 60%. AMS-δ13C varied from –23 to –28‰.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Bayesian Sequence Model of the Becerros and Naranjos in Costa Canuva. Horizontal bars under the distributions are at 1σ and 2σ probability ranges. The agreement values of the model are shown. Distributions followed by a “?” were excluded from the analysis. Having access to modern shells and charcoal samples from Naranjos provided us with the chance to assess the marine reservoir effect in that location. Therefore, we determined the local reservoir offset ΔR by comparing the ages of contemporary charcoal and their associated marine shells collected from the same stratigraphic layer from Naranjos.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Calibration data for charcoal and associated shell samples from Naranjos.

Figure 4

Table 2 Shells samples, species and 14C dating results from Naranjos site used to estimate ΔR, with their corresponding paired charcoal samples.

Figure 5

Figure 4 ΔR = 53±76 obtained for shells from Naranjos site.

Supplementary material: File

Solís et al. supplementary material

Solís et al. supplementary material
Download Solís et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.4 KB