Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:36:54.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantifying Charcoal Degradation and Negative Priming of Soil Organic Matter with a 14C-Dead Tracer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Emma L Tilston ,
Philippa L Ascough ,
Mark H Garnett  and
Michael I Bird
Emma L Tilston
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, Rankine Avenue, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride G75 0QF, Scotland, UK
Philippa L Ascough*
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, Rankine Avenue, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride G75 0QF, Scotland, UK
Mark H Garnett
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Facility, Rankine Avenue, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride G75 0QF, Scotland, UK
Michael I Bird
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Converting biomass to charcoal produces physical and chemical changes greatly increasing environmental recalcitrance, leading to great interest in the potential of this carbon form as a long-term sequestration strategy for climate change mitigation. Uncertainty remains, however, over the timescale of charcoal’s environmental stability, with estimates varying from decadal to millennial scales. Uncertainty also remains over charcoal’s effect on other aspects of carbon biogeochemical cycling and allied nutrient cycles such as nitrogen. Radiocarbon is a powerful tool to investigate charcoal mineralization due to its sensitivity; here we report the results of a study using 14C-dead charcoal (pMC=0.137±0.002) in organic-rich soil (pMC=99.76±0.46), assessing charcoal degradation over 55 days of incubation. Using this method, we discriminated between decomposition of indigenous soil organic matter (SOM) and charcoal by microorganisms. SOM was the major source of carbon respired from the soil, but there was also a contribution from charcoal carbon mineralization. This contribution was 2.1 and 1.1% on days 27 and 55, respectively. We also observed a negative priming effect due to charcoal additions to soil, where SOM mineralization was repressed by up to 14.1%, presumably arising from physico-chemical interactions between soil and charcoal.

Keywords

biocharblack carboncharcoalmolecular sievesoil respiration
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 905 - 919
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amato, M, Ladd, JN. 1988. Assay for microbial biomass based on ninhydrin-reactive nitrogen in extracts of fumigated soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 20:107–114.Google Scholar
Anderson, T-H, Domsch, DKH. 1993. The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 25(3):393–395.Google Scholar
Anderson, JM, Ingram, JSI. 1993. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Antal, MJ, Grønli, M. 2003. The art, science and technology of charcoal production. Industrial Engineering and Chemistry Research 42(8):1619–1640.Google Scholar
Ascough, PL, Bird, MI, Francis, SM, Thornton, B, Midwood, A, Scott, AC, Apperley, D. 2011. Variability in oxidative degradation of charcoal: influence of production variables and environmental exposure. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 75(9):2361–2378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, MI, Ascough, PL. 2012. Isotopes in pyrogenic carbon: a review. Organic Geochemistry 42(12):1529–1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, MI, Moyo, E, Veenendaal, E, Lloyd, JJ, Frost, P. 1999. Stability of elemental carbon in a savanna soil. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 13(4):923–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blagodatskaya, E, Kuzyakov, Y. 2008. Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: critical review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 45(2):115–131.Google Scholar
Blagodatskaya, E, Yuyukina, T, Blagodatsky, S, Kuzyakov, Y. 2011. Three-source-partitioning of microbial biomass and of CO2 efflux from soil to evaluate mechanisms of priming effects. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 43(4):778–786.Google Scholar
Box, JD. 1983. Investigation of the Folin-Ciocalteau phenol reagent for the determination of polyphenolic substances in natural waters. Water Research 17(5):511–525.Google Scholar
Cataldo, DA, Haroon, M, Schrader, LE, Youngs, VL. 1975. Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissues by nitration of salicylic acid. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 6(1):71–80.Google Scholar
Ciais, P, Sabine, C, Bala, G, Bopp, L, Bovkin, V, Canadell, J, Chhabra, A, DeFreis, R, Galloway, J, Heimann, M, Jones, C, Le Quéré, C, Myneni, RB, Piao, S, Thornton, P. 2013. Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. In: Stocker TF, Quin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, editors. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 465–570.Google Scholar
Clinton, PW, Buchanan, PK, Wilkie, JP, Smail, SJ, Kimberley, MO. 2009. Decomposition of Nothofagus wood in vitro and nutrient mobilization by fungi. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39(11):2193–2202.Google Scholar
Clough, TJ, Condron, LM, Kammann, C, Müller, C. 2013. A review of biochar and soil nitrogen dynamics. Agronomy 3(2):275–293.Google Scholar
Collinson, ME, Featherstone, C, Cripps, JA, Nichols, GJ, Scott, AC. 2000. Charcoal-rich plant debris accumulations in the lower cretaceous of the Isle of Wight, England. Acta Palaeobotanica 164:93–105.Google Scholar
Cresser, M, Kilham, K, Edwards, T. 1993. Soil Chemistry and Its Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, A, Sohi, SP. 2011. The priming potential of biochar products in relation to labile carbon contents and soil organic matter status. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 43(10):2127–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, DN, Gleeson, DB, Solaiman, ZM, Jones, DL, Murphy, DV. 2012. Decreased soil microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralisation with Eucalyptus biochar addition to a coarse textured soil. Plant and Soil 354(1):311–324.Google Scholar
Garnett, MH, Murray, C. 2013. Processing of CO2 samples collected using zeolite molecular sieve for 14C analysis at the NERC Radiocarbon Facility (East Kilbride UK). Radiocarbon 55(2–3):410–415.Google Scholar
Garnett, MH, Bol, R, Bardgett, RD, Wanek, W, Bäumler, R, Richter, A. 2011. Natural abundance radiocarbon in soil microbial biomass: results from a glacial foreland. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 43(6):1356–1361.Google Scholar
Gurwick, NP, Moore, LA, Kelly, C, Elias, P. 2013. A systematic review of biochar research, with a focus on its stability in situ and its promise as a climate change mitigation strategy. PLoS ONE 8:e75932.Google Scholar
Hardie, SML, Garnett, MH, Fallick, AE, Rowland, AP, Ostle, NJ. 2005. Carbon dioxide capture using a zeolite molecular sieve sampling system for isotopic studies (13C and 14C) of respiration. Radiocarbon 47(3):441–451.Google Scholar
Holdgate, GR, McGowran, B, Fromhold, T, Wagstaff, BE, Gallagher, SJ, Wallace, MW, Sluiter, IRK, Whitelaw, M. 2009. Eocene-Miocene carbon isotope and floral record from brown coalseams in the Gippsland Basin of southeast Australia. Global and Planetary Change 65(1–2):89–103.Google Scholar
Hopkins, DW, Chudek, JA. 1997. Solid-state NMR investigations of organic transformations during the decomposition of plant material in soil. In: Cadisch G, Giller KE, editors. Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition. Wallingford: CAB International. p 85–94.Google Scholar
International Biochar Initiative. 2013. Standardized product definition and product testing guidelines for biochar that is used in soil. http://www.biochar-international.org/characterizationstandard. Accessed 16 February 2016.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, DS, Fox, RH, Rayner, JH. 1985. Interactions between fertilizer nitrogen and soil nitrogen—the so-called ‘priming’ effect. Journal of Soil Science 36(3):425–444.Google Scholar
Jenny, H, Gessel, S, Bingham, F. 1949. Comparative study of decomposition rates in temperate and tropical regions. Soil Science 68(6):419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joergensen, RG. 1996. Quantification of the microbial biomass by determining ninhydrin-reactive N. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 28(3):301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasozi, GN, Zimmerman, AR, Nkedi-Kizza, P, Gao, B. 2010. Catechol and humic acid sorption onto a range of laboratory-produced black carbons (biochars). Environmental Science & Technology 44(16):6189–6195.Google Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y, Friedel, JK, Stahr, K. 2000. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 32(11–12):1485–1498.Google Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y, Subbotina, I, Chen, H, Bogomolova, I, Xu, X. 2009. Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labelling. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 41(2):210–219.Google Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y, Bogomolova, I, Glaser, B. 2014. Biochar stability in soil: decomposition during eight years and transformation as assessed by compound-specific 14C analysis. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 70:229–236.Google Scholar
Leavitt, SW, Paul, EA, Kimball, BA, Hendrey, GR, Mauney, JR, Rauschkolb, R, Rogers, H, Lewin, KF, Nagy, J, Pinter, PJ, Johnson, HB. 1994. Carbon isotope dynamics of free-air CO2-enriched cotton and soils. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 70(1–4):87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, J, Gaunt, J, Rondon, M. 2006. Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems – a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11(2):403–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linn, DM, Doran, JW. 1984. Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and non-tilled soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48(6):1267–1272.Google Scholar
Lofts, S, Spurgeon, DJ, Svendsen, C, Tipping, E. 2004. Deriving soil critical limits for Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb: a method based on free ion concentrations. Environmental Science & Technology 38(13):3623–3631.Google Scholar
Major, J, Lehmann, J, Rondon, M, Goodale, C. 2010. Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Global Change Biology 16(4):1366–1379.Google Scholar
Marstorp, H. 1997. Kinetically defined litter fractions based on respiration measurements. In: Cadisch G, Giller KE, editors. Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition. Wallingford: CAB International. p 95–104.Google Scholar
Miltner, A, Bombach, P, Schmidt-Brücken, B, Kästner, M. 2012. SOM genesis: microbial biomass as a significant source. Biogeochemistry 111(1):41–55.Google Scholar
Northup, RT, Yu, ZS, Dahlgren, RA, Vogt, KA. 1995. Polyphenol control of nitrogen release from pine litter. Nature 377(6546):227–229.Google Scholar
Odum, E. 1985. Trends expected in stressed ecosystems. Bioscience 35(7):419–422.Google Scholar
Pataki, DE, Ellsworth, DS, Evans, RD, Gonzalez-Meler, M, King, J, Leavitt, SW, Lin, G, Matamala, R, Pendall, E, Siegwolf, R, van Kessel, C, Ehleringer, JR. 2003. Tracing changes in ecosystem function under elevated carbon dioxide conditions. BioScience 53(9):805–818.Google Scholar
Preston, CM, Schmidt, MWI. 2006. Black (pyrogenic) carbon: a synthesis of current knowledge and uncertainties with special consideration of boreal regions. Biogeosciences 3:397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, MJ. 2001. Carbon dioxide within controlled environments, the commonly neglected variable. Proceedings of the International Conference: Controlled Environments in the New Millennium, Norwich. http://biology.mcgill.ca/Phytotron/Romer2001-CO2.pdf. Accessed 16 February 2016.Google Scholar
Šantrůčková, H, Šimek, M. 1997. Effect of soil CO2 concentration on microbial biomass. Biology and Fertility of Soils 25(3):269–273.Google Scholar
Schmidt, MWI, Skjemstad, JO, Jäger, C. 2002. Carbon isotope geochemistry and nanomorphology of soil black carbon: black chernozemic soils in central Europe originate from ancient biomass burning. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16(4):1123–1130.Google Scholar
Šimek, M, Cooper, JE. 2002. The influence of soil pH on denitrification: progress towards the understanding of this interaction over the last 50 years. European Journal of Soil Science 53(3):345–354.Google Scholar
Šimek, M, Jíšová, L, Hopkins, DW. 2002. What is the so-called optimum pH for denitrification in soil? Soil Biology & Biochemistry 34(9):1227–1234.Google Scholar
Slota, P, Jull, AJT, Linick, T, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–306.Google Scholar
Soffe, RJ. editor. 1995. The Agricultural Notebook. Oxford: Blackwell Science. 646. p.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 10th edition. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Sparling, GP. 1997. Soil microbial biomass, activity and nutrient cycling as indicators of soil health. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR, editors. Biological Indicators of Soil Health. Wallingford: CAB International. p 97–119.Google Scholar
Staddon, PL, Ramsey, CB, Ostle, H, Ineson, P, Fitter, AH. 2003. Rapid turnover of hyphae of mycorrhizal fungi determined by AMS microanalysis of 14C. Science 300(5622):1138–1140.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.Google Scholar
Topham, S. 1986. Carbon dioxide. In: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. New York: John Wiley. p 165–183.Google Scholar
Werner, RA, Bruch, BA, Brand, WA. 1999. ConFlo III – an interface for high precision δ13C and δ15N analysis with an extended dynamic range. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 13(13):1237–1241.Google Scholar
Wilson, MA. 1987. NMR Techniques and Applications in Geochemistry and Soil Chemistry. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, AR, Gao, B, Ahn, M-Y. 2011. Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 43(6):1169–1179.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, M, Bird, MI, Wurster, C, Saiz, G, Goodrick, I, Barta, J, Capek, P, Santruckova, H, Smernik, R. 2012. Rapid degradation of pyrogenic carbon. Global Change Biology 18(11):3306–3316.Google Scholar