Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:04:39.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PREMATURE OXIDATION DURING ARGON PLASMA CLEANING OF WATER-RICH RADIOCARBON SAMPLES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2022

J Royce Cox ,
Eric Blinman ,
Lukas Wacker Open the ORCID record for Lukas Wacker [Opens in a new window]  and
Marvin W Rowe Open the ORCID record for Marvin W Rowe [Opens in a new window]
J Royce Cox
Affiliation:
Office of Archaeological Studies, Center for New Mexico Archaeology, 7 Old Cochiti Road, Santa Fe, NM87507, USA
Eric Blinman
Affiliation:
Office of Archaeological Studies, Center for New Mexico Archaeology, 7 Old Cochiti Road, Santa Fe, NM87507, USA
Lukas Wacker
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH Zürich, HPK, H29, Otto-Stern-Weg 5, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Marvin W Rowe*
Affiliation:
Office of Archaeological Studies, Center for New Mexico Archaeology, 7 Old Cochiti Road, Santa Fe, NM87507, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plasma oxidation for 14C sampling utilizes low-pressure (133 Pa), low-energy (<50 W), and low- temperature (<50°C) Ar- and O2-plasmas generating CO2 for AMS dating. O2-plasmas on empty chambers remove organic contamination. When clean, a new specimen is inserted and Ar-plasmas dislodge adsorbed atmospheric CO2 from surfaces. Finally, O2-plasmas oxidize organic materials to CO2 for AMS analysis. During some Ar-plasmas we observed anomalous pressure increases and unexpectedly high CO2. Residual gas analysis detected water, hydrogen and oxygen species with Ar and CO2 indicating water plasmas that produced excited oxygen species that prematurely oxidized specimen organic matter. Evolution of excess CO2 during Ar cleaning compromises the ability to affirm that atmospheric CO2 was removed. Standards, TIRI Belfast Pine and VIRI I Whalebone, were dated to determine whether water-induced oxidation was a confounding influence in dating. TIRI wood was sampled twice, once a water-soaked specimen in an Ar plasma and once with water-vapor-plasma only. The TIRI dates agreed with six earlier dates on usual specimens. A colloidal extract from VIRI I whale bone was also sampled and dated twice using both water–plasma oxidation in an Ar-plasma and in an O2-plasma. Dating agreement suggests that water plasmas do not pose undue risks of contamination.

Keywords

argon plasmasCO2 productionoxygen plasmasradiocarbon datingwater plasmas
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , February 2022 , pp. 21 - 34
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armitage, RA, Ellis, ME, Merrell, C. 2012. New developments in the “non-destructive” dating of perishable artifacts using plasma chemical oxidation. In: Lang PL, Armitage RA, editors. Collaborative endeavors in the chemical analysis of art and cultural heritage materials. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society Symposium Series, American Chemical Society. p. 143–154.Google Scholar
Chaffee, SD, Hyman, M, Rowe, MW. 1993. AMS 14C dating of rock paintings. In:, Steinbring J, Faulstich P, Watchman A, Taçon PSC, editors. Time and space: dating and spatial considerations in rock art. Research Publication 8. Melbourne, Australia: Occasional Australian Rock Art Research Association. p. 67–73.Google Scholar
Ellis, ME. 2008. The development of a novel and potentially nondestructive pretreatment for the radiocarbon dating of archaeological artifacts [master’s thesis]. Paper 211. Ypsilanti, Michigan: Eastern Michigan UniversityGoogle Scholar
Fahrni, SM, Wacker, L, Synal, H-A, Szidat, S. 2013. Improving a gas ion source for 14C AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mook, WG, Waterbolk, HT. 1985. Handbooks for archaeologists: No. 3, radiocarbon dating. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation. p. 27–28.Google Scholar
Nguyen, SVT, Foster, JE, Gallimore, AD. 2009. Operating a radio-frequency plasma source on water vapor. Review of Scientific Instruments 80:1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, MW. 2005. Non-destructive radiocarbon dating. Paper #155. In: Art ’05 – 8th International Conference on Non-Destructive and Microanalysis for the Diagnostics and Conservation of the Cultural and Environmental Heritage, CD. University of Lecce, Italy. 13 p.Google Scholar
Rowe, MW. 2009. Radiocarbon dating of ancient rock paintings. Analytical Chemistry 81:1728–1735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, MW, Blinman, E, Martin, JC, Cox, JR, MacKenzie, M, Wacker, L. 2017. Cold plasma oxidation and “nondestructive” radiocarbon sampling. In: Britt T, editor. Proceedings of the Twenty-year retrospective of National Center for Preservation Technology and Training. Natchitoches, LA: National Center for Preservation Technology and Training. ISBN:electronic format 978-9970440-3-4. p. 64–77.Google Scholar
Ruff, M, Wacker, L, Gäggeler, HW, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Szidat, S. 2007. A gas ion source for radiocarbon measurements at 200 kV. Radiocarbon 49:307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russ, J, Hyman, M, Shafer, HJ, Rowe, MW. 1990. Radiocarbon dating of prehistoric rock paintings by selective oxidation of organic carbon. Nature 348:710–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Naysmith, P, Staff, RA. 2019. Learning from the wood samples in ICS, TIRI, FIRI, VIRI, and SIRI. Radiocarbon 61(5):1293–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Gordon, GT, Naysmith, P. 2010. A report on phase 2 of the Fifth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (VIRI). Radiocarbon 52(2–3):846–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steelman, KL. 2004. Non-destructive radiocarbon and stable isotope analyses of archaeological materials using plasma oxidation [Ph.D. dissertation]. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Steelman, KL, Rowe, MW. 2002. Potential for virtually nondestructive radiocarbon and stable carbon isotopic analyses on perishable archaeological artifacts. In: Jakes KA, editor. Archaeological chemistry: materials, methods, and Meanings. Oxford University Press. American Chemical Society Symposium Series 831. p. 8–21.Google Scholar
Steelman, KL, Rowe, MW. 2004. Non-destructive plasma-chemical extraction of carbon from organic artefacts. In: Higham T, Ramsey C, Owen C, editors. Radiocarbon and archaeology. Oxbow Books, Oxford: Oxbow Books. p. 35–42.Google Scholar
Steelman, KL, Rowe, MW. 2012. Radiocarbon dating of rock paintings: incorporating pictographs into the archaeological record. In: MacDonald J, Veth P, editors. A companion to rock art. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. p. 565–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steelman, KL, Rowe, MW, Turpin, S, Guilderson, T, Nightengale, L. 2004. Nondestructive radiocarbon dating: naturally mummified infant bundle from SW Texas. American Antiquity 69:741–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, M, Steelman, KL, Guilderson, T, Dering, P, Rowe, MW 2006. Lower Pecos and Coahuila peyote: new radiocarbon dates. Journal of Archaeological Science 33:1017–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Fahrni, SM, Hajdas, I, Molnar, Synal, H-A, Szidat, S, Zhang, YL. 2013. A versatile gas interface for routine radiocarbon analysis with a gas ion source. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar