Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:47:39.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE NEW RADIOCARBON DATASET FOR TRILITH MONUMENTS OF SOUTHEASTERN ARABIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2020

R Garba*
Affiliation:
CRL DRD, Nuclear Physics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Truhlářce 39/64, CZ-180 86 Prague, Czech Republic Department of Asian, African and Mediterranean Studies, Università di Napoli L’Orientale, Italy
P Demján
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, CZ-118 01 Prague, Czech Republic
I Svetlik
Affiliation:
CRL DRD, Nuclear Physics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Truhlářce 39/64, CZ-180 86 Prague, Czech Republic
D Dreslerová
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, CZ-118 01 Prague, Czech Republic
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Triliths are megalithic monuments scattered across the coastal plains of southern and southeastern Arabia. They consist of aligned standing stones with a parallel row of large hearths and form a space, the meaning of which is undoubtedly significant but nonetheless still unknown. This paper presents a new radiocarbon (14C) dataset acquired during the two field seasons 2018–2019 of the TSMO (Trilith Stone Monuments of Oman) project which investigated the spatial and temporal patterns of the triliths. The excavation and sampling of trilith hearths across Oman yielded a dataset of 30 new 14C dates, extending the use of trilith monuments to as early as the Iron Age III period (600–300 BC). The earlier dates are linked to two-phase trilith sites in south-central Oman. The three 14C pairs collected from the two-phase trilith sites indicated gaps between the trilith construction phases from 35 to 475 years (2 σ). The preliminary spatio-temporal analysis shows the geographical expansion of populations using trilith monuments during the 5th to 1st century BC and a later pull back in the 1st and 2nd century AD. The new 14C dataset for trilith sites will help towards a better understanding of Iron Age communities in southeastern Arabia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2020 by The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

al-Jahwari, N. 2013. The Early Bronze Age funerary archaeological landscape of western Ja’alan: Results of three seasons of investigation. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 24(2):151173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Jahwari, N. 2018. Al-Aḥǧār aṯ-ṯalāṯīya fī manṭiqat Ǧaʿlān Banī Bū Ḥasan, al-Manṭiqaaš-Šarqīya bi-Salṭanat ʿUmān. Adumatu 38:63–90.Google Scholar
al-Shahri, A. 1991. Grave-types and ‘triliths’ in Dhofar. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 2/3:182195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Shahri A. 2000. The language of Aad [privately printed].Google Scholar
Bin ‘Aqil, AJ, McCorriston, J. 2009. Prehistoric small-scale monument types in Hadramawt (southern Arabia). Antiquity 83:602618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2008. Radiocarbon dating: revolutions in understanding. Archaeometry 50:249275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2017. Methods for summarizing radiocarbon datasets. Radiocarbon 59(6):18091833. doi: 10.1017/RDC.2017.108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremaschi, M, Negrino, F. 2002. The frankincense road of Sumhuram: Palaeoenvironmental and prehistorical background. In: Avanzini, A, editor. Khor Rori Report 1. (Arabia Antica, 1). Pisa: Edizioni Plus. p. 325364.Google Scholar
Curie, LA. 1995. Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendation 1995). Pure & Appl. Chem. 67(10):16991723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Cardi, B, Doe, B, Roskams, P. 1977. Excavation and survey in the Sharqiyah, Oman, 1976. Journal of Oman Studies 3(1):1733.Google Scholar
Demján, P, Pavúk, P. In press. Clustering of calibrated radiocarbon dates: site-specific chronological sequences identified by dense radiocarbon sampling. Radiocarbon.Google Scholar
Doe, B. 1977. Gazetteer of sites in Oman, 1976. Journal of Oman Studies 3(1):3557.Google Scholar
Dostal, W. 1968. Zur Megalithfrage in Südarabien. Festschrift Werner Caskel. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dreslerová, D, Kozáková, R, Metlička, M, Brychová, V, Bobek, P, Čišecký, Č, Demján, P, Lisá, L, Pokorná, A, Michálek, J, Strouhalová, B, Trubač, J. 2020. Seeking the meaning of a unique mountain site through a multidisciplinary approach. The Late La Tène site at Sklářské Valley, Šumava Mountains, Czech Republic. Quaternary International 542:88108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garba, R. 2017. Triliths, the stone monuments of southern Arabia—study. Internal report to the Ministry of Heritage and Culture, Sultanate of Oman [unpublished circulated report].Google Scholar
Garba, R. 2018. Triliths. Hinterland monuments of ancient nomads. In: Cleuziou S, Tosi M. In the shadow of the ancestors: the prehistoric foundations of the early Arabian civilization in Oman. Edited by Frenez D, Garba R. Chapter 48. 2nd edition. Ministry of Heritage and Culture, Sultanate of Oman.Google Scholar
Garba, R. 2019. Triliths, the stone monuments of Southern Arabia: preliminary results and path towards the interpretation. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 49:147158. Archaeopress, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Garba, R, Maiorano, MP, Stefanisko, D, Chlachula, D, Al-Ghafri, W. 2019. Trilith stone monuments of Oman (TSMO): final report of the 1st season 2018–2019 (Field missions TSMO 1A & 1B). Release: June 2019. Ministry of Heritage and Culture, Sultanate of Oman [unpublished circulated report].Google Scholar
Garba, R, Danielisová, A, Maiorano, MP, Abbas, M, Chlachula, D, Daněček, D, Al-Ghafri, W, Neuhuber, S, Štefanisko, D, Trubač, J. 2020. TSMO research project. Report of the 2nd season 2019–2020. Ministry of Heritage and Culture, Sultanate of Oman [unpublished circulated report].Google Scholar
Genchi, F, Garba, R, Martino, G, Maiorano, MP, Al-Ghafri, W. 2016. Final report from Duqm Survey Project 2015. Ministry of Heritage and Culture, Sultanate of Oman [unpublished circulated report].Google Scholar
Genchi, F, Garba, R, Martino, G, Maiorano, MP, Al-Ghafri, W. 2017. An archaeological overview on the landscape of the Duqm development area, Sultanate of Oman (poster). Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 47:93100.Google Scholar
Gupta, S, Polach, H. 1985. Radiocarbon dating practices at ANU. Canberra: ANU.Google Scholar
Handlos, P, Svetlik, I, Horáčková, L, Fejgl, M, Kotik, L, Brychova, V, Megisova, N, Marecova, K. 2018. Bomb peak: radiocarbon dating of skeletal remains in routine forensic medical practice. Radiocarbon 60(4):10171028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrower, M, Senn, M, McCorriston, J. 2014. Tombs, triliths and oases: the Arabian Human Social Dynamics Project (AHSD) archaeological survey 2009–2010. Journal of Oman Studies 18: 145151.Google Scholar
Heaton, TJ, Blaauw, M, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, PJ, Scott, EM. 2020. The IntCal20 approach to radiocarbon calibration curve construction: a new methodology using Bayesian splines and errors-in-variables. Radiocarbon 62(4):821863. doi: 10.1017/RDC.2020.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagher, R, Pümpin, Ch. 2010. A new approach to central Omani prehistory. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 40: 185200.Google Scholar
Jagher, R, Pümpin, Ch, Wegmuller, F, Winet, I. 2011. Central Oman Palaeolithic survey report: 2007 season. Journal of Oman Studies 17:1550.Google Scholar
Jull, A, Burr, G, Beck, J, Hodgins, G, Biddulph, D, Gann, J, Hatheway, A, Lange, T, Lifton, N. 2006. Application of accelerator mass spectrometry to environmental and paleoclimate studies at the University of Arizona. Radioactivity in the Environment 8:323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorriston, J, Steimer-Herbet, T, Harrower, M, Williams, K, Saliège, J, Bin‘Aqil, A. 2011. Gazetteer of small-scale monuments in prehistoric Hadramawt, Yemen: a radiocarbon chronology from RASA-AHSD project research 1996–2008. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 22(1):122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorriston, J, Harrower, M, Steimer, T, Williams, K, Senn, M, Al Hādhari, M, Al Kathīrī, M, Al Kathīrī, A, Saliège, J, Everhart, J. 2014. Monuments and landscape of mobile pastoralists in Dhofar: the Arabian Human Social Dynamics (AHSD) Project, 2009–2011. Journal of Oman Studies 12: 117144.Google Scholar
Molnár, M, Janovics, R, Major, I, Orsovszki, J, Gönczi, R, Veres, M, Leonard, A, Castle, S, Lange, T, Wacker, L, Hajdas, I, Jull, A. 2013a. Status report of the new AMS 14C sample preparation lab of the Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies (Debrecen, Hungary). Radiocarbon 55(2–3):665676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnár, M, Rinyu, L, Veres, M, Seiler, M, Wacker, L, Synal, H-A. 2013b. EnvironMICADAS: a mini 14C-AMS with enhanced gas ion source interface in the Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies (HEKAL), Hungary. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):338344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, L, Zarins, J. 2010. Preliminary results of the Dhofar archaeological survey. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 40:247266.Google Scholar
Orsovszki, G, Rinyu, L. 2015. Flame-sealed tube graphitization using zinc as the sole reduction agent: Precision improvement of Environ MICADAS 14C measurements on graphite targets. Radiocarbon 57(5):979990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Ramsey, CB, Buck, CE, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):18691887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinyu, L, Orsovszki, G, Futó, I, Veres, M, Molnár, M. 2015. Application of zinc sealed tube graphitization on sub-milligram samples using Environ MICADAS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research 361:406413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rougeulle, A. 1999. Coastal settlements in southern Yemen: The 1996–1997 survey expeditions on the Ḥaḍramawt and Mahra coasts. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 29:123136.Google Scholar
Rousseeuw, PJ. 1987. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20:5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simek, P, Megisová, N, Bemš, J. 2019. Preparation of wood, charcoal and bone collagen micro samples using automat for AMS radiocarbon dating. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 186(2–3):433436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thesiger, W. 1946. A new journey in Southern Arabia. The Geographical Journal 108(4/6):129145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, B. 1929a. Among some unknown tribes of South Arabia. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 59:97111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, B. 1929b. The south-eastern borderlands of Rub’ al Khali. The Geographical Journal 73(3):193212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, P. 2013. Late pre-Islamic Oman: the inner evidence, the outside view. In: Hoffman-Ruf, M, Salami, A, editors. Studies on Ibadism and Oman: Oman and overseas. ii. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. p. 1333.Google Scholar
Yule, P. 2014. Cross-roads: Early and Late Iron Age south-eastern Arabia. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Yule, P. 2016. Valorising the Samad Late Iron Age. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 27:3171. doi: 10.1111/aae.12060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, P. 2018. Toward an identity for the Samad period population (Sultanate of Oman). Zeitschrift für Orient-Archäologie 11:438486.Google Scholar
Zarins, J. 2001. The land of incense: archaeological work in the Governorate of Dhofar, Sultanate of Oman, 1990–1995. Muscat: Sultan Qaboos University Publications.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Garba et al. Supplementary Materials

Garba et al. Supplementary Materials 1

Download Garba et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 1.1 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Garba et al. Supplementary Materials

Garba et al. Supplementary Materials 2

Download Garba et al. Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 32.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Garba et al. Supplementary Materials

Garba et al. Supplementary Materials 3

Download Garba et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 2.2 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Garba et al. Supplementary Materials

Garba et al. Supplementary Materials 4

Download Garba et al. Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 39.6 KB