Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:19:09.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Collaborative Study: Structuring and Sample Preparation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

G T Cook ,
D D Harkness ,
B F Miller ,
E M Scott ,
M S Baxter  and
T C Aitchison
G T Cook
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Research & Reactor Centre, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 0QU, Scotland
D D Harkness
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Laboratory, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 0QU, Scotland
B F Miller
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Laboratory, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 0QU, Scotland
E M Scott
Affiliation:
Statistics Department, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, Scotland
M S Baxter
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Research & Reactor Centre, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 0QU, Scotland
T C Aitchison
Affiliation:
Statistics Department, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, Scotland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The success of any intercomparison exercise depends largely on participation and cooperation of a sufficient number of laboratories and the selection of a suitable suite of samples. Unless the latter is satisfactorily devised, the former cannot be guaranteed. The hierarchical nature of this study has necessarily resulted in a far more comprehensive set of sample types than has previously been employed. The exercise was structured to satisfy the following criteria: 1) to enable the participating laboratories to assess the experimental precision and accuracy of the component stages of the dating process; 2) samples should be typical of those routinely dated by the laboratories. This takes on a particular significance in Stage 1 where they should resemble as closely as possible the counting medium; 3) an objective statistical analysis of the results at each component stage of the study.

Type
Session I
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 32 , Issue 3: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercomparison of Radiocarbon Laboratories , 1990 , pp. 267 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Harkness, DD, Cook, GT, Miller, BF, Scott, EM and Baxter, MS 1989 Design and preparation of samples for the international collaborative study. in Long, A and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 13th, Proc. Radiocarbon 31(3): 407–413.Google Scholar
International Study Group 1982 An inter-laboratory comparison of radiocarbon measurements in tree-rings. Nature 298: 619–623.Google Scholar
International Study Group 1983 An international tree-ring replicate study. in Waterbolk, HT and Mook, WG, eds, Proc. Strasbourg, Pact 8: 123–133.Google Scholar
Otlet, RL, Walker, AJ, Hewson, AD and Burleigh, R 1980 14C interlaboratory comparison in the UK: Experiment design, preparation and preliminary results. in Stuiver, M and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 10th, Proc. Radiocarbon 22(3): 936–947.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Baxter, MS, Aitchison, TC, Harkness, DD and Cook, GT 1986 Announcement of a new collaborative study for intercalibration of 14C dating laboratories. Radiocarbon 28(1): 167–169.Google Scholar