Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T05:50:10.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydrological Implications from 14C Profiling of UK Tufa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

P M Thorpe ,
R L Otlet  and
M M Sweeting
P M Thorpe
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UKAEA Harwell and University of Oxford, England
R L Otlet
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UKAEA Harwell and University of Oxford, England
M M Sweeting
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UKAEA Harwell and University of Oxford, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Tufa is a superficial, secondary deposit of calcium carbonate which accumulates on precipitation from emergent spring waters. It occurs as discrete, localized masses in regions of calcareous country rock.

In the United Kingdom, deposits vary widely in structure and thickness but little is known of the rate of deposition. Some deposits contain laminae assumed to represent annual growth increments and which should contain a 14C and stable isotope record related to the original water from which it was precipitated.

Investigations are reported on tufa from, three areas of different limestones in the United Kingdom (Northwest Yorkshire, South Derbyshire and North Oxfordshire).

Hydrologically, the dating of tufa by 14C involves the same problems as the dating of groundwater. In the case of actively forming tufa, however, it is possible to derive a sequence of measurements, beginning with present day deposition, which clearly demonstrates the applications of age corrections.

At Gordale Scar, Northwest Yorkshire, a profiling study of laminated tufa appears to show bomb trial 14C to a depth of 18mm below the surface, with almost constant values around 50 percent modern (raw data) from 18 to 48mm below the surface. The 14C content of surface tufa lies within the seasonal range of 14C measurements from the parent stream waters.

Results of 50 percent modern in the sequence are consistent with the simplest correction procedures based on δ13C balance and the observed δ13C change on tufa precipitation is a practical demonstration of the fractionation factor ∊13. However, the application of corrections to active, surface tufa and parent waters collected monthly over a period of study (14 months) from all three sites, produce results higher than would be expected from published world 14C levels.

Type
Soils and Groundwater
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 22 , Issue 3: Heidelberg , 1980 , pp. 897 - 908
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science

References

Broecker, W S and Walton, A, 1959, The geochemistry of 14C in fresh-water systems: Geochim et Cosmochim Acta, v 16, p 15–38.10.1016/0016-7037(59)90044-4Google Scholar
Craig, Harmon, 1957, Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass-spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide: Geochim et Cosmochim Acta, v 12, p 133–149.Google Scholar
Deines, P, Langmuir, D, and Harmon, R S, 1974, Stable carbon isotope ratios and the existence of a gas phase in the evolution of carbonate ground waters: Geochim et Cosmoshim Acta, v 38, p 1147–1164.Google Scholar
Downing, R A, Smith, D B, Pearson, F J, Monkhouse, R A, and Otlet, R L, 1977, The age of groundwater in the Lincolnshire Limestone, England and its relevance to the flow mechanism: Jour Hydrology, v 33, p 201–216.10.1016/0022-1694(77)90035-XGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S, Buchsbaum, R, Lowenstam, H A, and Urey, H C, 1953, Revised carbonate-water isotopic temperature scale, Geol Soc America Bull, v 64, p 1315.Google Scholar
Friedman, Irving, 1970, Some investigations of the deposition of travertine from hot springs-1. The isotopic chemistry of a travertine-depositing spring: Geochim et Cosmochim Acta, v 34, p 1303–1315.Google Scholar
Gonfiantini, R, Panichi, C, and Tongiorgi, E, 1968, Isotopic disequilibrium in travertine deposition: Earth Planetary Sci Letters, v 5, p 55–58.Google Scholar
Pearson, F J, Fisher, D W, and Plummer, L N, 1978, Correction of ground-water chemistry and carbon isotopic composition for effects of CO2 outgassing: Geochim et Cosmochim Acta, v 42, p 1799–1807.10.1016/0016-7037(78)90235-1Google Scholar
Smith, D I and Atkinson, T C, 1977, Underground flow in cavernous limestones with special reference to the Malham area: Field Studies, v 4, p 597–616.Google Scholar
Usdowski, E, Hoefs, J, and Menschel, G, 1978, Relationships between 12C and 18O fractionation and changes in major element composition in a recent calcite-depositing stream — a model of chemical variations with inorganic CaCO3 precipitation: Earth Planetary Sci Letters, v 42, p 267–276.10.1016/0012-821X(79)90034-7Google Scholar
Wigley, T M L, Plummer, L N, and Pearson, F Jr., 1978, Mass transfer and carbon isotopic evolution in natural water systems: Geochim et Cosmochim Acta, v 42, p 1117–1139.Google Scholar