Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T03:49:31.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-Resolution AMS 14C Dating of Post-Bomb Peat Archives of Atmospheric Pollutants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Michael E Goodsite ,
Werner Rom ,
Jan Heinemeier ,
Todd Lange ,
Suat Ooi ,
Peter G Appleby ,
William Shotyk ,
W O van der Knaap ,
Christian Lohse  and
Torben S Hansen
Michael E Goodsite
Affiliation:
Environmental Chemistry Research Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark Present affiliation: National Environmental Research Institute of Denmark, Department of Atmospheric Environment, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O. Box 358, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark. Email: [email protected].
Werner Rom
Affiliation:
AMS 14C Dating Laboratory, Institute for Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade, DK-8000 århus C, Denmark
Jan Heinemeier
Affiliation:
AMS 14C Dating Laboratory, Institute for Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade, DK-8000 århus C, Denmark
Todd Lange
Affiliation:
NSF-Arizona AMS Facility, Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Physics Building, 1118 East Fourth St, P.O. Box 210081, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0081, USA
Suat Ooi
Affiliation:
NSF-Arizona AMS Facility, Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Physics Building, 1118 East Fourth St, P.O. Box 210081, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0081, USA
Peter G Appleby
Affiliation:
Environmental Radioactivity Research Centre, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX, England
William Shotyk
Affiliation:
Geological Institute, University of Berne, Baltzerstrasse 1, CH-3012 Berne, Switzerland
W O van der Knaap
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Berne, Altenbergrain 21, CH-3013 Berne, Switzerland
Christian Lohse
Affiliation:
Environmental Chemistry Research Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
Torben S Hansen
Affiliation:
Environmental Chemistry Research Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Peat deposits in Greenland and Denmark were investigated to show that high-resolution dating of these archives of atmospheric deposition can be provided for the last 50 years by radiocarbon dating using the atmospheric bomb pulse. 14C was determined in macrofossils from sequential one cm slices using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). Values were calibrated with a general-purpose curve derived from annually averaged atmospheric 14CO2 values in the northernmost northern hemisphere (NNH, 30°–90°N). We present a thorough review of 14C bomb-pulse data from the NNH including our own measurements made in tree rings and seeds from Arizona as well as other previously published data. We show that our general-purpose calibration curve is valid for the whole NNH producing accurate dates within 1–2 years. In consequence, 14C AMS can precisely date individual points in recent peat deposits within the range of the bomb-pulse (from the mid-1950s on). Comparing the 14C AMS results with the customary dating method for recent peat profiles by 210Pb, we show that the use of 137Cs to validate and correct 210Pb dates proves to be more problematic than previously supposed.

As a unique example of our technique, we show how this chronometer can be applied to identify temporal changes in Hg concentrations from Danish and Greenland peat cores.

Type
I. Our ‘Dry’ Environment: Above Sea Level
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 43 , Issue 2B: Proceedings of the 17th International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 2 of 3), Conference Editors: Israel Carmi, Elisabetta Boaretto , 2001 , pp. 495 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Appleby, PG. 1998. Dating recent sediments by 210Pb: Problems and solutions. Proc. 2nd NKS/EKO-1 Seminar, Helsinki, 2–4 April 1997, STUK, Helsinki. p 7–24.Google Scholar
Appleby, PG, Oldfield, F. 1978. The calculation of 210Pb dates assuming a constant rate of supply of unsupported 210Pb to the sediment. Catena 5:1–8.Google Scholar
Appleby, PG, Oldfield, F. 1992. Application of 210Pb to sedimentation studies. In: Ivanovich, M, Harmon, RS, editors. Uranium-series disequilibrium: applications to earth, marine & environmental sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p 731–78.Google Scholar
Appleby, PG, Nolan, PJ, Gifford, DW, Godfrey, MJ, Oldfield, F, Anderson, NJ, Battarbee, RW. 1986. 210Pb dating by low background gamma counting. Hydrobiologia 141:21–27.Google Scholar
Appleby, PG, Richardson, N, Nolan, PJ. 1992. Self-absorption corrections for well-type germaniun detectors. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 71:228–33.Google Scholar
Appleby, PG, Shotyk, W, Fankhauser, A. 1997. 210Pb age dating of three peat cores in the Jura Mountains, Switzerland. Water Air and Soil Pollution 100 (3/4):223–31.Google Scholar
Arslanov, KA, Saveljeva, LA, Gey, NA, Klimanov, VA, Chernov, SB, Chernova, GM, Kuzmin, GF, Tertychnaya, TV, Subetto, DA, Denisenkov, VP. 1999. Chronology of vegetation and paleoclimatic stages of northwestern Russia during the late glacial and holocene. Radiocarbon 41(1):24–5.Google Scholar
Bennett, BB, De Geer, LE, Doury, A. 2000. Nuclear weapons test programmes of the different countries. In: Warner, F, Kirchmann, RJC, editors. Nuclear test explosions—environmental and human impacts. Chichester, New York, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p 13–32.Google Scholar
Benoit, JM, Fitzgerald, WF, Damman, AWH. 1998. The biogeochemistry of an ombrotrophic bog: evaluation of use as an archive of atmospheric mercury deposition. Environmental Research, Section A 78:118–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biester, H, Kilian, R, Hertel, C, Schöler, HF. 2000. Elevated mercury concentrations in southern Patagonian peat bogs—An anthropogenic signal? Oral presentation at the Silver Anniversary International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment in Ann Arbor, USA, 6–10 August 2000.Google Scholar
Boutron, CF, Vandal, GM, Fitzgerald, WF, Ferrari, CP. 1998. A 40-year record of mercury in central Greenland snow. Geophysical Research Letters 25(17):3315–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braune, B, Muir, D, Demarch, B, Gamberg, M, Poole, K, Currie, R, Dodd, M, Duschenko, W, Earner, J, Elkin, B, Evans, M, Grundy, S, Hebert, C, Johnstone, R, Kidd, K, Koenig, B, Lockhart, L, Marshall, H, Reimer, K, Sanderson, J, Shutt, L. 1999. Spatial and temporal trends of contaminants in Canadian Arctic freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Science of the Total Environment 230:145–207.Google Scholar
Cortizas, AM, Ponteedra Pomba, X, Garcia-Rodeja, E, Novoa Munoz, JC, Shotyk, W. 1999. Mercury in a Spanish peat bog: archive of climate change and atmospheric metal deposition. Science 284:939–42.Google Scholar
Dai, KM, Fan, CY. 1986. Bomb produced 14C content in tree rings grown at different latitudes. Radiocarbon 28(2A):346–9.Google Scholar
Dai, KM, Qian, Y, Fan, CY. 1992. Bomb-produced 14C in tree rings. Radiocarbon 34(3):753–6.Google Scholar
Ehhalt, DH. 1999. Gas Phase Chemistry of the Troposphere. In: Baumgärtel, H, Grünbein, W, Hensel, F, editors. Global aspects of atmospheric chemistry. Darmstadt: Steinkopff Verlag and New York: Springer Verlag. p 21–109.Google Scholar
Gedyé, SJ. 1998. Mass balance in recent peats. Unpublished PhD thesis, Liverpool University.Google Scholar
Goodsite, MG. 2000. Determination of heavy-metal deposition by correlation with 14-C. Thesis. The University of Southern Denmark, Odense University, Department of Chemistry, March 2000.Google Scholar
Jungner, H, Sonninen, E, Possnert, G, Tolonen, K. 1995. Use of bomb-produced 14C to evaluate the amount of CO2 emanating from two peat bogs in Finland. Radiocarbon 37(2):567–73.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Schoch-Fischer, H, Bruns, M, Münnich, M, Berdau, D, Vogel, JC, Münnich, KO. 1997. 14CO2 records from two sites in Central—Schauinsland & Vermunt. URL: <http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/trends/co2/cent.htm>..>Google Scholar
Levin, I, Hesshaimer, V. 2000. Radiocarbon—a unique tracer of global carbon cycle dynamics. Radiocarbon 42(1):69–80.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Schoch-Fischer, H, Bruns, M, Münnich, M, Berdau, D, Vogel, JC, Münnich, KO. 1985. 25 years of tropospheric 14C observations in Central Europe. Radiocarbon 27(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Murphy, JO, Lawson, EW, Fink, D, Hotchkis, MAC, Hua, Q, Jacobsen, GE, Smith, AM, Tuniz, C. 1997. 14C measurements of the bomb pulse in N- and S-hemisphere tropical trees. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B123:447–50.Google Scholar
Nydal, R, Lövseth, K. 1983. Tracing bomb 14C in the atmosphere 1962-1980. Journal of Geophysical Research 88 (C6):3621–42.Google Scholar
Nydal, R, Lövseth, K. 1996. Carbon-14 measurements in atmospheric CO2 from northern and southern hemisphere sites, 1962–1993. URL: <http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/epubs/ndp/ndp057/ndp057.htm>..>Google Scholar
Nydal, R, Gislefoss, JS. 1996. Further application of bomb 14C as a tracer in the atmosphere and ocean. Radiocarbon 38(3):389–406.Google Scholar
Olsson, IU. 1986. A study of errors in 14C dates of Peat and Sediment. Radiocarbon 28(2A):429–35.Google Scholar
Olsson, IU. 1989. Recent 14C activity in the atmosphere, “clean air” and the Chernobyl effect. Radiocarbon 31(3):740–6.Google Scholar
Olsson, IU, Possnert, G. 1992. 14C activity in different sections and chemical fractions of oak tree rings, AD 1938-1981. Radiocarbon 34(3):757–67.Google Scholar
Olsson, IU. 1993. A ten-year record of the different levels of the 14C activities over Sweden and the Arctic. Tellus 45B:479–81.Google Scholar
Pirrone, N, Allegrini, I, Keeler, GJ, Nriagu, J, Rossman, R, Robbins, JA. 1998. Historical atmospheric mercury emissions and depositions in North America compared to mercury accumulations in sedimentary records. Atmospheric Environment 32(5):929–40.Google Scholar
Puchegger, S, Rom, W, Steier, P. 2000. Automated Evaluation of 14C Measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172:274–80.Google Scholar
Rom, W. 2000. 14C Accelerator Mass Spectrometry - Applications in Archaeology, Biomedicine and in the Atmospheric Sciences. Thesis, University of Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Shore, JS, Bartley, DD, Harkness, DD. 1995. Problems encountered with the 14C dating of peat. Quaternary Science Reviews (Quaternary Geochronology) 14:373–83.Google Scholar
Shotyk, W, Weiss, D, Appleby, PG, Cheburkin, AK, Frei, R, Gloor, M, Kramers, JD, Reese, S, van der Knaap, WO. 1998. History of atmospheric lead deposition since 12,370 14C yr BP recorded in a peat bog profile, Jura Mountains, Switzerland. Science 281:1635–40.Google Scholar
Shotyk, W, Goodsite, ME, Lohse, C, Hansen, TS, Roos, F, Biester, H, Cheburkin, AK, Heinemeier, H, Appleby, PG, Reese, S. 2001. Continuous, 3000-year peat core records of Atmospheric Hg in Greenland and Denmark. Earth and Plantetary Science Letters. Submitted.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Quay, PD. 1981. Atmospheric 14C changes resulting from fossil fuel CO2 release and cosmic ray flux. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 53:349–62.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Beck, JW, Burr, GS, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, van der Plicht, J, Spurk, M. 1998. INTCAL98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24,000–0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40(3):1041–83. Data are available at URL: <http://depts.washington.edu/qil/datasets/intcal98_14c.txt>.Google Scholar
Tans, PP. 1981. A compilation of bomb 14C data for use in global carbon model calculations. In: Bolin, B, editor. SCOPE 16, Carbon cycle modelling. Chichester New York Brisbane Toronto; Wiley. p 131–57.Google Scholar
Tauber, H. 1967. Copenhagen radiocarbon measurements VIII—geographic variations in atmospheric C14 activity. Radiocarbon 9:246–56.Google Scholar
USNT. 2000. United States Nuclear Tests—July 1945 through September 1992. Report. DOE/NV—209-REV 15. United States Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office. Las Vegas, Nevada. URL: http://www.nv.doe.gov/news&pubs/publications/historyre-ports/pdfs/DOENV209_REV15.pdf.Google Scholar
Wardenaar, ECP. 1987. A new hand tool for cutting peat. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:1772–3.Google Scholar
White, JWC, Ciaia, P, Figge, RA, Kenny, R, Markgraf, V. 1994. A high resolution record of atmospheric CO2 content from carbon isotopes in peat. Nature 367:153–6.Google Scholar
Wrobel, S, Eckstein, D. 1992. Determining Time and Environment from Tree Rings. In: Hackens, T, Jungner, H, Carpelan, C, editors. PACT 36. Rixensart: PACT Belgium. p 33–49.Google Scholar