Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T01:35:04.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Preparation Methods in Radiocarbon Dating of Old Wood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2016

Irka Hajdas ,
Laura Hendriks ,
Alessandro Fontana  and
Giovanni Monegato
Irka Hajdas*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Laura Hendriks
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Alessandro Fontana
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Padua, Italy
Giovanni Monegato
Affiliation:
Institute of Geosciences and Earth Resources, CNR, Torino, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From the early days of radiocarbon dating, the standard sample treatment has involved removal of contamination from carbonates and humic acids by washes in acid and base, respectively. A modification of this acid-base-acid (ABA) method has been suggested, especially for material older than 20,000 yr. However, the criticism of ABA and application of a more aggressive oxidizing method, such as wet oxidation (ABOX) or cellulose extraction, might only be needed in some special cases, for example, in the case of poorly preserved or chemically treated wood. Separation of cellulose seems to be the ultimate solution; however, it is not always applicable when samples contain small amounts of wood. As a part of studies focusing on the chronology of late Pleistocene sedimentary processes in the Venetian–Friulian Plain and Carnic Alps (NE Italy), 14C analyses were performed on old wood samples found in sedimentary deposits of pre-Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) age. Wood samples were treated by five methods: ABA, two modified ABA treatments (ABOX and ABA+Bleach), as well as two different cellulose separations. Infrared spectra of treated samples and 14C results show that in most cases the ABA method is sufficient in removing the contamination of naturally deposited wood, even when the wood is of very old age.

Keywords

14C AMS datingwoodpretreatmentcelluloseIR spectra
Type
Chemical Pretreatment Approaches
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 59 , Special Issue 3: Proceedings of the 22nd International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 2 of 2) , June 2017 , pp. 727 - 737
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 2015 Radiocarbon Conference, Dakar, Senegal, 16–20 November 2015

References

REFERENCES

Anchukaitis, K, Evans, M, Lange, T, Smith, D, Leavitt, S, Schrag, D. 2008. Consequences of a rapid cellulose extraction technique for oxygen isotope and radiocarbon analyses. Analytical Chemistry 80(6):2035–2041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, JR, Libby, WF. 1949. Age determinations by radiocarbon content: checks with samples of known age. Science 110(2869):678–680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, MI, Ayliffe, LK, Fifield, LK, Turney, CSM, Cresswell, RG, Barrows, TT, David, B. 1999. Radiocarbon dating of “old” charcoal using a wet oxidation, stepped-combustion procedure. Radiocarbon 41(1):127–140.Google Scholar
Boettger, T, Haupt, M, Knoller, K, Weise, SM, Waterhouse, JS, Rinne, KT, Loader, NJ, Sonninen, E, Jungner, H, Masson-Delmotte, V, Stievenard, M, Guillemin, MT, Pierre, M, Pazdur, A, Leuenberger, M, Filot, M, Saurer, M, Reynolds, CE, Helle, G, Schleser, GH. 2007. Wood cellulose preparation methods and mass spectrometric analyses of δ13C, δ18O, and nonexchangeable δ2H values in cellulose, sugar, and starch: an interlaboratory comparison. Analytical Chemistry 79(12):4603–4612.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360.Google Scholar
Browning, BL. 1967. Methods of Wood Chemistry. Volumes I & II. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fontana, A, Mozzi, P, Bondesan, A. 2010. Late Pleistocene evolution of the Venetian–Friulian Plain. Rendiconti Lincei 21(S1):181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontana, A, Mozzi, P, Marchetti, M. 2014. Alluvial fans and megafans along the southern side of the Alps. Sedimentary Geology 301:150–171.Google Scholar
Gaudinski, J, Dawson, T, Quideau, S, Schuur, E, Roden, J, Trumbore, S, Sandquist, D, Oh, S, Wasylishen, R. 2005. Comparative analysis of cellulose preparation techniques for use with 13C, 14C, and 18O isotopic measurements. Analytical Chemistry 77(22):7212–7224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajdas, I. 2008. The radiocarbon dating method and its applications in Quaternary studies. Quaternary Science Journal - Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart 57:2–24.Google Scholar
Hajdas, I, Bonani, G, Thut, H, Leone, G, Pfenninger, R, Maden, C. 2004. A report on sample preparation at the ETH/PSI AMS facility in Zurich. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:267–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, K, Higgins, H, Michell, A. 1964. Infrared spectra of Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell. and Pinus radiata D. Don. Holzforschung-International Journal of the Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Technology of Wood 18:108–113.Google Scholar
Hendriks, L, Hajdas, I, McIntyre, C, Küffner, M, Scherrer, NC, Ferreira, ES. 2016. Microscale radiocarbon dating of paintings. Applied Physics A 122:167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, A, Turney, C, Palmer, J, Southon, J, Kromer, B, Bronk Ramsey, C, Boswijk, G, Fenwick, P, Noronha, A, Staff, R, Friedrich, M, Reynard, L, Guetter, D, Wacker, L, Jones, R. 2013. The New Zealand Kauri (Agathis Australis) Research Project: a radiocarbon dating intercomparison of Younger Dryas wood and implications for IntCal13. Radiocarbon 55(4):2035–2048.Google Scholar
Kromer, B, Lindauer, S, Synal, HA, Wacker, L. 2013. MAMS – a new AMS facility at the Curt-Engelhorn-Centre for Achaeometry, Mannheim, Germany. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loader, NJ, Robertson, I, Barker, AC, Switsur, VR, Waterhouse, JS. 1997. An improved technique for the batch processing of small wholewood samples to α-cellulose. Chemical Geology 136(3):313–317.Google Scholar
McCormac, FG, Hogg, AG, Higham, TFG, Baillie, MGL, Palmer, JG, Xiong, LM, Pilcher, JR, Brown, D, Hoper, ST. 1998. Variations of radiocarbon in tree rings: Southern Hemisphere offset preliminary results. Radiocarbon 40(3):1153–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monegato, G, Fontana, A. 2006. The Late-Pleistocene of Illegio hollow (Friuli, NE Italy): trees buried by landslide 34 ky, before the last glacial maximum advance in Tagliamento valley. In: Pini R, Ravazzi C, editors. Quaternary Stratigraphy and Evolution in the Alpine Region in the European and Global framework. INQUA-SEQS, 11–16 September 2006, Milan, Abstract volume, p 122–3.Google Scholar
Monegato, G, Ravazzi, C, Donegana, M, Pini, R, Calderoni, G, Wick, L. 2007. Evidence of a two-fold glacial advance during the last glacial maximum in the Tagliamento end moraine system (eastern Alps). Quaternary Research 68(2):284–302.Google Scholar
Nemec, M, Wacker, L, Hajdas, I, Gaggeler, H. 2010. Alternative methods for cellulose preparation for AMS measurement. Radiocarbon 52(3):1358–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinne, KT, Boettger, T, Loader, NJ, Robertson, I, Switsur, VR, Waterhouse, JS. 2005. On the purification of α-cellulose from resinous wood for stable isotope (H, C and O) analysis. Chemical Geology 222(1–2):75–82.Google Scholar
Santos, G, Bird, M, Pillans, B, Fifield, L, Alloway, B, Chappell, J, Hausladen, P, Arneth, A. 2001. Radiocarbon dating of wood using different pretreatment procedures: application to the chronology of Rotoehu Ash, New Zealand. Radiocarbon 43(2A):239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southon, JR, Magana, AL. 2010. A comparison of cellulose extraction and ABA pretreatment methods for AMS 14C dating of ancient wood. Radiocarbon 52(3):1371–1379.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Bonani, G, Friedrich, M, Hajdas, I, Kromer, B, Nemec, M, Ruff, M, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Vockenhuber, C. 2010a. MICADAS: routine and high-precision radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 52(2):252–262.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Nemec, M, Bourquin, J. 2010b. A revolutionary graphitisation system: fully automated, compact and simple. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):931–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar