Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:00:45.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of an Automatic Sampling Unit for Measuring Radiocarbon Content of Groundwater

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

R Janovics ,
M Molnár ,
I Futó ,
L Rinyu ,
É Svingor ,
M Veres ,
I Somogyi  and
I Barnabás
R Janovics*
Affiliation:
Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies, MTA ATOMKI, Debrecen, Hungary
M Molnár
Affiliation:
Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies, MTA ATOMKI, Debrecen, Hungary
I Futó
Affiliation:
Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies, MTA ATOMKI, Debrecen, Hungary
L Rinyu
Affiliation:
Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies, MTA ATOMKI, Debrecen, Hungary
É Svingor
Affiliation:
Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies, MTA ATOMKI, Debrecen, Hungary
M Veres
Affiliation:
Isotoptech Zrt, Debrecen, Hungary
I Somogyi
Affiliation:
Iontech Kft, Litér, Hungary
I Barnabás
Affiliation:
Public Agency for Radioactive Waste Management (PURAM) of Hungary, Budaörs, Hungary
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An automatic water sampling unit was developed to monitor the radioactive emission (radiocarbon and other corrosion and fission products) from nuclear facilities into the groundwater. Automatic sampling is based on the principal of ion exchange using built-in resin columns in the submerging samplers. In this way, even the short-term emissions can be detected. According to our experiments, the 14C activity concentrations and the δ13C values of the samples made by the ion exchange method are systematically underestimated compared to the real values. The carbonate adsorption feature of the sampling unit was studied under laboratory and field conditions. For this purpose, a test method was developed. The observed sampling efficiencies and additionally some carbon contamination for the sampling method itself have to be taken into consideration when we estimate the amount of 14C contamination introduced into the groundwater from a nuclear facility. Therefore, a correction factor should be made for the 14C anion exchange sampling. With the help of this correction, the results converge to the expected value.

Type
Freshwater and Groundwater
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 3: 20th Int. Radiocarbon Conference Proceedings , 2010 , pp. 1141 - 1149
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Csongor, É, Hertelendi, E. 1986. Low-level counting facility for 14C dating. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 17(5–6):493–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csongor, É, Szabó, I, Hertelendi, E. 1982. Preparation of counting gas of proportional counters for radiocarbon dating. Radiochemical and Radioanalytical Letters 55:303–7.Google Scholar
de Jonge, H, Rothenberg, G. 2005. New device and method for flux-proportional sampling of mobile solutes in soil and groundwater. Environmental Science & Technology 9(1):274–82.Google Scholar
Divine, CE, Madsen, LL, Andrews, SD, Santangelo-Dreiling, T. 2005. Passive diffusion ground water samplers at a site with heterogeneous hydrostratigraphy: pilot study results. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 25(1):90–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, DE. 1976. The application of borehole geophysics to the selection and monitoring of nuclear waste disposal sites. In: Proceedings of 17th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics. Snowbird, Utah, 25–27 August 1976. US National Committee for Rock Mechanics of the National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. p 4B-1–4B-3-7.Google Scholar
Granato, GE, Smith, KP. 1979. Robowell: an automated process for monitoring ground water quality using established sampling protocols. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 19(4):81–9.Google Scholar
Hart, RJ, Spruill, TB. 1988. Description and hydrogeologic evaluation of nine hazardous-waste sites in Kansas, 1984–86. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 88–4015.Google Scholar
Hertelendi, E. 1990. Developments of methods and equipment for isotope analytical purposes and their applications [CSc thesis]. Hungarian Academy of Sciences. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Hertelendi, E, Csongor, É, Záborszky, L, Molnár, J, Gál, J, Györffi, M, Nagy, S. 1989. A counter system for high-precision 14C dating. Radiocarbon 31(3):399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazardous Waste Bureau. 2001. Use of low-flow and other non-traditional sampling techniques for RCRA compliant groundwater monitoring. Position paper of Hazardous Waste Bureau of New Mexico Environment Department, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.Google Scholar
Jones, I, Lerner, DN, Baines, OP. 1999. Multiport sock samplers: a low-cost technology for effective multi-level ground water sampling. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 19(1):134–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, KE. 1993. A diffusive sampler for passive monitoring of volatile organic compounds in ground water. Ground Water 31(5):735–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, JA. 1993. Wastewater sampling. The National Environmental Journal 3(1):34–7.Google Scholar
Maucha, R. 1932. Hydrochemische Metoden in der Limnologie. Binnengewasser 12. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart. 173 p.Google Scholar
Mulsow, S, Coquery, M, Dovlete, C, Gastaud, J, Ikeuchi, Y, Pham, MK, Povinec, PP. 1999. Radionuclide concentrations in underground waters of Mururoa and Fangataufa atolls. Science of the Total Environment 237–238(1–3):287–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petruzzi, NM, Silliman, SE. 2006. A sampling device for collection of ground water bacteria under natural gradient flow conditions. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 26(1):85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronen, D, Graber, ER, Laor, Y. 1987. Volatile organic compounds in the saturated-unsaturated interface region of a contaminated phreatic aquifer. Vadose Zone Journal 4(2):337–44.Google Scholar
Spalding, BP, Watson, DB. 2007. Measurement of dissolved H2, O2, and CO2 in groundwater using passive samplers for gas chromatographic analyses. Environmental Science & Technology 41(1):7861–7.Google Scholar
Stow, SH, Haase, CS. 1986. Subsurface disposal of liquid low-level radioactive wastes at Oak Ridge, Tennessee. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Subsurface Injection of Liquid Wastes. Dublin, Ohio, USA: National Water Well Association. p 656–75.Google Scholar
Vrba, J. 1988. Groundwater quality monitoring as a tool of groundwater resources protection. In: Karst Hydrogeology and Karst Environment Protection. IAHS Publication 176, Volume 1. Wallingford: IAHS Press. p 88–97.Google Scholar