Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T14:31:25.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current Sample Preparation and Analytical Capabilities of the Radiocarbon Laboratory at CologneAMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2019

J Rethemeyer ,
M Gierga ,
S Heinze ,
A Stolz ,
A Wotte ,
P Wischhöfer ,
S Berg ,
JO Melchert  and
A Dewald
J Rethemeyer*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
M Gierga
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
S Heinze
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Physics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
A Stolz
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Physics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
A Wotte
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
P Wischhöfer
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
S Berg
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
JO Melchert
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
A Dewald
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Physics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work summarizes the methodical capabilities, improvements, and new developments in the radiocarbon laboratory of the accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) facility at the University of Cologne, Germany, which was established in 2010. During the past years, the laboratory has specialized in the analysis of small and gaseous samples. We thus, recently installed a second ion source dedicated for radiocarbon (14C) analysis of CO2 samples at our 6 MV Tandetron AMS from High Voltage Engineering Europe B.V. that is coupled with the gas injection system from Ionplus and an EuroVector EA 3000 elemental analyzer. This work summarizes all pretreatment methods and analytical facilities established in our laboratory during the last years including 14C analysis of individual organic compounds and of CO2 trapped on molecular sieves. We also report different blank values including our long-term blank since 2011, which is for normal-sized, solid samples (650–1000 µg C) 0.0012 ± 0.0004 F14C (54,305 ± 2581 yr BP, n = 484). The precision obtained for modern samples measured as graphite is 0.5% and for gaseous samples injected with the GIS ≤2%.

Keywords

AMS radiocarbonradiocarbon sample preparationstatus report
Type
Conference Paper
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 61 , Issue 5: Radiocarbon 2018 Conference Proceedings Trondheim, Norway, June 17–22, 2018 Part 1 of 2 , October 2019 , pp. 1449 - 1460
Copyright
© 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 23rd International Radiocarbon Conference, Trondheim, Norway, 17–22 June, 2018

References

REFERENCES

Ascough, PL, Bird, MI, Francis, SM, Lebl, T. 2011. Alkali extraction of archaeological and geological charcoal: evidence for diagenetic degradation and formation of humic acids. Journal of Archaeological Science 38(1):69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ascough, PL, Bird, MI, Meredith, W, Wood, RE, Snape, CE, Brock, F, Higham, TFG, Large, DJ, Apperley, DC. 2010. Hydropyrolysis: implications for radiocarbon pretreatment and characterization of black carbon. Radiocarbon 52(2):1336–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beverly, RK, Beaumont, W, Tauz, D, Ormsby, KM, von Reden, KF, Santos, GM, Southon, JR. 2010. The Keck Carbon Cycle AMS Laboratory, University of California, Irvine: status report. Radiocarbon 52(2):301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, F, Wood, R, Higham, TFG, Ditchfield, P, Bayliss, A, Ramsey, CB. 2012. Reliability of nitrogen content (%N) and carbon: nitrogen atomic ratios (C:N) as indicators of collagen preservation suitable for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 54(3–4):879–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewald, A, Heinze, S, Jolie, J, Zilges, A, Dunai, T, Rethemeyer, J, Melles, M, Staubwasser, M, Kuczewski, B, Richter, J, et al. 2013. CologneAMS, a dedicated center for accelerator mass spectrometry in Germany. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, PMJ, Pagani, M, Eglinton, TI, Brenner, M, Hodell, DA, Curtis, JH, Ma, KF, Breckenridge, A. 2014. Pre-aged plant waxes in tropical lake sediments and their influence on the chronology of molecular paleoclimate proxy records. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 141:346–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eglinton, TI, Aluwihare, LI, Bauer, JE, Druffel, ERM, McNichol, AP. 1996. Gas chromatographic isolation of individual compounds from complex matrices for radiocarbon dating. Analytical Chemistry 68(5):904–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fülöp, R-H, Heinze, S, John, S, Rethemeyer, J. 2013. Ultrafiltration of bone samples is neither the problem nor the solution. Radiocarbon 55(2):491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galy, V, Eglinton, T. 2011. Protracted storage of biospheric carbon in the Ganges–Brahmaputra basin. Nature Geoscience 4(12):843–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierga, M, Hajdas, I, van Raden, UJ, Gilli, A, Wacker, L, Sturm, M, Bernasconi, SM, Smittenberg, RH. 2016. Long-stored soil carbon released by prehistoric land use: evidence from compound-specific radiocarbon analysis on Soppensee lake sediments. Quaternary Science Reviews 144:123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, C-D, Smith, JA, Kuhn, G, Esper, O, Gersonde, R, Larter, RD, Maher, B, Moreton, SG, Shimmield, TM, Korte, M. 2009. Age assignment of a diatomaceous ooze deposited in the western Amundsen Sea Embayment after the Last Glacial Maximum. Journal of Quaternary Science 25(3):280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Klinken, GJ. 1999. Bone collagen quality indicators for palaeodietary and radiocarbon measurements. Journal of Archaeological Science 26(6):687–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, J, Kleber, M. 2015. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528:60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melchert, JO, Stolz, A, Dewald, A, Gierga, M, Wischhöfer, P, Rethemeyer, J. Submitted. Exploring sample size limits of AMS gas ion source 14C analysis at CologneAMS. Submitted to Radiocarbon.Google Scholar
Němec, M, Wacker, L, Gäggeler, H. 2010. Optimization of the graphitization process at age-1. Radiocarbon 52(3):1380–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pessenda, LCR, Gouveia, SEM, Aravena, R. 2001. Radiocarbon dating of total soil organic matter and humin fraction and its comparison with 14C ages of fossil charcoal. Radiocarbon 43(2B):595–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rethemeyer, J, Fülöp, RH, Höfle, S, Wacker, L, Heinze, S, Hajdas, I, Patt, U, König, S, Stapper, B, Dewald, A. 2013. Status report on sample preparation facilities for 14C analysis at the new CologneAMS center. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, GM, Moore, RB, Southon, JR, Griffin, S, Hinger, E, Zhang, D. 2007a. AMS 14C sample preparation at the KCCAMS/UCI facility: status report and performance of small samples. Radiocarbon 49(2):255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, GM, Southon, JR, Griffin, S, Beaupre, SR, Druffel, ERM. 2007b. Ultra small-mass AMS 14C sample preparation and analyses at KCCAMS/UCI Facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, GM, Xu, X. 2017. Bag of tricks: a set of techniques and other resources to help 14C laboratory setup, sample processing, and beyond. Radiocarbon 59(3):785–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Naysmith, P, Cook, GT. 2017. Should archaeologists care about 14C intercomparisons? Why? A summary report on SIRI. Radiocarbon 59(5):1589–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, A, Dewald, A, Altenkirch, R, Herb, S, Heinze, S, Schier, M, Feuerstein, K, Müller-Gatermann, C, Wotte, A, Rethemeyer, J, Dunai, T. 2017. Radiocarbon measurement of small gaseous samples at CologneAMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 406:283–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, A, Dewald, A, Heinze, S, Altenkirch, R, Hackenberg, G, Herb, S, Müller-Gatermann, C, Schiffer, M, Zitzer, G, Wotte, A, Rethemeyer, J, Dunai, T. 2019. Improvements in the measurement of small 14CO2 samples at CologneAMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 439:70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Fülöp, R-H, Hajdas, I, Molnár, M, Rethemeyer, J. 2013. A novel approach to process carbonate samples for radiocarbon measurements with helium carrier gas. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Němec, M, Bourquin, J. 2010. A revolutionary graphitisation system: fully automated, compact and simple. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):931–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wotte, A, Wischhöfer, P, Wacker, L, Rethemeyer, J. 2017b. 14CO2 analysis of soil gas: Evaluation of sample size limits and sampling devices. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 413:51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wotte, A, Wordell-Dietrich, P, Wacker, L, Don, A, Rethemeyer, J. 2017a. 14CO2 processing using an improved and robust molecular sieve cartridge. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 400:65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziolkowski, LA, Druffel, ERM. 2009. Quantification of extraneous carbon during compound specific radiocarbon analysis of black carbon. Analytical Chemistry 81(24):10156–10161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed