Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T11:23:09.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of 14C Collected by Precipitation and Gas-Strip Methods for Dating Groundwater

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

Kotaro Nakata ,
Takuma Hasegawa ,
Teruki Iwatsuki  and
Toshihiro Kato
Kotaro Nakata*
Affiliation:
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Backend Research Center, Abiko Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 1646 Abiko, Abiko-shi, Chiba-ken 270-1194, Japan.
Takuma Hasegawa
Affiliation:
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Backend Research Center, Abiko Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 1646 Abiko, Abiko-shi, Chiba-ken 270-1194, Japan.
Teruki Iwatsuki
Affiliation:
Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 1-64, Yamanouchi, Akeyo, Mizunami, Gifu, 509-6132, Japan.
Toshihiro Kato
Affiliation:
Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 1-64, Yamanouchi, Akeyo, Mizunami, Gifu, 509-6132, Japan.
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) in groundwater is used to estimate the residence time based on radiocarbon concentration. DIC is usually extracted by a gas-strip or precipitation (SrCO3 or BaCO3) method. In this study, the gas-strip and precipitation methods of DIC were applied to both artificially prepared NaHCO3 solutions and natural groundwater to estimate the certainty of the two methods for 14C dating. 14C values obtained by the gas-strip method for NaHCO3 solutions with distinct salinity, DIC, and 14C concentrations were close to the theoretically predicted 14C value based on the 14C value of NaHCO3 powder. Conversely, the 14C value obtained by the precipitation method always showed higher values than the predicted values. The difference in 14C value between the gas-strip and precipitation methods was assumed to be caused by the contamination of modern carbon in the NaOH solution used in the precipitation method. The contamination of modern carbon derived from the NaOH solution during precipitation was found to range from less than 1 mg/L to about 1 mg/L. The applicability of the precipitation method for groundwater should be considered carefully according to the DIC, 14C concentration of groundwater, and purpose of the study being conducted.

Keywords

groundwaterdissolved inorganic carbonprecipitationgas strip
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 491 - 503
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aggarwal, PK, Araguas-Araguas, L, Choudhry, M, van Duren, M, Froehlich, K. 2014. Lower groundwater 14C age by atmospheric CO2 uptake during sampling and analysis. Groundwater 52(1):20–24.Google Scholar
Atekwana, EA, Krishnamurthy, RV. 1998. Seasonal variations of dissolved inorganic carbon and δ13C of surface waters: application of a modified gas evolution technique. Journal of Hydrology 205(3–4):265–278.Google Scholar
Clark, I, Fritz, P. 1997. Age and dating old groundwater. Chapter 8. In: Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology. New York: Lewis Publishers. p 197–243.Google Scholar
Corcho Alvarado, JA, Paces, T, Purtschert, R. 2013. Dating groundwater in the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin: understanding tracer variations in the subsurface. Applied Geochemistry 29:189–198.Google Scholar
Dorsett, A, Cherrier, J, Martin, JB, Cable, JE. 2011. Assessing hydrologic and biogeochemical controls on pore-water dissolved inorganic carbon cycling in a subterranean estuary: a 14C and 13C mass balance approach. Marine Chemistry 127(1–4):76–89.Google Scholar
Dulinski, M, Rozanski, K, Kuc, T, Gorczyca, Z, Kania, J, Kapusta, M. 2013. Evolution of radiocarbon in a sandy aquifer across large temporal and spatial scales: case study from southern Poland. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):905–919.Google Scholar
Geyh, MA. 2000. An overview of 14C analysis in the study of groundwater. Radiocarbon 42(1):99–114.Google Scholar
Iwatsuki, T, Xu, S, Itoh, S, Abe, M, Watanabe, M. 2000. Estimation of relative groundwater age in the granite at the Tono research site, central Japan. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):524–529.Google Scholar
Iwatsuki, T, Furue, R, Mie, H, Ioka, S, Mizuno, T. 2005. Hydrochemical baseline condition of groundwater at the Mizunami underground research laboratory (MIU). Applied Geochemistry 20(12):2283–2302.Google Scholar
Iwatsuki, T, Hagiwara, H, Ohmori, K, Munemoto, T, Onoe, H. 2015. Hydrochemical disturbances measured in groundwater during the construction and operation of a large-scale underground facility in deep crystalline rock in Japan. Environmental Earth Science 74(4):3041–3057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalin, RM. 2000. Radiocarbon Dating of Groundwater Systems. Chapter 4. In: Cook PG, Herczeg AL, editors. Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 111–144.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Hammer, S. 2013. Atmospheric 14CO2 trend in western European background air from 2000 to 2012. Tellus B 65:20092.Google Scholar
Minami, M, Takahashi, HA. 2015. Radiocarbon analysis of water samples by the precipitation method. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Geochemical Society Japan. p 329. In Japanese.Google Scholar
Mook, WG, van der Plicht, J. 1999. Reporting 14C activities and concentrations. Radiocarbon 41(3):227–239.Google Scholar
Stewart, MK. 2012. A 40-year record of carbon-14 and tritium in the Christchurch groundwater system, New Zealand: dating of young samples with carbon-14. Journal of Hydrology 430–431:50–68.Google Scholar
Sültenfuß, J, Purtschert, R, Führböter, JF. 2011. Age structure and recharge conditions of a coastal aquifer (northern Germany) investigated with 39Ar, 14C, 3H, He isotopes and Ne. Hydrogeology Journal 19(1):221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, CB. 2004. Time-dependent factors inherent in the age equation for determining residence times of groundwater using 14C: a procedure to compensate for the past variability of 14C in atmospheric carbon dioxide, with application to the Wairau deep aquifer, Marlborough, New Zealand. Radiocarbon 46(2):501–515.Google Scholar