Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:23:18.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coastal Response to Changes in Sea Level Since the Last 4500 BP On the East Coast of Tamil Nadu, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Hema Achyuthan
Affiliation:
Centre for Geoscience and Engineering, Anna University, Tamil Nadu, India. Email: [email protected].
V R Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Geomorphology, clay mineral composition, and radiocarbon dates from Muttukadu to Marakkanam estuaries and the tidal zone along the east coast of Tamil Nadu, India, have been used to reconstruct coastal evolution between approximately 4500 and 1100 B P. Formation of alternate oyster beds with intervening tidal clay units indicate fluctuation in the sea level may be a consequence of changes in the Mid-Holocene sedimentation pattern and coastal configuration. 14C dates from Muttukadu indicate a rapid relative sea-level rise (RSL) subsequent to 3500 BP and tidal flat sedimentation between 3475 and 3145 BP. Marine conditions along the east coast area returned around 1900 B P. Comparison of dates with other sites, e.g. Muttukadu, Mammallapuram, and Marakkanam, points toward short removal of marine conditions, ample sediment supplies in the tidal zones, and neotectonic activity. Reactivation of the north–south trending fault line occurred not earlier than approximately 1050 B P. Our study indicates that Middle to Late Holocene coastal sedimentation and the chronology of the tidal zone formation have been strongly influenced by local factors. These have provided considerable scope for internal reorganization with changing coastal processes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Achyuthan, H. 1997. Age and formation of oyster beds of Muthukadu tidal flat zone, Tamil Nadu. Current Science 73(50):450–3.Google Scholar
Badve, RM, Rajsekhar, C, Kumaran, KPN, Kamble, V V. 1997. On the age and fauna of beachrock of Kegaon Coast, Uran, Maharashtra. Current Science 72:168–70.Google Scholar
Belknap, DF, Shipp, RC, Stuckenrath, R, Kelley, JT, Borns, HW Jr. 1989. Holocene sea level change in Maine. Bulletin of Maine Geological Survey 40:85105.Google Scholar
Katupotha, JJ. 1994. Geological significance of marine molluskan beds: evidence from southern coastal zone of Sri Lanka. Journal of National Science Council, Sri Lanka 22(2):157–87.Google Scholar
Kusumgar, S, Raj, R, Chamyal, LS, Yadav, GN. 1998. Holocene palaeoenvironmental changes in the Mahi river basin, Gujarat, Western India. Radiocarbon 40(2): 819–23.Google Scholar
Nigam, R, Khare, N. 1994. Effect of river discharge on the morphology of the benthic formainiferal test. Journal of the Geological Society of India 43:457–63.Google Scholar
Phleger, FB. 1960. Ecology and distribution of recent foraminifera. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Raj, R, Chamyal, LS. 1998. Microfauna from a middle Holocene terrace, lower Mahi valley, western India. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 43: 5971.Google Scholar
Rao, RN, Khare, N, Periakali, P. 1999. A note on Glandulina spinata Cushman – a rare foraminifer species from inner shelf sediments of Bay of Bengal, off Karikkattukuppam, near Chennai, Southeast coast of India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 54: 309–13.Google Scholar
Reineck, H-E, Singh, IB. 1980. Depositional sedimentary environments. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Braziunas, TF. 1993. 14C ages of marine samples to 10,000 BC. Radiocarbon 35(1):137–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaz, GG. 2000. Age of relict coral reef from the continental shelf off Karaikal, Bay of Bengal: evidence of last glacial maximum. Current Science 79:228–30.Google Scholar