Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:41:00.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carbon Isotopes as Tracers of Organic and Inorganic Carbon in Baltic Sea Sediments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2018

G Lujanienė ,
H-C Li ,
J Mažeika ,
R Paškauskas ,
N Remeikaitė-Nikienė ,
G Garnaga-Budrė ,
L Levinskaitė ,
K Jokšas ,
D Bugailiškytė  and
S Šemčuk
...Show all authors
G Lujanienė*
Affiliation:
SRI Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Vilnius, Lithuania
H-C Li
Affiliation:
NTUAMS Laboratory at National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
J Mažeika
Affiliation:
SRI Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania
R Paškauskas
Affiliation:
SRI Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania
N Remeikaitė-Nikienė
Affiliation:
SRI Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Vilnius, Lithuania EPA, Department of Marine Research, Klaipeda, Lithuania
G Garnaga-Budrė
Affiliation:
EPA, Department of Marine Research, Klaipeda, Lithuania
L Levinskaitė
Affiliation:
SRI Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania
K Jokšas
Affiliation:
SRI Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania Vilnius University, Faculty of Chemistry and Geosciences, Vilnius, Lithuania
D Bugailiškytė
Affiliation:
SRI Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Vilnius, Lithuania
S Šemčuk
Affiliation:
SRI Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Vilnius, Lithuania
A Kačergius
Affiliation:
Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Vokė Branch, Vilnius, Lithuania
A Stankevičius
Affiliation:
Marine Research Institute, Klaipėda University, Klaipėda, Lithuania
V Stirbys
Affiliation:
Marine Research Institute, Klaipėda University, Klaipėda, Lithuania
P P Povinec
Affiliation:
Comenius University, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Bratislava, Slovakia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Distributions of Δ14CTOC studied in bottom sediments collected during 2011–2016 in the Curonian Lagoon and in the open Baltic Sea indicated wide variations of Δ14CTOC values. Laboratory experiments on differential carbon utilization by Pseudomonas putida isolated from bottom sediments were carried out for better understanding of impacts of different sources on Δ14CTOC variations. Preferential glucose uptake (up to 80%) as a carbon source and a rather low (2–10%) inorganic carbon incorporation was found in media with diesel fuel. Pseudomonas putida a specific biomarker analyzed in biomass cultivated on the media with different carbon sources has been used to characterize microbial communities responsible for degradation of organic substances in bottom sediments. Large 14C depletions observed in sediments collected in the Gotland Deep of the Baltic Sea may indicate leakage from dumped chemical weapons.

Keywords

Δ14CTOCBaltic Sea sedimentscarbon sourcesPseudomonas putida
Type
Water, Sediment, Karst
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 60 , Special Issue 5: 2nd Radiocarbon in the Environment Conference, Debrecen, Hungary, July 3–7, 2017 Part 2 of 2 and Radiocarbon & Diet 2 International Conference Aarhus, Denmark, June 20–23, 2017 , October 2018 , pp. 1493 - 1505
Copyright
© 2018 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 2nd Radiocarbon in the Environment Conference, Debrecen, Hungary, 3–7 July 2017

References

Alonge, OO. 2016. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of Pseudomonas putida in the bioremediation of diesel fuel contaminated derno-podzoluivisolic soil of differenthorizonts. GJ Pure Appl Sci. 22:129–133.Google Scholar
Brooijmans, RJW, Pastink, MI, Siezen, RJ. 2009. Hydrocarbon – degrading bacteria: the oil-spill clean-up crew. MicrobBiotechnol. 2(6):587–594.Google Scholar
Deutsch, B, Alling, V, Humborg, C, Korth, F, Mörth, CM. 2012. Tracing inputs of terrestrial high molecular weight dissolved organic matter within the Baltic Sea ecosystem. Biogeosciences 9:4465–4475.Google Scholar
Druffel, ERM, Bauer, JE. 2000. Radiocarbon distributions in Southern Ocean dissolved and particulate organic matter. Geophysical Research Letters 27(10):1495–1498.Google Scholar
Garnaga, G, Wyse, E, Azemard, S, Stankevičius, A, de Mora, S. 2006. Arsenic in sediments from the southeastern Baltic Sea. Environmental Pollution (144):855–861.Google Scholar
Gašparovič, B,Godrijan, J, Frka, S, Tomažic, I, Penezic, A, Maric, D, Djakovac, T, Ivančic, I, Paliaga, P, Lyons, D, Precali, R, Tepic, N. 2013. Adaptation of marine plankton to environmental stress by glycolipid accumulation. Marine Environmental Research 92:120–132.Google Scholar
Hongoh, Y, Ohkuma, M, Kudo, T. 2003. Molecular analysis of bacterial microbiota in the gut of the termite Reticulitermessperatus (Isoptera; Rhinotermitidae). FEMS MicrobiolEcol 44(2):231–242.Google Scholar
Franke, Z. 1973. Chemistry of Warfare Agents. Chimija. p 136. In Russian.Google Scholar
James, RH, Bousquet, Ph, Bussmann, I, Haeckel, M, Kipfer, R, Leifer, I, Niemann, H, Ostrovsky, I, Piskozub, J, Rehder, G, Treude, T, Vielstadte, L, Greinert, J. 2016. Effects of climate change on methane emissions from seafloor sediments in the Arctic Ocean: A review. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61:S283–S299.Google Scholar
Keaveney, EM, Reimer, PJ, Foy, RH. 2015. Young, old, and weathered carbon—Part 2: using radiocarbon and stable isotopes to identify terrestrial carbon support of the food web in an alkaline, humic lake. Radiocarbon 57(3):425–438.Google Scholar
Logue, JB, Stedmon, CA, Kellerman, AM, Nielsen, NJ, Andersson, AF, Laudon, H, Lindström, ES, Kritzberg, ES. 2016. Experimental insights into the importance of aquatic bacterial community composition to the degradation of dissolved organic matter. The ISME Journal 10:533–545.Google Scholar
Lujanienė, G, Mažeika, J, Li, HC, Petrošius, R, Barisevičiūtė, R, Jokšas, K, Remeikaitė-Nikienė, N, Malejevas, V, Garnaga-Budrė, G, Stankevičius, A, Kulakauskaitė, I, Povinec, PP. 2015. Δ14C and δ13C variations in organic fractions of Baltic Sea sediments. Radiocarbon 57(3):479–490.Google Scholar
Lujanienė, G et al. 2017. Carbon and Pu isotopes in Baltic Sea sediments. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 126:40–53.Google Scholar
Marchesi, JR, Sato, T, Weightman, AJ, Martin, TA, Fry, JC, Hiom, SJ, Wade, WG. 1998. Design and evaluation of useful bacterium-specific PCR primers that amplify genes coding for bacterial 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 64:795–799.Google Scholar
Medvedeva, N, Polyak, Y, Kankaanpää, H, Zaytseva, T. 2009. Microbial responses to mustard gas dumped in the Baltic Sea. Mar Environ Res 68(2):71–81.Google Scholar
Mollenhauer, G, Rethemeyer, J. 2009. Compound-specific radiocarbon analysis – analytical challenges and applications. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 5:012006.Google Scholar
Mills, ChT, Slater, GF, Dias, RF, Carr, SA, Reddy, ChM, Schmidt, R, Mandernack, KW. 2013. The relative contribution of methanotrophs to microbial communities and carbon cycling in soil overlying a coal-bed methane seepage. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 84:474–494.Google Scholar
Pacwa-Płociniczak, M, Płaza, GA, Piotrowska-Seget, Z, Cameotra, SS. 2011. Environmental applications of biosurfactants: recent advances. Int J Mol Sci.12(1):633–654.Google Scholar
Pernet, F, Pelletier, CJ, Milley, J. 2006 Comparison of three solid-phase extraction methods for fatty acid analysis of lipid fractions in tissues of marine bivalves. J Chromatogr A. 1137(2):127–137.Google Scholar
Pinkart, HC, White, DC. 1998. Lipids of Pseudomonas. In: Montie TC, editors. Pseudomonas. Biotechnology Handbooks. Vol. 10. Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
Rinnan, R, Bååth, E. 2009. Differential utilization of carbon substrates by bacteria and fungi in tundra soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75(11):3611–3620.Google Scholar
Seifert, A-G, Trumbore, S, Xu, X, Zhang, D, Kothe, E, Gleixner, G. 2011. Variable effects of labile carbon on the carbon use of different microbial groups in black slate degradation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 75:2557–2570.Google Scholar
Shaw, N. 1970. Bacterial glycolipids. Bacteriological reviews 34(4):365–377.Google Scholar
Simkus, DN, Slater, GF, Lollar, B Sh, Wilkie, K, Kieft, ThL, Magnabosco, C, Lau, MCY, Pullin, MJ, Hendrickson, SB, Wommack, KE, Sakowski, EG, van Heerden, E, Kuloyo, O, Linage, B, Borgonie, G, Onstott, TC. 2016. Variations in microbial carbon sources and cycling in the deep continental subsurface. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 173:264–283.Google Scholar
Szczepańska, A, Zaborska, A, Maciejewska, A, Kuliński, K, Pempkowiak, J. 2012. Distribution and origin of organic matter in the Baltic Sea sediments dated with 210Pb and 137Cs. Geochronometria 39(1):1–9.Google Scholar
Tiwari, SC, Sureshkumar Singh, S, Dkhar, MS, Schloter, M, Gattinger, A. 2011. Microbial community structures of degraded and undegraded humid tropical forest soils as measured by phospholipid fatty acid [PLFA] profiles. Journal of Biodiversity and Ecological Sciences 1(3):197–212.Google Scholar
Uchida, M, Shibata, Y, Kawamura, K, Kumamoto, Y, Yoneda, M, Ohkushi, N, Harada, M, Hirota, M, Mukai, , Tanaka, A, Kusakabe, M, Morita, M. 2001. Compound-specific radiocarbon ages of fatty acids in marine sediments from the Western North Pacific. Radiocarbon 43(2B):949–956.Google Scholar
Wakeham, SG, McNichol, AP, Kostka, JE, Pease, TK. 2006. Natural-abundance radiocarbon as a tracer of assimilation of petroleum carbon by bacteria in salt marsh sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70:1761–1771.Google Scholar
Xu, X, Trumbore, SE, Zheng, S, Southon, JR, McDuffee, KE, Luttgen, M, Liu, JC. 2007. Modifying a sealed tube zinc reduction method for preparation of AMS graphite targets: reducing background and attaining high precision. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):320–329.Google Scholar
Zelles, L. 1999. Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterisation of microbial communities in soil: a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 29(2):111–129.Google Scholar