Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:39:37.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bridging the Gaps in Tree-Ring Records: Creating a High-Resolution Dendrochronological Network for Southeastern Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Tomasz Ważny ,
Brita Lorentzen ,
Nesibe Köse ,
Ünal Akkemik ,
Yurij Boltryk ,
Tuncay Güner ,
Josef Kyncl ,
Tomaš Kyncl ,
Constantin Nechita  and
Severin Sagaydak
...Show all authors
Tomasz Ważny*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, 1215 E. Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Institute for the Study, Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. Sienkiewicza 30/32, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
Brita Lorentzen
Affiliation:
Cornell Tree-Ring Laboratory, Cornell University, B-48 Goldwin Smith Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Nesibe Köse
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University, 34473 Bahçeköy, Istanbul, Turkey
Ünal Akkemik
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University, 34473 Bahçeköy, Istanbul, Turkey
Yurij Boltryk
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Pr. Geroyiw Stalingrada 12, 04210 Kiev, Ukraine
Tuncay Güner
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University, 34473 Bahçeköy, Istanbul, Turkey
Josef Kyncl
Affiliation:
DendroLab Brno, Eliasova 37, CZ-61600, Brno, Czech Republic
Tomaš Kyncl
Affiliation:
DendroLab Brno, Eliasova 37, CZ-61600, Brno, Czech Republic
Constantin Nechita
Affiliation:
Forest Research and Management Institute, Campulung Moldovenesc, Calea Bucovinei 73bis, RO 725100, Romania
Severin Sagaydak
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Pr. Geroyiw Stalingrada 12, 04210 Kiev, Ukraine
Jeni Kamenova Vasileva
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Sofia University, Tsar Osvoboditel 15, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Corresponding author: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dendrochronological research in North-Central Europe and the East Mediterranean has produced networks of long regional oak (Quercus sp.) reference chronologies that have been instrumental in dating, provenancing, and paleoclimate research applications. However, until now these two important tree-ring networks have not been successfully linked. Oak forests and historical/archaeological sites in southeastern Europe provide the key for linking the North-Central European and East Mediterranean tree-ring networks, but previous dendrochronological research in this region has been largely absent. This article presents the initial results of a project, in which we have built oak tree-ring chronologies from forest sites and historical/archaeological sites along a north-south transect between Poland and northwestern Turkey, with the aim of linking the North-Central European and East Mediterranean tree-ring networks and creating a new pan-European oak data set for dendrochronological dating and paleoclimatic reconstruction. Correlation among tree-ring chronologies and the spatial distribution of their teleconnections are evaluated. The southeastern European chronologies provide a solid bridge between both major European dendrochronological networks. The results indicate that a dense network of chronologies is the key for bridging spatial and temporal gaps in tree-ring records. Dendrochronological sampling should be intensively continued in southeastern Europe because resources for building long oak chronologies in the region are rapidly disappearing.

Keywords

dendrochronologyQuercus sp., teleconnectionsoutheastern Europetree rings
Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , 2014 , pp. S39 - S50
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Akkemik, Ü., Dağdeviren, N., and Aras, A., 2005. A preliminary reconstruction (AD 1635–2000) of spring precipitation using oak tree-rings in the western Black Sea region of Turkey. International Journal Biometeorology 49(5):297–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baillie, M. G. L., 1982. Tree-Ring Dating and Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Baillie, M. G. L., 1983. Is there a single British Isles oak tree-ring signal? In Proceedings of the 22nd Symposium on Archaeometry, April, 1982, edited by Aspinall, A., and Warren, S. E.; pp. 73–82. University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.Google Scholar
Baillie, M. G. L., and Pilcher, J. R., 1973. A simple crossdating program for tree-ring research. Tree-Ring Bulletin 33:7–14.Google Scholar
Bernabei, M., and Bontadi, J., 2012. Dendrochronological analysis of the timber structure of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. Journal of Cultural Heritage 13(4) supplement:e54–e60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielec-Bakowska, Z., 2010. A classification of deep cyclones over Poland (1971–2000). Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35(9–12):491–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilyayeva, S., Fialko, O., Turner, A., and Ważny, T., 2010. Historical-archaeological investigations at Akkerman (Bilhorod-Dnistrovsky) fortress, Ukraine. Anatolian Archaeology 16:7–8.Google Scholar
Billamboz, A., 2003. Tree rings and wetland occupation in Southwest Germany between 2000 and 500 BC: Dendroarchaeology beyond dating in tribute to F. H. Schweingruber. Tree-Ring Research 59(1):37–49.Google Scholar
Björkman, L., Feurdean, A., and Wohlfarth, B., 2003. Late-Glacial and Holocene forest dynamics at Stereogoiu in the Gutaiului Mountains, Northwest Romania. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 124(1–2):79–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodnariuc, A., Bouchette, A., Dedoubat, J. J., Otto, T., Fontugne, M., and Jalut, G., 2002. Holocene vegetational history of the Apuseni mountains, central Romania. Quaternary Science Reviews 21(12–13):1465–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bojariu, R., and Giorgi, F., 2005. The North Atlantic Oscillation signal in a regional climate simulation for the European region. Tellus A 57(4):641–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonde, N., Tyers, I., and Ważny, T., 1997. Where does the timber come from? Dendrochronological evidence of timber trade in Northern Europe 14th to 17th century. In Archaeological Science 1995, edited by Sinclair, A., Slater, E., Gowlett, J.; pp. 201–204. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brewer, S., Cheddadi, R., De Beaulieu, J. L., and Reille, M., 2002. The spread of deciduous Quercus throughout Europe since the last glacial period. Forest Ecology and Management 156(1–3):27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büntgen, U., Tegel, W., Nicolussi, K., McCormick, M., Frank, D., Trouet, V., Kaplan, J. O., Herzig, F., Heußner, K. U., Wanner, H., Luterbacher, J., and Esper, J., 2011. 2500 years of European climate variability and human susceptibility. Science 331(6017):578–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cedro, A., 2007. Tree-ring chronologies of downy oak (Quercus pubescens), pedunculate oak (Q. robur) and sessile oak (Q. petraea) in the Bielinek Nature Reserve: Comparison of the climatic determinants of tree-ring width. Geochronometria 26:39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Čufar, K., de Luis, M., Zupančič, M., and Eckstein, D., 2008. A 548-year long tree-ring chronology of oak (Quercus spp.) for southeast Slovenia and its significance as dating tool and climate archive. Tree-Ring Research 64(1):3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dering, M., Lewandowski, A., Ufnalski, K., and Kędzierska, A., 2008. How far to the east was the migration of white oaks from the Iberian refugium? Silva Fennica 42(3):327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducousso, A., and Bordacs, S., 2004. EUFORGEN. Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for pedunculate and sessile oaks (Quercus robur and Q. petraea). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome; 6 pp.Google Scholar
Eckstein, D., and Bauch, J., 1969. Beitrag zur Rationalisierung eines dendrochronologischen Verfahrens und zur Analyse seiner Aussagesicherheit. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 88(4):230–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, D., and Wrobel, S., 2007. Dendrochronological proof of origin of historic timber – retrospect and perspectives. In Volume 5: Proceedings of the Symposium of Tree Rings in Archaeology, Climatology and Ecology, edited by Haneca, K., Verheyden, A., Beeckmann, H., Gärtner, H., Helle, G., Schleser, G., Tervuren, G.; pp. 8–20. Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich, Umwelt/Environment 74.Google Scholar
Eckstein, D., Schwab, F., and Zimmermann, W. H., 1979. Aufbau und Anwendung einer Jahrringchronologie im niedersächsischen Küstenraum. Probleme der Küstenforschung im südlichen Nordseegebiet 13:99–121.Google Scholar
Eckstein, D., Ważny, T., Bauch, J., and Klein, P., 1986. New evidence for the dendrochronological dating of Netherlandish paintings. Nature 320(6061):465–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggertson, O., and Babos, A., 2002. Dendrochronological dating in Maramureş. with special emphases on objects from the Maramureş Museum in Sighetul Marmaţiei, Romania. Tradiţii şi patrimoniu 2–3:40–49.Google Scholar
Friedrich, M., Remmele, S., Kromer, B., Hoffmann, J., Spurk, M., Kaiser, K. F., Orcel, C., and Kuppers, M., 2004. The 12,460-year Hohenheim oak and pine tree-ring chronology from central Europe—A unique annual record for radiocarbon calibration and paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Radiocarbon 46(3):1111–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goslar, T., and Pazdur, F. M., 1985. ‘Czarny dąb’ z Lublinka – najstarszy dąb kopalny z terenu Polski. Wszechświat 86:203–204.Google Scholar
Griggs, C. B., De Gaetano, A. T., Kuniholm, P. I., and Newton, M. W., 2007. A regional reconstruction of May–June precipitation in the north Aegean from oak tree-rings, AD 1089–1989. International Journal of Climatology 27(8):1075–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griggs, C. B., Kuniholm, P. I., Newton, M. W., Watkins, J., and Manning, S. W., 2009. A 924-year regional oak tree-ring chronology for North-Central Turkey. In Tree-Rings, Kings, and Old World Archaeology and Environment: Papers Presented in Honor of Peter Ian Kuniholm, edited by Manning, S. W., and Bruce, M. J.; pp. 71–80. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Haneca, K., Ważny, T., Van Acker, J., and Beeckman, H., 2005. Provenancing Baltic timber from art historical objects: Success and limitations. Journal of Archaeological Science 32:261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haneca, K., Čufar, K., and Beeckman, H., 2009. Oaks, tree-rings and wooden cultural heritage: A review of the main characteristics and applications of oak dendrochronology in Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 36(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, K., Hamid, A., Madar, L., and Brewer, P., 2008. Corina User Guide. http://dendro.cornell.edu/corina/corina.php.Google Scholar
Hillam, J., 1998. Dendrochronology. Guidelines on Producing and Interpreting Dendrochronological Dates. Ancient Monuments Laboratory, Conservation and Technology, English Heritage, London, 35 pp.Google Scholar
Hollstein, E., 1980. Mitteleuropäische Eichenchronologie. Trierer dendrochronologische Forschungen zur Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte. Trier Grabungen und Forschungen 11. Verlag Philipp von Zabern, Mainz am Rhein.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. L., 1983. Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bulletin 43:69–78.Google Scholar
Hughes, M. K., Kuniholm, P. I., Eischeid, J. K., Garfin, G., Griggs, C. B., and Latini, C., 2001. Aegean tree-ring signature years explained. Tree-Ring Research 57(1):67–73.Google Scholar
Jansma, E., 1995. RemembeRINGs: The Development and Application of Local and Regional Tree-Ring Chronologies of Oak for the Purposes of Archaeological and Historicalal Research in the Netherlands. Ph.D. dissertation, Amsterdam University. Nederlandse Archeologische Rapporten 19. 149 pp.Google Scholar
Karaca, M., Deniz, A., and Tayanç, M., 2000. Cyclone track variability over Turkey in association with regional climate. International Journal of Climatology 20(10):1225–1236.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaznacheeva, V. D., and Shuvalov, S. V., 2012. Climatic characteristics of Mediterranean cyclones. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology 37(5):315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolar, T., Kyncl, T., and Rybniček, M., 2012. Oak chronology development in the Czech Republic and its teleconnection on a European scale. Dendrochronologia 30(3):243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krąpiec, M., 1998. Oak dendrochronology of the Neoholocene in Poland. Folia Quaternaria 69:5–133.Google Scholar
Kuniholm, P. I., 1996. Long tree-ring chronologies for the eastern Mediterranean. In Archaeometry 94: Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium on Archaeometry, Ankara 9–14 May 1994, edited by Demirci, S., Ozer, A. M., and Summers, G. D.; pp. 401–409. Tubitak, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
Kuniholm, P. I., 2000. Dendrochronologically dated Ottoman monuments. In A Historical Archaeology of the Ottoman Empire: Breaking New Ground, edited by Baram, U., and Carroll, L.; pp. 93–136. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kuniholm, P. I., and Striker, C. L., 1987. Dendrochronological investigations in the Aegean and neighboring regions, 1983–1986. Journal of Field Archaeology 14(4):385–398.Google Scholar
Läänelaid, A., Sohar, K., and Meikar, T., 2008. Present state and chronology of oaks in an oak forest in Saaremaa Island, Estonia. Baltic Forestry 14(1):34–43.Google Scholar
Lang, G., 1994. Quartäre Vegetationsgeschichte Europas. Methoden und Ergebnisse. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
Lorentzen, B. E., 2014. Variability in Levantine Tree-Ring Records and Its Applications in Dendrochronological Dating, Provenancing, and Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction in the Southern Levant. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Medwecka-Kornaś, A., 1972. Czynniki naturalne wplywające na rozmieszczenie geograficzne roślin w Polsce. In Szata roślinna Polski, I, edited by Szafer, W., and Zarzycki, K.; pp. 35–94. PWN, Warsaw.Google Scholar
Meiggs, R., 1982. Trees and Timber in the Ancient Mediterranean World. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Milecka, K., Kupryjanowicz, M., Makohonienko, M., Okuniewska-Nowaczyk, I., and Nalepka, D., 2004. Isopollen history of trees and shrubs: Quercus L. –Oak. In Late Glacial and Holocene History of Vegetation in Poland based on Isopollen Maps, edited by Ralska-Jasiewiczowa, M., Latałowa, M., Wasylikowa, K., Tobolski, K., Madeyska, E., Wright, H. E., and Turner, C.; pp. 189–197. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.Google Scholar
Müller, A., and Heußner, K.-U., 2012. Dendro-provenancing extreme for Suakin Sudan. In TRACE — Tree Rings in Archaeology, Climatology and Ecology. Program and Abstracts of the Dendrosymposium 2012, May 9–12, 2012, Potsdam and Eberswalde, Germany; pp. 31.Google Scholar
Nechita, C., 2013. Reţeaua naţonală de serii dendrocronologice pentru stejar şi gorun. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Suceava, Romania.Google Scholar
Ozenda, P., 1994. La végétation du continent européen. Delachaux and Niestlé, Lausanne.Google Scholar
Panayotov, M., Bebi, P., Trouet, V., and Yurukov, S., 2010. Climate signal in tree-ring chronologies of Pinus peuce and Pinus heldreichii from the Pirin Mountains in Bulgaria. Trees 24(3):479–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, C. L., Griggs, C. B., Kuniholm, P. I., Brewer, P. W., Ważny, T., and Canady, L., 2012. Dendroarchaeology of the mid-first millennium AD in Constantinople. Journal of Archaeological Science 39(11):3402–3414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, R. J., Brewer, S., Bordacs, S., Burg, K., Cheddadi, R., Coart, E., Cottrell, J., Csaikl, U. M., van Dam, B. C., Deans, J. D., Fineschi, S., Finkeldey, R., Glaz, I., Goicoechea, P. G., Jensen, J. S., Konig, A. O., Lowe, A. J., Madsen, S. F., Matyas, G., Munro, R. C., Popescu, F., Slade, D., Tabbener, H., de Vries, S. M. G., Ziegenhagen, B., de Beaulieu, J.-L., and Kremer, A., 2002. Identification of refugia and post-glacial colonization routes of European white oaks based on chloroplast DNA and fossil pollen evidence. Forest Ecology and Management 156(1–3):49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilcher, J. R., Baillie, M. G. L., Schmidt, B., and Becker, B., 1984. A 7272-year tree-ring chronology for western Europe. Nature 312(5990):150–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popa, I., and Kern, Z., 2008. Long-term summer temperature reconstruction inferred from tree-ring records from the Eastern Carpathians. Climate Dynamics 32(7–8):1107–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinn, F., 2005. TSAP - Time Series Analysis and Presentation. Version 0.53 for Microsoft Windows - User Reference. Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Sander, C., and Levanič, T., 1996. Comparison of t-values calculated in different dendrochronological programmes. Dendrochronologia 14:269–272.Google Scholar
Schaub, M., Kaiser, K. F., Frank, D. C., Büntgen, U., Kromer, B., and Talamo, S., 2008. Environmental change during the Alleröd and Younger Dryas reconstructed from Swiss tree-ring data. Boreas 37(1):74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweingruber, F. H., 1988: Tree Rings: Basics and Application of Dendrochronology. D. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweingruber, F. H., and Ruoff, U., 1979. Stand und Anwendung der Dendrochronologie in der Schweiz. Zur dendrochronologischen Datierung älterer Holzbauten in der Schweiz. Zeitschrift für Schweizerische Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte 36(2):69–90.Google Scholar
Sohar, K., Läänelaid, A., Eckstein, D., Helama, S., and Jaagus, J., 2014. Dendroclimatic signals of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) in Estonia. European Journal of Forest Research 133(3):535–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanţäu, I., Feurdean, A., de Beaulieu, J. L., Reille, M., and Fărcaş, S., 2011. Holocene vegetation history in the upper forest belt of the Eastern Romanian Carpathians. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 309(3-4):281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouet, V., Panayotov, M., Ivanova, A., and Frank, D., 2012. A pan-European summer teleconnection mode recorded by a new temperature reconstruction from the northeastern Mediterranean (AD 1768–2008). The Holocene 22(8):887–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyers, I., 2004. Dendro for Windows program guide. ARCUS Rep. 340.Google Scholar
Ufnalski, K., 2006. Teleconnection of 23 modern chronologies of Quercus robur and Q. petraea from Poland. Dendrobiology 55:51–56.Google Scholar
Ważny, T., 1990. Aufbau und Anwendung der Dendrochronologie für Eichenholz in Polen. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
Ważny, T., 2009. Is there a separate tree-ring pattern for the Mediterranean oaks? In Tree-Rings, Kings, and Old World Archaeology and Environment: Papers Presented in Honor of Peter Ian Kuniholm, edited by Manning, S. W., and Bruce, M. J.; pp. 41–50. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ważny, T., and Eckstein, D., 1991. The dendrochronological signal of oak (Quercus spp.) in Poland. Dendrochronologia 9:35–49.Google Scholar
Wigley, T. M. L., Jones, P. D., and Briffa, K. R., 1987. Cross-dating methods in dendrochronology. Journal of Archaeological Science 14(1):51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar