Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:17:33.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bomb Radiocarbon and the Hawaiian Archipelago: Coral, Otoliths, and Seawater

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Allen H Andrews ,
Daria Siciliano ,
Donald C Potts ,
Edward E DeMartini  and
Stephannie Covarrubias
Allen H Andrews*
Affiliation:
NOAA Fisheries, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, 1845 Wasp Boulevard, Honolulu, HI 96818, USA.
Daria Siciliano
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Sciences, 316 Earth and Marine Science Building, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. The Ocean Foundation, 1320 19th St NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
Donald C Potts
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Sciences, 316 Earth and Marine Science Building, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Edward E DeMartini
Affiliation:
NOAA Fisheries, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, 1845 Wasp Boulevard, Honolulu, HI 96818, USA.
Stephannie Covarrubias
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Sciences, 316 Earth and Marine Science Building, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corals of the Hawaiian Archipelago are well situated in the North Pacific Gyre (NPG) to record how bomb-produced radiocarbon has been sequestered and transported by the sea. While this signal can be traced accurately through time in reef-building corals and used to infer oceanographic processes and determine the ages of marine organisms, a comprehensive and validated record has been lacking for the Hawaiian Archipelago. In this study, a coral core from Kure Atoll in the northwestern Hawaiian Islands was used to create a high-resolution bomb 14C record for the years 1939–2002, and was then used with other 14C measurements in fish otoliths and seawater to explore differences and similarities in the bomb 14C signal throughout the Hawaiian Archipelago. The Kure Atoll sample series produced a well-defined bomb 14C curve that, with some exceptions, was similar to other coral 14C records from the Hawaiian Archipelago. Subtle differences in the coral 14C records across the region may be explained by the large-scale ocean circulation patterns and decadal cycles of the NPG. The most rapid increase of 14C, in the 1950s and 1960s, showed similar timing across the Hawaiian Archipelago and provides a robust basis for use of bomb 14C dating to obtain high-precision age determinations of marine organisms. Reference otoliths of juvenile fish demonstrated the use of the post-peak 14C decline period as a viable reference in the age validation of younger and more recently collected fishes, and effectively extended the utility of bomb 14C dating to the latest 30 yr.

Keywords

carbon-14snappergrouperage validationNorth Pacific Gyreoceanography
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 531 - 548
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, AH, Kalish, JM, Newman, SJ, Johnston, JM. 2011. Bomb radiocarbon dating of three important reef-fish species using Indo-Pacific ∆14C chronologies. Marine and Freshwater Research 62:1259–1269.Google Scholar
Andrews, AH, DeMartini, EE, Brodziak, J, Nichols, JS, Humphreys, RL. 2012. A long-lived life history for a tropical, deep-water snapper (Pristipomoides filamentosus): bomb radiocarbon and lead-radium dating as extensions of daily increment analyses in otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 69:1850–1869.Google Scholar
Andrews, AH, Barnett, BK, Allman, RJ, Moyer, RP, Trowbridge, HD. 2013. Great longevity of speckled hind (Epinephelus drummondhayi), a deep-water grouper, with novel use of post-bomb radiocarbon dating in the Gulf of Mexico. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 70:1131–1140.Google Scholar
Andrews, AH, Choat, JH, Hamilton, RJ, DeMartini, EE. 2015. Refined bomb radiocarbon dating of two iconic fishes of the Great Barrier Reef. Marine and Freshwater Research 66:305–316.Google Scholar
Baker, MS, Wilson, CA. 2001. Use of bomb radiocarbon to validate otolith section ages of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Limnology and Oceanography 46:1819–1824.Google Scholar
Bien, GS, Rakestraw, NW, Suess, HE. 1965. Radiocarbon in the Pacific and Indian Oceans and its relation to deep water movements. Limnology and Oceanography 10:25–37.Google Scholar
Bonjean, F, Lagerloef, GSE. 2002. Diagnostic model and analysis of the surface currents in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Journal of Physical Oceanography 32:2938–2954.Google Scholar
Broecker, WS, Peng, T-H. 1982. Tracers in the Sea. Lamont–Doherty Geological Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY. 690 p.Google Scholar
Broecker, WS, Peng, T-H, Ostlund, G, Stuiver, M. 1985. The distribution of bomb radiocarbon in the ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research C4:6953–6970.Google Scholar
Dana, TF. 1971. On the reef corals of the world’s most northern atoll (Kure: Hawaiian Archipelago). Pacific Science 25:80–87.Google Scholar
Darrenougue, N, De Deckker, P, Payri, C, Eggins, S, Fallon, S. 2013. Growth and chronology of the rhodolith-forming, coralline red alga Sporolithon durum . Marine Ecological Progress Series 474:105–119.Google Scholar
Desch, A, Wynne, T, Brainard, R, Friedlander, A, Christensen, J. 2009. Oceanographic and physical setting. In: Friedlander A, Keller K, Wedding L, Clarke A, Monaco M, editors. A Marine Biogeographic Assessment of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 84. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument. Silver Spring, MD. p 17–63.Google Scholar
Di Lorenzo, E, Schneider, N, Cobb, KM, Franks, PJS, Chhak, K, Miller, AJ, McWilliams, JC, Bograd, SJ, Arango, H, Curchitser, E, Powell, TM, Riviére, P. 2008. North Pacific Gyre oscillation links ocean climate and ecosystem change. Geophysical Research Letters 35(8):L08607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druffel, ERM. 1987. Bomb radiocarbon in the Pacific: Annual and seasonal timescale variations. Journal of Marine Research 45:667–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druffel, ERM. 2002. Radiocarbon in corals: records of the carbon cycle, surface circulation and climate. Oceanography 15:122–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druffel, ERM, Griffin, S. 2008. Daily variability of dissolved inorganic radiocarbon at three sites in the surface ocean. Marine Chemistry 110:185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druffel, ERM, Williams, PM, Robertson, K, Griffin, S, Jull, AJT, Donahue, D, Toolin, L, Linick, TW. 1989. Radiocarbon in dissolved organic and inorganic carbon from the central North Pacific. Radiocarbon 31(3):523–532.Google Scholar
Druffel, ERM, Griffin, S, Guilderson, TP, Kashgarian, M, Southon, J, Schrag, DP. 2001. Changes of subtropical north Pacific radiocarbon and correlation with climate variability. Radiocarbon 43(1):15–25.Google Scholar
Druffel, ERM, Bauer, JE, Griffin, S, Beaupre, SR, Hwang, J. 2008. Dissolved inorganic radiocarbon in the North Pacific Ocean and Sargasso Sea. Deep-Sea Research I 55:451–459.Google Scholar
Fallon, SJ, Guilderson, TP. 2005. Extracting growth rates from the nonlaminated coralline sponge Astrosclera willeyana using bomb radiocarbon. Limnology and Oceanography Methods 3:455–461.Google Scholar
Fallon, SJ, Guilderson, TP. 2008. Surface water processes in the Indonesian throughflow as documented by high resolution coral ∆14C. Journal of Geophysical Research 113:C09001.Google Scholar
Grigg, RW. 1982. Darwin Point: a threshold for atoll formation. Coral Reefs 1:29–34.Google Scholar
Grottoli, AG, Eakin, CM. 2007. A review of modern coral δ18O and ∆14C proxy records. Earth-Science Reviews 81(1–2):67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grottoli, AG, Gille, ST, Druffel, ERM, Dunbar, RB. 2003. Decadal timescale shift in the 14C record of a central equatorial Pacific coral. Radiocarbon 45(1):91–99.Google Scholar
Guilderson, TP, Schrag, DP, Kashgarian, M, Southon, J. 1998. Radiocarbon variability in the western equatorial Pacific inferred from a high-resolution coral record from Nauru Island. Journal of Geophysical Research 103(C11):24,641–50.Google Scholar
Hare, SR, Mantua, NJ. 2000. Empirical evidence for North Pacific regime shift in 1977 and 1989. Progress in Oceanography 47:103–145.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Barbetti, M, Rakowski, AZ. 2013. Atmospheric radiocarbon for the period 1950–2010. Radiocarbon 55(4):2059–2072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huwaldt, JA. 2011. Plot Digitizer. Version 2.5.1. URL: http://plotdigitizer.sourceforge.net.Google Scholar
Kalish, JM. 1993. Pre- and post-bomb radiocarbon in fish otoliths. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 114:549–554.Google Scholar
Key, R. 1996. WOCE Pacific Ocean radiocarbon program. Radiocarbon 38(3):415–423.Google Scholar
Konishi, K, Tanaka, T, Sakanoue, M. 1982. Secular variation of radiocarbon concentration in seawater: sclerochronological approach. Proceedings of the Fourth International Coral Reef Symposium 1:181–185.Google Scholar
Kumamoto, Y, Murata, A, Kawano, T, Watanabe, S, Fukasawa, M. 2013. Decadal changes in bomb-produced radiocarbon in the Pacific Ocean from the 1990s to 2000s. Radiocarbon 55(3):1641–1650.Google Scholar
Linick, TW. 1975. Uptake of bomb-produced carbon-14 by the Pacific Ocean [PhD thesis]. University of California, San Diego. 255 p.Google Scholar
Morimoto, M, Kitagawa, H, Shibata, Y, Kayanne, H. 2004. Seasonal radiocarbon variation of surface seawater recorded in a coral from Kikai Island, subtropical Northwestern Pacific. Radiocarbon 46(2):643–648.Google Scholar
Nydal, R, Gislefoss, JS. 1996. Further application of bomb 14C as a tracer in the atmosphere and ocean. Radiocarbon 38(3):389–406.Google Scholar
Ostlund, HG, Stuiver, M. 1980. GEOSECS Pacific radiocarbon. Radiocarbon 22(1):25–53.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Brown, TA, Reimer, RW. 2004. Discussion: reporting and calibration of post-bomb 14C data. Radiocarbon 46(3):1299–1304.Google Scholar
Roark, EB, Guilderson, TP, Dunbar, RB, Ingram, BL. 2006. Radiocarbon-based ages and growth rates of Hawaiian deep–sea corals. Marine Ecological Progress Series 327:1–14.Google Scholar
Rodgers, KB, Schrag, DP, Cane, MA, Naik, NH. 2000. The bomb 14C transient in the Pacific Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research 105(C4):8489–8512.Google Scholar
Rooney, J, Donham, E, Montgomery, A, Spalding, H, Parrish, F, Borland, R, Fenner, D, Gove, J, Vetter, O. 2010. Mesophotic coral ecosystems in the Hawaiian Archipelago. Coral Reefs 29:361–367.Google Scholar
Siciliano, D. 2005. Latitudinal limits to coral reef accretion: testing the Darwin point hypothesis at Kure Atoll, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, using new evidence from high resolution remote sensing and in situ data [PhD thesis]. University of California, Santa Cruz. 276 p.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Ostlund, G, Key, RM, Reimer, PJ. 1996. Large volume WOCE radiocarbon sampling in the Pacific Ocean. Radiocarbon 38(3):519–561.Google Scholar
Wara, MW, Anderson, LD, Schellenberg, SA, Franks, R, Ravelo, AC, Delaney, ML. 2003. Application of a radially viewed inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometer to simultaneous measurement of Mg/Ca, Sr/Ca, and Mn/Ca ratios in marine biogenic carbonates. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 4(8):8406.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Andrews supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Andrews supplementary material(File)
File 430.7 KB