Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T07:35:13.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Beta Test Comparison Between the New Packard 2260 XL and the LKB Quantulus and 1219 SM: Low-Level Radiocarbon and Tritium Determinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Robert M Kalin
Robert M Kalin*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Department of Geosciences University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A Packard 2260 XL liquid scintillation counter was placed in an underground counting chamber to test performance under immense physical shielding. Results from the Packard 2260 XL are compared with two other counters under the same conditions, the LKB Quantulus, which has operated for two years in this laboratory, and the LKB 1219 SM, in use since January 1988.

Type
I. Sample Preparation and Measurement Techniques
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 31 , Issue 3: June 20-25, 1988 Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia , 1989 , pp. 368 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Bowman, S, 1989, Liquid scintillation counting in the London Underground: Radiocarbon, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, J M and Haas, H, 1987, Scintillation counter performance at the SMU radiocarbon laboratory: Radiocarbon, v 29, no. 1, p 12–17.Google Scholar
Kalin, R M and Long, A, 1989, Radiocarbon dating with the Quantulus in an underground counting laboratory: Performance and background sources: Radiocarbon, this issue.Google Scholar
Noakes, J and Valenta, R, 1989, Low background liquid scintillation counting using an active sample vial holder and pulse discrimination electronics: Radiocarbon, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönhofer, F and Henrich, E, 1987, Recent progress application of low level liquid scintillation counting: Jour Radioanal Nuclear Chem, v 115, no. 2, p 317–333.Google Scholar