Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:22:29.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age Reporting of Very Old Samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Adam Walanus  and
Mieczysław F Pazdur
Adam Walanus
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University, ul Krzywoustego 2, PL-44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Mieczysław F Pazdur
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University, ul Krzywoustego 2, PL-44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Problems of the statistical interpretation of radiocarbon age measurements of old samples are discussed, based on the notion of fiducial probability distribution. A probability density function of age has been given. A detailed discussion of different facets of the probability distribution of age has led us to the confirmation of the use of 2σ as the best limiting value between the regions of finite and infinite dates. It has been proposed to make use of the principle of constant probability P = 0.68 in the regions of both finite and infinite ages instead of the criterion N + kσ.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , 1980 , pp. 1021 - 1027
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Callow, W J and Hassal, G I, 1970, National Physical Laboratory radiocarbon measurements VII: Radiocarbon, v 12, p 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Lloyd A, 1968, Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination: AnalyticalChemistryXS, v. 40, p 586–592.Google Scholar
Gough, K J, in press, The reporting of very old radiocarbon dates: Lower Hutt, New Zealand Inst Nucl Sci Contr No. 485, in press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian, 1965, Logic of statistical inference: Cambridge, Cambridge Univ Press, 232 p.Google Scholar
Kendall, M G and Stuart, Alan, 1963, The advanced theory of statistics, vol 2, Inference and relationship: London, Griffin, 433 p.Google Scholar
Polach, H A, 1976, Radiocarbon dating as a research tool in archaeology—hopes and limitations, in Barnard, Noel, ed, Symposium on scientific methods of research in the study of ancient Chinese Bronzes and Southeast Asian metal and other archaeological artifacts: Proc Australian Natl Univ, Dept Far Eastern History Pub.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze, 1969, Yale natural radiocarbon measurements IX: Radiocarbon v 11 p 545–658.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze and Polach, H A, 1977, Discussion: Reporting of 14C data: Radiocarbon v 19, p 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar