Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T04:49:35.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adoption and Evaluation of a sample Pretreatment Protocol for Radiocarbon Dating of Cremated Bones at HEKAL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2018

István Major ,
János Dani ,
Viktória Kiss ,
Eszter Melis ,
Róbert Patay ,
Géza Szabó ,
Katalin Hubay ,
Marianna Túri ,
István Futó  and
Róbert Huszánk
...Show all authors
István Major*
Affiliation:
Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA ATOMKI), Bem Square 18/c, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
János Dani
Affiliation:
Déri Museum, Déri Square 1, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
Viktória Kiss
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Tóth Kálmán Street 4, H-1097 Budapest, Hungary
Eszter Melis
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Tóth Kálmán Street 4, H-1097 Budapest, Hungary
Róbert Patay
Affiliation:
Ferenczy Museum, Main Square 2-5, H-2000 Szentendre, Hungary
Géza Szabó
Affiliation:
Wosinsky Mór Museum, Szent István Square 26, H-7100 Szekszárd, Hungary
Katalin Hubay
Affiliation:
Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA ATOMKI), Bem Square 18/c, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
Marianna Túri
Affiliation:
Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA ATOMKI), Bem Square 18/c, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
István Futó
Affiliation:
Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA ATOMKI), Bem Square 18/c, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
Róbert Huszánk
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA ATOMKI), Bem Square 18/c, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
A J Timothy Jull
Affiliation:
Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA ATOMKI), Bem Square 18/c, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary Department of Geosciences, University of ArizonaAMS Laboratory, 1118 E. Fourth St., Tucson, AZ 85721USA
Mihály Molnár
Affiliation:
Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA ATOMKI), Bem Square 18/c, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A comparative study was undertaken to adopt and evaluate a radiocarbon (14C) preparation procedure for accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) measurements of cremated bones at our laboratory, including different types of archaeological samples (cremated bone, bone, charcoal, charred grain). All 14C analyses were performed using the EnvironMICADAS AMS instrument at the Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies (HEKAL) and the ancillary analyses were also performed at the Institute for Nuclear Research (ATOMKI). After the physical and chemical cleaning of cremated bones, CO2 was extracted by acid hydrolysis followed by sealed-tube graphitization and 14C measurement. The supplementary δ13C measurements were also performed on CO2 gas while FTIR was measured on the powder fraction. Based on the FTIR and 14C analyses, our chemical pretreatment protocol was successful in removing contamination from the samples. Good reproducibility was obtained for the 0.2–0.3 mm fraction of blind-tested cremated samples and a maximum age difference of only 150 yr was found for the remaining case studies. This confirms the reliability of our procedure for 14C dating of cremated bones. However, in one case study, the age difference of 300 yr between two cremated fragments originating from the same urn shows that other processes affecting the cremated samples in the post-burial environment can substantially influence the 14C age, so caution must be exercised.

Keywords

cremated boneFTIRpreparationradiocarbon datingstable isotope
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 159 - 171
Copyright
© 2018 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360.Google Scholar
Cherkinsky, A. 2009. Can we get a good radiocarbon age from “bad bone”? Determining the reliability of radiocarbon age from bioapatite. Radiocarbon 51(2):647–655.Google Scholar
Csongor, É, Bognár-Kurtizán, I, Szabó, I, Hertelendi, E. 1983. Radiocarbon dating of Holocene bone samples in Hungary. Chemical and Mathematical Techniques Applied to Archaeology 8:385.Google Scholar
Dani, J, Köhler, K, Kulcsár, G, Major, I, Melis, E, Patay, R, Szabó, G, Hajdu, T, Hubay, K, Futó, I, Huszánk, R, Molnár, M, Kiss, V. 2017. Case studies for the dating of Bronze Age cremation burials from Hungary. In: Nona Palincas, editor. Proceedings of the Fifth Balkan Symposium of Archaeometry.Google Scholar
Das, O, Wang, Y, Hsieh, YP. 2010. Chemical and carbon isotopic characteristics of ash and smoke derived from burning of C3 and C4 grasses. Organic Geochemistry 41:263–269.Google Scholar
Hajdu, T, György-Toronyi, A, Pap, I, Rosendahl, W, Szabó, G. 2016. The chronology and meaning of the Transdanubian encrusted pottery decoration. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 91(2):353–368.Google Scholar
Hassan, AA, Termine, JD, Haynes, CV. 1977. Mineralogical studies on bone apatite and their implications for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 19(3):364–374.Google Scholar
Hüls, CM, Erlenkeuser, H, Nadeau, M-J, Grootes, PM, Andersen, N. 2010. Experimental study on the origin of cremated bone apatite carbon. Radiocarbon 52(2):587–599.Google Scholar
Janovics, R. 2015. Development of radiocarbon-based measuring methods and their application for nuclear environmental monitoring [PhD thesis]. Debrecen, Hungary: University of Debrecen Press.Google Scholar
Lanting, JN, Aerts-Bijma, AT, van der Plicht, J. 2001. Dating of cremated bones. Radiocarbon 43(2A):249–254.Google Scholar
Lee-Thorp, JA, van der Merwe, NJ. 1991. Aspects of the chemistry of modern and fossil biological apatites. Journal of Archaeological Science 18(3):343–354.Google Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230(5291):241–242.Google Scholar
Mays, S. 1998. The Archaeology of Human Bones. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGeehin, J, Burr, GS, Jull, AJT, Reines, D, Gosse, J, Davis, PT, Muhs, D, Southon, J. 2001. Stepped-combustion 14C dating of sediment: A comparison with established techniques. Radiocarbon 43(2A):255–261.Google Scholar
Molnár, M, Rinyu, L, Janovics, R, Major, I, Veres, M. 2012. Introduction of the new AMS C-14 laboratory in Debrecen. Archeometriai Műhely 9(3):147–160.Google Scholar
Molnár, M, Janovics, R, Major, I, Orsovszki, J, Gönczi, R, Veres, M, Leonard, AG, Castle, SM, Lange, TE, Wacker, L, Hajdas, I, Jull, AJT. 2013. Status report of the new AMS 14C sample preparation lab of the Hertelendi Laboratory of the Environmental Studies (Debrecen, Hungary). Radiocarbon 55(2–3):665–676.Google Scholar
Molnár, M, Rinyu, L, Veres, M, Seiler, M, Wacker, L, Synal, H-A. 2013b. EnvironMICADAS: a mini 14C AMS with enhanced gas ion source interface in the Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies (HEKAL), Hungary. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):338–344.Google Scholar
Munro, LE, Longstaffe, J, White, CD. 2007. Burning and boiling of modern deer bone: Effects on crystallinity and oxygen isotope composition of bioapatite phosphate. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 249:90–102.Google Scholar
Naysmith, P, Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Heinemeier, J, van der Plicht, J, Van Strydonck, M, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Freeman, SPHT. 2007. A cremated bone intercomparison study. Radiocarbon 49(2):403–408.Google Scholar
Olsen, J, Heinemeier, J, Bennike, P, Krause, C, Hornstrup, KM, Thrane, H. 2008. Characterisation and blind testing of radiocarbon dating of cremated bone. Journal of Archaeological Science 35:791–800.Google Scholar
Patay, R. 2013. Bell Beaker cemetery and settlement at Szigetszentmiklós: first results. In: Transitions to the Bronze Age. Interregional Interaction and Socio-Cultural Change in the Third Millennium BC Carpathian Basin and Neighbouring Regions. p 287–317.Google Scholar
Quarta, G, Tiberi, I, Rossi, M, Aprile, G, Braione, E, D’Elia, M, Ingravallo, E, Calcagnile, L. 2014. The Cooper Age Mound Necropolis in Salve, Lecce, Italy: radiocarbon dating results on charcoals, bones. cremated bones and pottery. Radiocarbon 56(3):949–957.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Warren Beck, J, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatte, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.Google Scholar
Richards, MP, Hedges, REM. 1999. Stable isotope evidence for similarities in the types of marine foods used by late mesolithic humans at sites along the Atlantic coast of Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:717–722.Google Scholar
Rinyu, L, Molnár, M, Major, I, Nagy, T, Veres, M, Kimák, Á, Wacker, L, Synal, H-A. 2013. Optimization of sealed tube graphitization method for environmental 14C studies using MICADAS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294(1):270–275.Google Scholar
Snoeck, C, Brock, F, Schulting, RJ. 2014. Carbon exchanges between bone apatite and fuels during cremation: impact on radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 56(2):591–602.Google Scholar
Starkovich, BM, Hodgins, GWL, Voyatzis, ME, Romano, DG. 2013. Dating gods: radiocarbon dates from the sanctuary of Zeus on Mt. Lykaion (Arcadia, Greece). Radiocarbon 55(2):501–513.Google Scholar
Surovell, TA. 2000. Radiocarbon dating of bone apatite by step heating. Geoarchaeology 15:591–608.Google Scholar
Taylor, RE, Aitken, MJ. 1997. Chronometric dating in archaeology. Advances in Archaeological and Museum Science.Google Scholar
Tóth, G, Melis, E, Ilon, G. 2016. The anthropological and corresponding archaeological results of the Bronze Age material from the Ménfőcsanak excavation (2009–2011). In: Csécs T, Takács M, editors. Beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam. Ünnepi kötet Tomka Péter 75. Születésnapjára. Győr. p 737–755.Google Scholar
Újvári, G, Molnár, M, Barna-Páll, G. 2016. Charcoal and mollusc shell 14C-dating of the Dunaszekcső loess record, Hungary. Quaternary Geochronology 35:43–53.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, Hoefkens, M, De Mulder, G. 2005. 14C dating of cremated bones, why does it work? Lunula 13:3–10.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, De Mulder, G. 2009. 14C dating of cremated bones: the issue of sample contamination. Radiocarbon 51(2):553–568.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, De Mulder, G. 2010. The carbon origin of structural carbonate in bone apatite of cremated bones. Radiocarbon 52(2):578–586.Google Scholar
Vaughan, JM. 1970. The Physiology of Bone. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Christl, M, Synal, H-A. 2010. Bats: A new tool for AMS data reduction. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268:976–979.Google Scholar
Wang, H, Ambrose, SH, Hedman, KM, Emerson, TE. 2010. AMS 14C dating of human bones using sequential pyrolysis and combustion of collagen. Radiocarbon 52(1):157–163.Google Scholar
Zazzo, A, Saliège, JF, Person, A, Boucher, H. 2009. Radiocarbon dating of cremated bones, where does the carbon come from? Radiocarbon 51(2):601–611.Google Scholar
Zazzo, A, Saliège, JF. 2011. Radiocarbon dating of biological apatites: a review. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 310:52–61.Google Scholar